slapsalmon
-
Posts
755 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by slapsalmon
-
-
Just now, faraway saint said:
Too late group 4 already booked, unless you want to share it?
I replied before I'd read the whole thread. Was hoping nobody noticed and put me in a group with that clown. I'll be the 5th group then thanks 😂
-
1 hour ago, oaksoft said:
Largely offline enjoying the first day of spring. I'd recommend it to others.
I'm not Baz and I'm not getting drawn into dozens of pages of defensive arguments so I'll make this brief. I've had my say on this issue, posted my graphs and predictions, which I will continue to update when trends change and I've nothing much more to add other than the following.
There are 3 groups who've read my posts on this.
Group 1 consists of people who at least grasp what I am trying to do with my graphs and predictions. This groups includes cockles, w6er TPAK thing and maybe one or two others that I've forgotten. Not one of us is sitting hoping my numbers are accurate. Our parents and loved ones are as much at risk of this f**king thing as everyone else's and we like to have a feel for when things MIGHT get very risky for them. I'll update as the trend changes. Happy to answer questions from this group.
Group 2 consists of those who have no demonstrable understanding of computational modelling whatsoever and have no serious alternatives to provide but despite this they are strangely over-confident in their criticism. I think they are in denial but that's their right. On this issue, I have no interest in wasting my time trying to change the minds of closed minded people. You are in this group with slarti, antrin and the f**kwit Biology teacher @FTOFwho, since he no longer has a job at the moment teaching kids to the test, has decided he wants to persuade us that overnight he has become an expert in all things to do with genetics.
He only has a partial foot in this group though.
Group 3 consists of people who are too stupid to engage with or deliberately lie and misrepresent things as fact when they are not and there really is no point engaging with them at all. shull, Dickson, hiram and a small number of others are in this group. @FTOF has the rest of his feet in this group as well.
There's a 4th group that I fall into that don't give a single f**k about your graphs
-
2 hours ago, oaksoft said:
Good for her. That generation won't sit around waiting to be patronised and controlled by the likes of you.
The industry I work in has been decimated. Jobs already lost all over the place. My work has cut 450k from the forecast until the end of April and were already seeing the lowest paid members of staff on the weakest contracts get cut or binned completely.
99 per cent of the people in the industry would survive this virus, but places are closing to protect that generation and others who are not so well placed to deal with a new virus. But I'm glad you think it's good of them to do what the f**k they want.
Plenty of small businesses will never open after this, some big ones too. But your right. Let the old f**kers go to the butcher while people are losing jobs because of recommendations not to go to pubs, restaurants etc.
-
2 minutes ago, antrin said:
Nothing will be announced by SPL/SFA till after sevco get desperately needed cash in.
IE after the match v Celtic on Sunday
Sevco's survival is the vital thing, here.You don't mean the sfa do whatever they can to help them surely. It's not like they had a game rescheduled 24 hours later or anything 😂
-
9 minutes ago, faraway saint said:
Methinks he'll need to rethink his strategy. 😂😂😂
With any luck hell try and find some on the motorway
-
1 hour ago, Lord Pityme said:1 hour ago, St.Ricky said:The man is dopey. No interest or understanding beyond post building.
Ricky.... f**k off.
He's only trying to make friends 😂
-
General nonsense for this pish
-
5 hours ago, St.Ricky said:
The Plan
Absolutely stellar as usual ricky..... Eh I mean shite. Absolutely shite
-
3 minutes ago, antrin said:
Anther game of two halves at Firhill.
Thank f**k...
Did we play Partick as well tonight?
-
29 minutes ago, bazil85 said:
my original point was BTB is over 120% of financial plan. I clarified this in the second point. People don’t need to believe it but that’s simply true. Do you genuinely think I don’t know 1,100 odd is less than 120% of a 1,000 target? It’s basic maths.
Now your twisting and saying 1100 is less than 120% of the plan.
What you originally said was it was 120% AHEAD of the plan Which would be 2200.
As I said, you meant 20% ahead.
Your post that I quoted was factually wrong however you twist it.
Again. That is a fact.
-
19 minutes ago, bazil85 said:
BTB is currently over 120% ahead of original plan. That is complete fact. If anyone wants to interpret that different fine, it isn’t my issue.
No its not. Its 20% over the original plan of 1000 members at 12 per month(possibly} , not 120%. The membership numbers as you originally stated are however not 20% over the original plan, never mind 120%.
Either way your post that I've quoted is factually wrong.
That, my friend. Is complete fact.
-
1 minute ago, bazil85 said:
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-
2 minutes ago, ford prefect said:
Anyone remember the 1993 b and q cup final against Falkirk? That open terracing in wind, rain, then sleet was the coldest and wettest I've ever been at a football game. Result didn't help either
Funnily enough I was just thinking that. Probably my first memory of being at a game. Jacket soaked right through
-
Whatever way anybody voted the outcome being so clear is probably a good thing. By rough calculations the yes votes make just over 66% of total membership which was what a few were arguing to be the required amount.
-
15 hours ago, St.Ricky said:
Thanks Mykey.
The story was then that his own bank normally made charges for accepting cash and coin and the manager approached Oaky to mention this. Oakys wife goes in and no mention is made. Oakey keeps sending her in and do avoiding paying the fees.
f**king hell ya clown. It wasn't about charges. It was about not accepting deposits of less than a full bag of coins.
You've got to be at it.
-
3 hours ago, Brilliant Disguise said:
SMISA current have over 25% of shares. This technically allows them to have this magic “veto” that everyone keeps alluding to.
The new deal appears to have a veto drawn up in a legal agreement to allow them to block more than what would be deemed normal under company operating structures. Something which is not there now for smisa. At the moment smisa as a 25% shareholder have the right to block special resolutions. The question being asked I believe is why are kibble being afforded more power than this.
-
9 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:
but before that was in the manager of the BOS branch
Hope he wore a condom!
-
I can't tell if this thread is comedy gold or absolutely tragic 😂
-
1 hour ago, Sweeper07 said:
You just need to believe - a wee hat-trick and he would manage it.
Got a double last time against them... but time is running out
A hat trick would've taken him to 8 ya f**king crackpot 😂
-
1 minute ago, div said:
Yes sorry, I meant through the transition period.
I don't doubt that 3 way veto would be benificial in that period, afterwards there is absolutely no reason for it that benefits smisa though
-
8 hours ago, div said:
The veto clause is as much to protect SMiSA, and the club, as it is to protect the interests of Kibble.
It only affects the following explicit decisions;
- appointments or removals of a director of the club
- the sale of the stadium, changes to the club’s name, colour or badge, changing the club’s grass pitch to astroturf, and the appointment of major sponsors;
- any major borrowings, major contracts outwith the normal course of business, and approval of the club’s business plan;
- any major structural changes to St Mirren as a company, such as any reorganisation of its share capital, or changes to the club’s articles of association.
I think that's all pretty fair.
The major sponsors one is the only one I'd have any concerns about but again I'd assume the clause is in there to protect SMiSA and the club as much as it is to protect Kibble. Be very easy to email SMiSA and ask for clarification.
Why would the veto protect smisa as much as kibble(I see someone replied similar, but the veto isn't only for the interim period}) when GLS is out and smisa have 51% what do they need protected from? This seems strange int erms of usual company structures. The veto is Only there to the benefit of kibble, no one else.
-
If its a good deal, why can smisa not buy the shares, have a vote and sell some to kibble and the money would then go into St mirren. Smisa are seemingly ahead of target with extra money in the bank. Smisa balance would decrease St mirren would increase. Would fit with the aims of smisa IMO.
ETA not even sure if that makes any sense actually 😂
-
2 questions here.
What will kibble provide that St mirren or smisa can't avhieve any other way?
If the deal is a good one, why not hold off until smisa buy the shares, then have the vote, sell a shareholding to kibble, which would then give a boost to the bank balance which could be used as the rainy day fund
-
20 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said:
Show me a previous discussion which ended without you having the last word.
Bet you can't!
With any poster
Coronavirus
in General Nonsense
Posted
What you on about? He said it perfectly correctly. Regardless of the words he used. Your just too stupid to understand what he meant of course.