rea

mm....will need to try and find something on this, sounds a bit weird though

Faith is the assurance of things hoped for the conviction of things not seen....i think both of us are equally displaying this only yours is in the scientific method providing a solution mine is (as it happens) actually in both,

dont think so, the existence of a zero point energy at a theoretical 0K is why energy is still in the system and hence entropy is not zero, this kenetic energy cannot be removed by further cooling, as you cannot find a coolant that would cool as that is circular, maybe i have remembered this incorrectly, but i dont think i have, happy to be directed to an article that clarifies the science if you have access to one

i hope to read your post from this side first!

well always keep an open mind, and listen to your dreams, overcoming inertia is mans greatest weakness IMHO

you want to have a look at a thing called Pasals wager......though not on the William Hill website. what i believe you would call what you many people experience is a thing termed the "idea of the numinuous" coined by a guy called Rudolph Otto....who never played for Dortmund. There are three components to this which you can read about or not.....the key thing is what you chose to do with this insight....and thats us back to Pascals wager

ok exactly where did you study thermodynamics? Myself at University and it is all about equilibrium In Physics more "disorder" as you call it results in less complexity as the disorder as such is the break down of everything to a constituent level e.g heat death, which means everything we know that is complex eg the pc in front of you eventually eventually ends up in its least complex heat death state. so to put it simply you are wrong, about the disorder = complexity, it is exactly the reverse, from a physics point of view

Splendid, so hopefully get well above 200 asap as there are at least that number SMISA members? you just have to watch what you are actually saying about what it costs to be a SMISA member is it £12 or is it £2,

You never come across Boltzmann Brains then? I think there are two main issues at the heart of generally accepted evolutionary theory, and i include cosmological evolution in this 1. what would appear to be the fine tuning of the universe for life and the scientific run in the direction of a impossibly provable M theory/ multiverse which because of the lack of a causal link could not be proved from this universe, thus is certainly science reaching for the faith bucket 2. the complexity problem (though Boltzmann noted above had some thoughts on this) we appear to see the universe tending to equilibrium (2nd law of thermodynamics etc) we see this everywhere, in the universe at large as it expands and cools to the cup of hot coffee on your desk that also gets cold....everywhere except in biological evolution where if you leave the "building blocks" stuff gets more complex, this has yet to be completely explained, and in an Occams Razor type way as science progresses it is starting to look at lot more like faith on a macro level so maybe faith would be the simplest solution. N.B i think it is the point of the differentiation of species that the point 2 above has the most issue. Darwins theories point 1 to 7a all read fine to me it is 7b i think runs up against some of the above

question as the above comment has raised a bit of confusion for me. The shares and the money will be owned by SMISA and so all members of SMISA will vote on what happens with what it owns. I assumed therefore that all members of SMISA would need to upgrade to at least £12 per month, but looking at the above is this the case or are some current SMISA members not going to be paying at least £12 per month and yet remain SMISA members? and leading on from that of the £12 per month what proportion of that actually goes to make you a SMISA member...bearing in mind what it currently costs?

"It has been proven that the building blocks of life can spontaneously arise from non-life" so basically non life can come from non life.....no problem with that

nope...was hoping for a quick summary, been away for 3 weeks

Could you tell me where to look for this proof please?

And closes... https://youtu.be/9esWG6A6g-k None of this matched grip nonsense

What is in your set?

Karen Carpenter Buddy Rich Stuart Copland

There are but Chick was, back in the day a Club 1877 prospective member at £3000 so should certainly be open to pursuasion

To be fair they are not....two very different people

Will depend on if all the work has been contracted correctly. The construction industry has standard forms of contract hopefully it was done either using one of these or the Club notified their insurance company about the work so that work in progress was covered. Time will tell.

no but as someone once said you will know that the buck stop with "you me and him in West 3"

but would Tommy Craig, Murray or the shop have happened under FO....dont think so