Jump to content

TediousTom

Saints
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,070

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

 Content Type 

Posts posted by TediousTom

  9. SFA Against Homophobia In Football

    in Other Football

    Posted

    Just now, faraway saint said:

    Have a wee re-read Tom, slight edit to your original post. :wink:

     

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     

    I was away googling Anton's sexuality as well!!!!!!!  What I did find find was that his brother might not have been too happy

  10. SFA Against Homophobia In Football

    in Other Football

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

    We did have, Ferdinand. 

    But we don't now.........so my point still stands so it does right

     

    Actually I was unaware that Anton Ferdinand was openly gay, thats actually very positive as it clearly wasnt a big enough deal.  

     

    Still the apparent lack of gay footballers does illustrate an issue so clearly football still has some way to go.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  13. Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    Be very wary people, be very wary indeed.

     

    Lets assume for a moment that the "people from Kibble" are being genuine in this wonderful proposal (they really might be).  That is wonderful, Kibble will be the bestest pals we ever had.  The club and Kibble will hang out together and all will be rosy in the garden of Paisleyshire.  Together the Smisa top dogs and the Kibble bastions can happily back slap one and other all the way to Asda and back.  Such happy frolicking as mutual admiration allows everyone to feel warm, secure and snug.

     

    Now lets think for a moment about the "people from Kibble".  These wonderful people who profess to shit black and white will not be in post forever.  You see that's the thing about employee's, at some point they leave, move up or retire.

     

    So what happens when the next generation of "people from Kibble" come along?  What happens when they are ruthless, crabbit arseholes who care not for the petty bickerings of Smisa?  What happens when the next generation of "people from Kibble" have no respect for even Smisa premium members and Smisa no longer have the free reign that it was supposed to?  What happens when the authority of the almighty Smisa premium top dogs is diluted by the huffy Kibble people?  What happens when Smisa is hamstrung to the extent that it is less efficient in carrying out its role as a Theresa May promised Brexit?

     

    Don't be fooled by voting away your influence.  Utter fools.

  15. Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    One could seek to turn this pitiful little debate on its head

     

    If Kibble are so great (they arent) and if Kibble and our club are so well matched why do Kibble not just buy the club and Smisa can just f**k off?  In fact what do Smisa bring to the party, especially when the great Kibble are seeking to dine at it?

    Smisa would not appear to know its arse from its elbow and seeking to make such significant changes to its model so late in the day suggests to me that Smisa are unfit for purpose.

     

    But hey who cares, some of you have your names on a wall!!!!!!!!

     

     

  16. Potential questions for Kibble proposal meeting 6/2/20

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    24 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

    LPM can’t comprehend the nature of this, in that members will be voting in favour or against. It’ll be their choice & their choice alone if this proposal goes through. They aren’t getting the wool pulled over their eyes, they’re getting asked a question. Same as the £50k pitch funding. 

    I think he does, in fact from reading his posts on this matter I am sure he does.

     

    LPM is the only person bringing this matter into the limelight.  So what does that say for the other Smisa members?

     

     

  18. Kirk Broadfoot

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    27 minutes ago, Sonny said:

     

    As Wank Wank Broadfoot was under contract neither him nor his agent were in a legal position to contact another club. The first contact was a phone call from Wank Wank Broadfoot to Goodwin. Goodwin was furious (his word in his late night interview on Radio Scotland).  Wank Wank Broadfoot made it clear he no longer wanted to be at St Mirren citing domestic reasons. When Goodwin calmed down he told him to go as he did not want a bad influence in the dressing room and he was a highly paid employee to play in the reserves. But the Club demanded his signing on fee back.

    Kilmarnock nor Wank Wank Broadfoot's agent nor Wank Wank Broadfoot can legally seek a transfer when a player has 18 months left on their contract. It happens and is called tapping but it is not legal.

    Very well worded sir, very well worded indeed.

     

    Wank Broadfoot is still a rat, snake, scumbag of wankerson wank right enough.

  19. Kirk Broadfoot

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    14 hours ago, oaksoft said:

    Testing for myself.

    Wank Wank Wank Wank Wank Broadfoot.

    Test 2: Wank Wank Wank Wank Broadfoot.

    Test 3 Wanky Wank Wank Wank Broadfoot.

    Test 4: Wanky Wankerson Wank Wank Wank Broadfoot.

    ETA. Every time you edit the post it adds another wank. Genius. 🤣🤣

    This bit is my favourite.  Wankerson somehow fits well a Sunday  

     

    Perhaps we could petition Div to pin this thread for the rest of the decade?   When one feels like one has aggression to burn one could hop onto the Wank Broadfoot thread and let rip.

     

    I shall now join in.

     

    Wank, wank Labour voter type wanky Wank Broadfoot wanker, wank.  

     

    and

     

    Hey Wank Broadfoot, I hope your next turd is a Smisa meeting.  

     

    Oh that felt good, felt good indeed.

     

     

  20. Feb Fixtures (huge)

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted · Edited by TediousTom

    No question thst we have come through a tough run of games and reasonably intact as well.  A real shame we couldn't hold on to that two goal lead but hey a point wasn't bad at all.  This is where we need to kick on (and where we normally don't).  The Accies game is huge......3 points here and we can look to kick on.

  22. Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    Just now, StanleySaint said:
    20 minutes ago, TediousTom said:
    Agreed.  A lot of baw baggery has occurred in this thread.  I am nor a member nor a supporter of Smisa for this very reason.  The halfwittery in this thread shows that Smisa could not possibly be fit for purpose with such a low calibre of member.  Christ its like listening to Labour voters!!!!!
     
    The OP often posts self obsessed urine, however the opening post in this very thread appears to be well thought out, well constructed and entirely reasonable.  As such it deserves debate.
     
    Kibble is a privately owned business and a privately owned business is not in this for the common good....for those stupid enough not to realise this then I plead with you to type no longer as your stupidity cheapens us all.  Gordon Scott is an astute man, that why he can afford daft looking cars.  Those who command the Kibble business probably drive daft cars as well.  The only trustworthy men in daft cars are clowns and Popes and I dont trust them Popes.
     
    So to Smisa members I ask this of you.  Take this seriously or f**k off.  Your current child like behaviour is not worthy of our club oh and your wall is shite.  Seriously what kind of adult spunks money on a list engraved on a wall that is not a war memorial?  Wankers.  The wall is a list of wankers.
     
     

    Highly unhelpful post, there is a serious matter requiring debate/clarification not including clown car baw baggery of a tedious nature, thanks for your contribution

    Your name is so on that wall

  23. Kibble/SMiSA Partnership Proposal (Merged)

    in General St. Mirren Discussion

    Posted

    51 minutes ago, portmahomack saint said:

    Too many people on here are far to quick to disregard everything he says,  As The Boy Who Cried Wolf.  One day that's going to bite you in the arse 

    Agreed.  A lot of baw baggery has occurred in this thread.  I am nor a member nor a supporter of Smisa for this very reason.  The halfwittery in this thread shows that Smisa could not possibly be fit for purpose with such a low calibre of member.  Christ its like listening to Labour voters!!!!!

     

    The OP often posts self obsessed urine, however the opening post in this very thread appears to be well thought out, well constructed and entirely reasonable.  As such it deserves debate.

     

    Kibble is a privately owned business and a privately owned business is not in this for the common good....for those stupid enough not to realise this then I plead with you to type no longer as your stupidity cheapens us all.  Gordon Scott is an astute man, that why he can afford daft looking cars.  Those who command the Kibble business probably drive daft cars as well.  The only trustworthy men in daft cars are clowns and Popes and I dont trust them Popes.

     

    So to Smisa members I ask this of you.  Take this seriously or f**k off.  Your current child like behaviour is not worthy of our club oh and your wall is shite.  Seriously what kind of adult spunks money on a list engraved on a wall that is not a war memorial?  Wankers.  The wall is a list of wankers.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...