Jump to content

Mykey

Saints
  • Posts

    733
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mykey

  1. Wasn't the decision to allow 16/17 year olds a one off?
    Is it certain they would be allowed a vote again? 
    It doesn't matter the demographic IMO, it's the numbers that matter.
    There was similar "beliefs" before the last referendum, that didn't work out too well for the angry "yes" voters.
    Again, whatever happens means little to me, if it goes the way I prefer, great, if not, I'll live.
    The angst and anger generated buy some is startling and not healthy.
    I'm not a hundred percent sure, but I think 16/17 year olds vote at holyrood and council elections in Scotland now, so yes they'd definitely vote in indyref 2.
  2. Tbh I’d rather Scotland get there through a proper route. After a 22 year absence from a tournament this would be an embarrassing way to re-enter.
    To be fair, it didn't do Denmark any harm, drafted in at the last minute and won the tournament.
  3. I don't know what to say to you CS.
    Maybe we hang around in different types of circles.
    In 2014 we had No politicians saying "The only way to guarantee staying in the EU is to vote No".
    We agree on that.
    Where we disagree is that I find it completely inconceivable that an intelligent person would leave it at that without responding "Hang on. If the Tories win next year, we'll be having an EU referendum anyway within a couple of years and if we vote to leave we'll be out of the EU anyway". You seem to be suggesting that because the EU referendum car crash wasn't sitting right in front of our noses that it wasn't relevant to even consider it. To me it is utterly bizarre to not think ahead a little to see potential scenarios like that but if that's the thought process you had then fair enough. I can assure you that it was a very real possibility and plenty of people up here were talking about it even if you weren't.
    Sorry to butt in on this discourse but I think the you're both right if that helps, yes the mention of a referendum on EU membership was floated but it wasn't party policy for any mainstream party, the better together campaign were able to make this claim specifically because the French and Spanish stated that an independent Scotland would have to leave the EU and re-apply and may be refused. This was self interest of course because of Catalan and Basque claims. Both have now said that they would welcome an independent Scotland as circumstances have changed due to Brexit. Complaining now is a bit like complaining about the claim on the Brexit bus - it was lazy and partisan journalism that all claims in a campaign aren't necessarily tested.
  4. If what Boris is refusing to deny is true :rolleyes: the DUP better get greased up ...:booty
    Johnson refuses to rule out Northern Ireland staying in customs union
    the "gammon" leaning Daily Express is outraged...
    Boris offering Northern Ireland as ‘sacrificial lamb’ as he looks set to backtrack on deal
     
    If this turns out to be true, every nation gets what it voted for except Scotland, England & Wales - Leave and N.I. - remain. Another gift to the independence movement.
  5. I've enjoyed this thread, though I haven't until now contributed, it has, on the whole been well argued and interesting. For the sake of stopping it going down the pan in an endless " he said, she said" pointless argument I would have to say that Slarti at no point said what people need, and Jaybee, you'll have to just accept that and admit it, otherwise let's crack on with one of our better threads. Probably about time for some Jung or Neitsche quotes.

  6. I think there is 2 ways of thinking, firstly the manager identifies targets and gives his targets to the board/dof/CEO, to get contracts signed. In which case I don't see the point in Gus, or secondly, the DOF identifies targets and pursues contracts and has JG as head coach in which case I don't see why we haven't signed anyone so far as a change of manager wouldn't affect recruitment. Maybe I'm cynical or maybe Gus's appointment is just jobs for pals, bottom line is that the current set up isn't serving smfc very well.

  7. I am not remotely ITK so this is just hypothesis, perhaps OK wants to return to Coleraine but has 2 years on his contract, Coleraine could not afford to buy that out. Is it then possible that OK is not trying to get a payoff but just to leave without Coleraine having to pay compo they can't afford. We would just need to see how far he'd go to facilitate that.

  8. It's not really an argument though is it? I believe our chairman, others think he's lying. 
    Oh gosh, your right, thank you for you insightful, well reasoned, and detailed argument. Please accept my apologies for not realising earlier how right you've been throughout, l must have been blinded by cynisism. Especially as you have clearly taken on board other people's views, I shall never darken your door again for I am not worthy of your consideration.
  9. I think he was miss-guided with police reports, media coverage and the likes on that (possibly I don't know enough about it) but yes it didn't show him or the club in the best light. I am only referring to the 10% comment though. 
    Miss-guided, and the likes, etc etc spin spin spin - you asked if he was a liar, and yes he is, your spinning it just like GLS is spinning the bigot brothers figures. he made the decision, rightly or wrongly and now he's trying to justify his stance.
×
×
  • Create New...