Jump to content

Vambo57

Saints
  • Posts

    1,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Vambo57

  1. On 7/29/2019 at 4:42 PM, faraway saint said:

    I know you are like a parrot on speed but I'll remind you, again, you have the option to view ignored posts if you choose.

    Usual deflection. 

    Anyhow, I knew you wouldn't choose the private message option as you actually revel in being a walloper. 

    TBH if it wasn't for BEK no cnut would engage with you at all. :lol:

    Why don't we ALL not answer Baz... he'll soon f**k off

  2. 5 hours ago, spankin_panda said:

    I get where you are going with this.... 2014/5's kit was a shiter, however, I think these actually (going by twitter and social media mainly) a lot of satisfaction for these kits.

    Therefore, I plump for it looking like a 10th Place kit, so we are gonnae be ok!  :thumbs2

    Got to say, the season past's away kit was a cracker and sad to see it go. Red away kits are a favorite of mine (particularly some of the AC milan style ones).

    I hope you are right Bud.

    2 hours ago, TPAFKATS said:
    20 hours ago, Vambo57 said:
    I imagine we will come in for a pile of laughing and finger pointing for that.
    The lunatics have taken over the strip committee.
    When we have been relegated in the past, it is usually accompanied by a shite strip. This absolutely REEKS of a Relegation strip... unfortunately.

    Meltdown

    Hardly. Just stating my opinion Bud.

  3. On 4/18/2019 at 11:37 PM, W6Saint said:

    Take this how you will, but I have been told you're spreading vicious (also untrue) rumours at the most important stage of the season for the club you support on a public forum, for what reason i'm not entirely sure. 

    How do you know it is untrue?  I wasn't told who it was.  My statement was hardly vicious mate.

    Anyway, as I said, take it as you will.  Could be a pile of shite.

  4. 1 minute ago, Doakes said:

    I was reading into that the other day. The building used to belong to the French state, (French ministry of culture) but in recent years they could no longer afford to maintain it due to budget cuts. Ownership was transferred to a group called, "The Friends of Notre-Dame de Paris",  which was created as a charity by the Archbishop of Paris and the Diocese of Paris. Fortunately for the building, and the Archbishop of Paris - this means they can accept these huge donations from various billionaires with no tax issues. The French state is meant to provide self-insurance for any religious building built prior to 1905.

    So that's why the French Gov are looking to be bailed out then...

  5. 56 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

    Oh look he's back, more lies this time about leaving the chat... :rolleyes:

    An example... are you trying to say you and LPM view that we can easily put incentives in place to increase our crowds to the Dundee game level for every single one is realistic or idealistic?  

    Again you are lying, I have no issue with different opinions, I don't need to agree with them and I am well within my right to ask people how they've arrived at their opposing opinion. 

    What exactly have I made up? I suppose calling me Jim Traynor is not as bad as shamefully hinting at me supporting one of the bigot brothers... Dropping down to their level, pathetic. 

    Sorry, I didn't realise you were going to respond, if I knew that I wouldn't have given the benefit of the doubt that you have the common sense to know when I say a 'few' I didn't literally mean there are only a few season ticket holders in the family stand :lol: Most of the other people on this thread have the intelligence not to make such a literal and ridiculous conclusion. 

    Again, show me where I have lied, you can't and haven't been able to since the start of this thread. 

    Kilmarnock, Livi crowd, increased season ticket sales, increased crowds, away fan numbers are all evidence I am right Motherwell crowds are very likely indicators. They all elude to this arrangement represents a financial benefit. But for the millionth time, 'the financial benefit being worth it' IS MY OPINION. I have backed my reasons why it is my opinion.

    Your opinion might be it does not, you have not backed it in the slightest. 

    Well, you have given your opinion ad-infinitum, so it's time to shut up ald let everyone else have their say without you jumping in to answer EVERY post.  BORING!

  6. 1 hour ago, bazil85 said:

    No person attack at all, LPM has consistently shown he is against all things GLS and SMFC. Just look at his posts. 

    I have provided actual figures that prove the 1,000 drop he claims is all down to the two stands deal isn’t correct. So his point has been answered.

    What’s your response to the fall in numbers being in line with at least our last two weekday games not against Celtic or Rangers? 

    I don't want to get into this debate, but you are clearly choosing to ignore the fact that despite Celtic fans being given - and filling -2 stands, they still didn't beat the attendance at the Kilmarnock game.  So overall the home fans count was significantly down for the Celtic game 

  7. 1 hour ago, Lord Pityme said:

    No, you are incorrect! Smisa will hold the majority shareholding in the club, it will own the club and will choose the WHOLE board. Its not a token representation, it is full fan ownership. Seems a fair few havent yet grasped that THEY are/will be in charge?

    So, will SMiSA have to buy out the rest of the current Shareholders?

  8. On 2/17/2019 at 9:44 AM, Isle Of Bute Saint said:

    Just watched the highlights a bit unlucky. The pass is made our player is on side. But the saints player near the circle touched  the ball with his head when that happens our player is offside. On another day it would have been played on.

    ETA: No he didn't, you must be getting mixed up with another incident Bud.

    On 2/18/2019 at 11:48 AM, antrin said:

    I initially thought he was definitely OFF.

     

    Having now replayed this several times, I can see it is NOT as clear as I'd like to believe.

     

    I think he was ONSIDE ,just...

    I also note that no other Buddie touched the ball on its way forward as was suspected by other posters - and accepted by me.

     

     

    ETA:  The grass-cut markings give you the line of sight for veracity.

    Sportscene didn't even show the 'offside' in their highlights.  In the video above, at the exact point of the kick (you can pause and click each side on the red button to move a frame at a time), Kyle is 2-3 yds onside for a golden chance.  These are the kinds of decisions you get when you are at the bottom and the official is very-well-paid-but-hopeless.

    FFs he is only about 10 yds away from the incident and in a great position to judge... he failed. 

  9. On 2/3/2019 at 9:26 AM, chalky1 said:

    Anyone who makes mistakes like that in their line of work would get a bollicking from their manager, told to buck or they're out the door.

    They were not mistakes.  Dallas meant every one, real penalty or not.  He was biased. 

    He never gave the late one that actually was a penalty, as he did not want the distinction of holding the world record.  That would bring far too much scrutiny from folk outside this biased/scared wee bubble called Scotland on him and his standside linesman, as to why the actual feck fouls in the outfield, turned into penalties.  The spotlight would also have been turned on the corrupt SFA for not taking action on certain officials and players. As it is, abroad this is a curious wee story about funny wee Scotland.

    After a couple of years of Referees actually not giving The Rangers International decisions they probably should have, since Gerrard took over and started moaning about Refs, 'some' are reverting to 'type' or are scared of reprisals.

    Shhhhhhhhhhh

×
×
  • Create New...