insaintee

Do you think they'll even be able to apply looks like the might have no players and Green and Smith squaring up like two bald men fighting over a comb

when I open it the options are whited out. I cant see which is yes and which is no. Will try a again at home with my own computer. (has a better browser than this work lap top). I was guessing that no was the bottom button but did not dare vote incase it was the other way round.

Because we live in a totally corrupt Putocracy, where the job of courts is to stuff cash in rich mens trousers.

This only gets better! Lets see Walter and Greene have a square go over who get scumgers. My money's on Greene, He looks like he's got a flickknife in his coat pocket. Seriously if these two (and who knows who else is going to reemerge) get down to it this could run for ages. No way will the scum be out of Admin in time for the new season. And No way will the new co be in a position to apply for SPL membership. Walter who would have thought you'd be the one to finally kill them

This has a lot more entertainment value in it. For one thing Whyte still has a floating charge on Ibrox and Murry parlk (expect court action) and if Green claims that new co are Rangers FC then Ticketus can claim they are owed the tickets. SFA newco and Agents arguing about registration. SFA and SPL votes on expulsion etc. New arguments about shirt sales and catering This will go on and on.

Then he's even stupider then he looks. No way will he get away with this

i saw another site claming the wee barrel as the oldest site.. I though I saw something about the Abercorn origionally being owned by the marquise of Abercorn but cant find it. (Google does not have all the answers)

One thing to make clear Ibox Murry park and the Player registrations are not ASSETS they are LIABILITIES. Rangers in their pre f**ked form could not afford them and ran up a £20million deficit in i year. Even if the worst happens and the scum are back in next year, we will have all this to enjoy all over again.

I know,, I just "like" everything today!

For the wife and kids yes but for the rest of his gangster crew no. But in some ways I think you'd be saying their better of without the scum. Yes there are some decent fans out there (my son and father-in-law) so I will respect their grief and won't be sending them taxts and emails. But I won't be pretending to be sad either

You also have to remember that a newco has to be a member of the SFA. While the newco would not have the punishment for bring the game into disrepute, it would stil be "associated" with the old club and would have to rely on the good will of the SFA to get a license. Good luck on that boys

BOOOO! It's like you have a disgusting violent ganster neighbour who gets aids and dies in agony. I have no sympathy the genuinely vile supporters of Rangers

Sonny you said this was the oldest pub in paisley. I would have thought the Abercorn would have been older. Any thoughts

If Kings £20 million claim is up held then he can block the CVA on his own. Bye Bye rangers

One F in pound! Then F*ckem

What a kicking that Aberdeen guy gave scumgers on Radio Scotland today. I guess we know which way they'll be voting on newco. By the way he reckoned that only 300 cancelled season tickets was equal to the value of rongers in the SPL..

I always thought the statue on the masonic temple on the high street was Robert the Bruce. The things you learn on this thread eh!

What size was the (ahem) tip

I'm guesing the YMCA at the corner of hew street

from the Rankers rumours website 08 Jun 2012 13:18:19 CVA to be accepted but with a string of conditions! I was told this morning by a taxi man who does the airport that main creditors are prepared to accept the CVA but that they will impose a load of conditions to maximise the return for creditors. He heard them talking about it in his cab. A deal will be done and we're out of admin but if we don't deliver to creditors we're back in Admin again in 3 months. Best news I heard since we won in the Court of Session last week. Saved at the last minute . I knew it would work out ok in the end. Happy days Shull your a very naughty man

totally correct mate the CVA is basically legalized robbery. The sale of the players would raise more cash than the the total amount. Also the CVA money would not arrive all up frount but in drips and drabs. If Greene puts the club back into administration then the creders would once again be looking at a pence in the pound settlement. I don't doubt that was Greens plan. Buy the club on a promise sell the players, then go back into administration and give the creditors a pence in the pound settlement on £5million. When you look at it in black and white I almost wish greene would get his CVA accepted. It would be hilarious to watch scumgers go back into admin and ahave a repeat of this next year. Although it is starting to get a bit boring

The problem any investor has is that Rongers run at a £10 million oer annum loss. There are realtively few cost cutting oppertunities. Reducing the player wage bill is likely to see them fall behind "other" teams which will reduce their profitability. Equally there are relatively few new income strands. Uping the price of season tickets, or player sales will again impact profitability. D7P should have tried to demonstrate that there was a potentially profitable buisness there and they have manifestly failed to do that. So any investor in rongers needs to budget on a £10 million per annum loss for the short term. With no credit facilities that would meed going back into administation pretty quick unless someone has deep pockets. This is why Greene is the only "bidder" and basicallyy he is just dicking around. What has become crystal clear is that in their current set up Rongers are not viable. The only way out I can see is playing a youth team in the 3rd diviision and ground sharing with Partic thistle

There's more than that. There is all the Debentures TBC. My dad bought his house about 10 years ago from someone with the same Surname. He recently recieved a letter asking him if he wished to accept the CVA as the previous occupier had been a debenture holdier. The guy is deed and has been for about 15 years. I wonder how many of the debenture holders are still around. I believe the debenture is no transferable (but don't know for sure). Their inclusion on the CVA is a blatent attempt to load the dice in D&P's favour.

half of your subject matter that you specialise in would be wiped out And that would be brilliant for us