antrin

I know it wasn't an opinion - but it was an inaccurate statement. There is truth - and there are those who wish to have us not believing in it. Did the club membership lapse? That is another waffly question. When Rangers went into liquidation, its membership of the SPL (as was the structure at the time) went to Dundee who had been relegated. So I guess the answer is a simple NO, it was transferred to a legitimate club which took that NEWLY-VACATED place in the SPL.

Perfectly correct, CS. Neither Clydebank nor Wimbledon actually died - unike the deid club. Which is DEAD. It is also perfectly correct and more than acceptable for all other fans to treat sevco fans as newbies who are unjustifiably wanting to be seen as some revered institution. While I can somewhat admire their willingness to throw good money after bad with every lie they are told and believe, there is no remorse shown for the failures to pay tax and National Insurance, there is no remorse for the years of EBT CHEATING of all other clubs and none for us mug fans at the time for still turning up to support a rigged sport. As I mentioned above - they think they can attach themselves to the good stuff and - as in the case quoted below, today - claim to have absolutely no connection whatsoever to the bad stuff done by the deid club. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-44126217. Having cake and eating it - just disnae work. The only thing Lost Ud got right was the Armageddon nonsense. St Mirren picked up a league cup during Armageddon...

There's no debate. There's devious dissembling, lying and an attempted cover-up versus a pursuit of the simple truth.

My heart sank at the w/e, when I read a post from a Shellic fan saying, "Lewis played a blinder for the final period of the game". I thought. " that's something I'll just have to get used to". I also thought - it makes sense for Rodgers to give him a run oot, at the end of the season, in a meaningless match for him to be introduced to the Green faithful... Soon after, I realised the fan was talking about Lewis, the Dons goalie, no' Oor Lewis! No' yet...

Well.... I never copied and pasted all the dreary shite that I posted....

Linwood Buddie (I'm guessing you're only quoting the bollocks from some Mainstream mouthpiece, but they tell lies...) "Rangers won the Scottish Premier League at the end of season 2010-11 and featured in European competition at the start of the following season. Rangers then entered administration in 2012 and eventually started season 2012-13 in the fourth tier of Scottish football. " Untrue. Rangers could not possibly start season anything in any tier of Scottish football as it had died due to having gone bust. An off-the shelf- company was bought (Sevco 5088) and then was renamed as a new club in order to buy some Assets (only the good bits - like the grun - NOT the debts, not the history) of old Rangers, which was allowed to die... due to its overspending on players and not paying its taxes. Its fans never rallied round to save it. Unlike those of say, Hearts and Saints... The newly named company/club/clumpany called The Rangers owned and run by a company called Rangers International Football Club was allowed into the 4th division entirely against the standing rules for entry to that division. That was part of the fix by Reagan and Co to get out of accepting the lies from the old deid club that are now causing the results of this review to be made public.

There is no misdirection - and unlike your comments - no abuse from me. I don't really care. You can have the last word for now. I won't be about for a wee while.

I can see little value to me tinkering with anything I've written when shull has absolutely no desire to be reasonable. He certainly doesn't appear to be the least interested in any attempt I might have made to alleviate his misplaced feelings of anger. There's no sign of him feeling even the least bit repentant about all the nasty things he typed and aspersions he has cast on me (and many others) over the past couple of months. I actually thought that once he realised how raw and hurtful indefensible insults might be, he might think twice about being so nasty. It hurts, so I reacted. The stuff below doesn't ask for healing... So I have reacted, once again.... sigh... I never lose it. That would be silly. You certainly do. That's why I come across as reasonable and you come acrossTrumpish... could say with the emphasis on pish, bit would be sinking to your level YOU have been the proactive one throughout this. I don't need to spend the time on here that makes you seemingly happy. I react to what you type. This post is precisely that - a mere reaction to your shite. I suggested long ago, that abusing me wasn't a good thing for you to do. But you will persist. You have posted worse and show no signs of remorse or ever attempted to make the person you have abused feel at all at ease. You've always thought abuse was a great laugh - until now.

I can do.... but it would be to deny that he made a series of posts about little girls scweeming and scweeming etc... As your his pal and you flatter me - and he seems SO hurt - I'll see what I can do. If I can find the post, later. .. This is me, mid-cooking,,,,

Well, you may have missed this - but I have had him on ignore only to find out from others that he (and skidmark) sneakily slagged me off, more than once. So I'm retaliating in my odd spare moment. Is that wrong?

Honestly!! I know you're a pal, but do you genuinely think that shull and fs have NOT been bullying, twisting reality and telling lies? There has been several Buddies agreeing and pointing my same assertions out. They have been harassed on here, by those two.

I NEVER ever asserted that he is a paedophile - you are believing his twisted understanding of it. He posts so many words to hide and pervert all reality. You will see that before me, HE posted several times about little girls scweeming and scweeming and scweeming which - as my post above attests - I found rather troubling. I merely used HIS " little girl scweeming and scweeming and scweeming" and ran with it. If HE finds it a not nice way to talk, then he should have been careful about using such an image. I didn't like it. My response was limited - using his imagery. eg I didn't run scweeming and scweeming to a Moderator. The sole time/s I have done so is about illegal ageist comments I hope that helps? It should.

Sorry, shull. That's just more Trumpish gibberish to which I can make no logical response. But, as I see you can't let sleeping dogs lie... you may have the last word, tonight. Go on, then. I have a life...

it's not flounders that I've hooked . This is General Nonsense. If you and your acolytes REALLY MUST, you can do your inane posts for my benefit on here. That would be best for all, I think. Please ignore me on all other threads.

Hell isnae likely to freeze over. Or is this more fake news like global warming, Donald, er... sorry shull.

btw, THIS is exactly what you should have done when I suggested it a fortnight ago. I was there to help.

A madman who has a ‘thought’ and immediately sticks it onto social media, bite-size. There’s never a complete, coherent thought rationally presented in one post, but garbled and followed up almost immediately by another bite-size rabid ramble. And then another post/tweet And another post/tweet… In ever-decreasing circles… All suffused with a refusal to recognise the truth combined with a desire to twist the facts into the opposite shape from reality. Presenting himself and his Buddies as the suffering, ill-done by, bullied victims of nasty people. Anyone else who tries to point out that the opposite has been the case is accused of being less than honest. This is the doublethink that George Orwell warned against. Fake News being pushed out by Trump/shull troubles me, bigly. We just need to persist with truth and honesty and hope that, one day, reality will once again stalk the Earth.

No - my choice to not submit to your bollox could ever be regarded as a wrong choice. (It's boring for everyone else, but, again that's all down to you.) It's you who's out of control and have been for some time. I have right on my side. I gave you the chance to ignore me and not post any more insults, slags, aspersions, character abuse and I would ignore you but you and your wee gang chose to ignore that advice. You thought you were being sleekit and getting away with it. You haven't. I won't keep quiet, let you away with the shit and just vanish. I will and have responded. One post to your dozen, but mine are quality. (btw, I've noticed a whiny, pleading tone sneaking into your posts. Does "Getting dealt with elsewhere" mean you want YOUR Mod pal to do your dirty work and shut me up?)

What precisely was atrocious about noting your recent obsession of posting about young girls, scweeming and scweeming and scweeming? It certainly wasn't me who introduced the obsession. In truth, I found it more disturbing than your usual abuse. Responsibility for your abusive language all lies in your own clammy hands

1-0 Black & White Army‏ @bawarmy 15s15 seconds ago Gavin Reilly curls into the top left corner of the net from the edge of the box.

Saints corner headed away by the colts... yawn....

Fair dos. you should get access in that case.

You can't get it in the UK, paul. Unless you mask your IP Address and pretend you're no in Paisley... THAT's the 'restricted access'. It's not for the likes of us Buddies.

You're the saddo - going on and on and on. I do one post in retaliation for about each of your 50. I have a life outside this forum, you see.

Careful, LPM... shull will "scweem and scweem and scweem". "He seems to have a new obsession for small girls." Apparently shull has seen the above sentence as me thinking he actually was a paedophile rather than me simply referring to his baffling earlier posts about little girls scweeming and scweeming and stamping their feet. I still have no idea what he really was on about. I'd never dreamt of such a thing as shull being a paedophile. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm glad that shull prompted a Mod to point out how it could have been wrongly misconstrued. And that I could clear up the misunderstanding. I hope this helps?