stlucifer

First couple of touches didn't fill me with confidence but he calmed down as the game progressed.

A routine win as it turnned out. I felt the manager should have given Mandron 10 mins or so to try getting his hat trick. Strain is just too good. I thought we lost the midfield for much of the second half after O'Hara left the field. We have done the bare minimum of qualifying out of a group we should have so we move on.

And in other news. The Titanic has sunk.

That was strange as my missus never had a problem with it any other time we went. She was allowed her collapsible one so maybe the same at our ground.

I think I can guarantee one out of two for you. Bring a brolly.

I left it late but still got our own seats. By the looks of it this will be a very small crowd but who could blame them after the last game.

ETA. WHat it comes down to is you believe the unproven account. I am not so certain. I just don't know so all I'm saying is, enough is enough. Hounding someone because the court of the "righteous" want to get their pitchforks out isn't for me.

I was speaking purely of the numbers so I suppose it's a moot point now.

We probably won't be worse off from Declan then. I still think we need a backup.

You've hit the nail on the head mate. No one except the three in the room know what certainly happened and there is NO real evidence. I feel that all three have suffered but I don't know who, if any, lied. It really could be the case that all honestly think their telling the truth. Their version of reality.

Accept it or agree with it? No matter how it turned out if it came to an actual trial, I'm honestly not sure BoK would really put his pitchfork down. He's got the bit between his teeth and decided Goodwillie and co are the devil incarnate. As I have said, (perhaps ad nauseam so this will be the last time), I don't know what happened and we might never know but I am not convinced anyone should suffer a life of misery for what basically comes down to an opinion.

I read that wrong. Or did I?🙄 Sounds like the players didn't turn up again.

I would hope so. If Joe had still been here I wouldn't be bothered but we're already short of numbers and I don't think Gogic is the answer.

Unless we get a replacement this would be a really bad move for the club.

The only proof I've given is that they were ALL drunk. As for the rest. It's not conclusive that she DID have memory blackouts or that she didn't at least give the impression that she was cognitive. Only that some people can be in such a state. Even if that were the case. I don't know what happened in that flat. Neither did the judge. His point is that he THINKS it MORE likely that what the girl says is what happened. What he calls "evidence" is, IMO, circumstantial. He needs to listen to the people involved and decide who he believes. It really is as simple as that. My point is. In my opinion. There is not enough proof to ruin a mans life and lively-hood forever.

Or simply an erotic, drunken dream? 🤣

FFS. You really have it in for these guys. It's a fact that there is NO evidence against them. It is the definition of They said, she said. The only FACT is that they were ALL drunk. What happened in that room is something you DEFINITELY don't know. Your belief in this journalist more than proves you have decided in your own head of their guilt. It's not just the fact one man made the decision. It's also on what basis the decision was made. It could come down to who's the better lair. Who has the better lawyer. What the judge thought about the individuals on a personal level. All manner of things could have influenced that judge. What is CERTAIN is that no one outside that room could be certain of what happened in that room. Has it ever occurred to you that, if Goodwillie WAS guilty he could have made some sort of statement of contrition to appease the fork carriers like yourself. What you consider definite proof is nothing of the sort. You seem to be at the front of the queue in the witch hunt trying to drive this guy either mad or to an early grave. Don't forget his family too.

You are making assumptions based on ONE judge's opinion. Glasgow United say it best. "How can he show contrite or remorse for something he staunchly claims he did not do?" They added: "We do a lot of work in our community helping those in need and this is only an extension of that work. "We are supporting David with his mental health and will continue to do so. This witch hunt has gone on for far too long and the use of any person's life as a political football is unacceptable." ETA. As for the second statement. It changes NOTHING as far as the burden of proof is concerned so how can they decide to prosecute at the behest of, again, ONE judge's opinion? Get real buddy.

We play Cowdenbeath, then Forfar. I don't want to play Montrose again. The trauma that might cause!

Read between those lines. At the end of the day. In a criminal court the defendant doesn't need to provide any evidence of innocence. In a civil case they do. Therefore they NEED to justify why they believe they are not guilty. Quite a big difference

I believe the term "Mic" simply comes from the fact Irish surnames are usually Mc whereas Scots surnames are "Mac" so I can't see where this term can be deemed a slur.

There is no Airport in Glasgow though.

I say again. I am not passing judgement either way but... Has it never occurred to you that the very reason he has shown no remorse is because he didn't actually commit the crime?