antrin

No - my choice to not submit to your bollox could ever be regarded as a wrong choice. (It's boring for everyone else, but, again that's all down to you.) It's you who's out of control and have been for some time. I have right on my side. I gave you the chance to ignore me and not post any more insults, slags, aspersions, character abuse and I would ignore you but you and your wee gang chose to ignore that advice. You thought you were being sleekit and getting away with it. You haven't. I won't keep quiet, let you away with the shit and just vanish. I will and have responded. One post to your dozen, but mine are quality. (btw, I've noticed a whiny, pleading tone sneaking into your posts. Does "Getting dealt with elsewhere" mean you want YOUR Mod pal to do your dirty work and shut me up?)

What precisely was atrocious about noting your recent obsession of posting about young girls, scweeming and scweeming and scweeming? It certainly wasn't me who introduced the obsession. In truth, I found it more disturbing than your usual abuse. Responsibility for your abusive language all lies in your own clammy hands

1-0 Black & White Army‏ @bawarmy 15s15 seconds ago Gavin Reilly curls into the top left corner of the net from the edge of the box.

Saints corner headed away by the colts... yawn....

Fair dos. you should get access in that case.

You can't get it in the UK, paul. Unless you mask your IP Address and pretend you're no in Paisley... THAT's the 'restricted access'. It's not for the likes of us Buddies.

You're the saddo - going on and on and on. I do one post in retaliation for about each of your 50. I have a life outside this forum, you see.

Careful, LPM... shull will "scweem and scweem and scweem". "He seems to have a new obsession for small girls." Apparently shull has seen the above sentence as me thinking he actually was a paedophile rather than me simply referring to his baffling earlier posts about little girls scweeming and scweeming and stamping their feet. I still have no idea what he really was on about. I'd never dreamt of such a thing as shull being a paedophile. Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm glad that shull prompted a Mod to point out how it could have been wrongly misconstrued. And that I could clear up the misunderstanding. I hope this helps?

psst! BYK? It's complimenting not complementing. Complementing would mean I was somehow complicit in his shite and bullying - but I'm far from that. Sorry.... habit and all that.

I thought you were one of skidmark's aliases. You're doing his job on this thread. HE's the one who usually sooks the cabbies' boaby...

Very mature... No need to scweem. I'm not stalking... as you are with me. You're too insecure. I'll pick and choose a few of your mindless insults to report. Is the insecurity because I won't lie down and take your bullying pish? i asked you to ignore me, but you name call and attempt to shut me up in (probably) all your posts. i don't attempt to check so much pish. i guess you'll get Skidmark to wire in for a few posts, now? i was too late. Skidmark beat me to it!

Considering the mind-numbing number of pointless posts you flood onto the forum, I still think it's a great idea. and how insecure and childish are you to NEED to name-call in every post. Six insults in the above. now, THAT is bullying an d name-calling by a very insecure person . above all, it very disrespectful of another poster. IE. Me. i fully expect div to take action.

Nothing will change while mugs support the SFA with their money by paying to see the National team and Colt teams in a diddy cup. they'll carry on, carrying on with your support. It's depressing how many mugs are out there.

It seems that the Y in "ye" should be pronounced "th" - so it is no different from the awe-inspiring 'Come on the Saints'. when typesetting started, most letter sets for printing were made in Europe, which didn't have the vocal "th", so British type setters decided to make do/bodge with the letter y. similarly, I feel sure that the creative poz could bodge something much, much better than come on ye saintszzz.... https://johnaugust.com/2011/ye-olde-shoppe-never-existed

I guess that you, Warwick - and probably div - noticed that he was castigating name-calling whilst indulging in it! He's trying to provoke - as Bullies do. Not very respectful.

Respect must be earned. If someone abuses me, as has happened a lot from those two, then I shall speak out. I don't like bullies. Never did. Over a week ago I asked them to ignore me and I would ignore them. They treated that as a weakness which gave them chances to sleekitly slag me cos I wasn't looking. But other Buddies were looking, and alerted me, which is why I have been exercising my right of reply. They don't like it up 'em. And div, should that 'respect' you mention not also cover ageist abuse - as well as racist, sexist and homophobic stuff? That would be a nice thing - for a change.

The flaw there is... u two chancers don't keep your abuse off the forum. it should be confronted in the open and witnessed by everyBuddie.

Only because I won't lie down to twin bullying and harassment. you can't take it when someBuddie fights back and exposes your multiple deficiencies.

oooh, the irony....

I agree with Drew. i have a long history on this forum and its predecessors . I loved what it once was. I have met many good Buddies through it. for it to flourish and once again be the enjoyable beast it once was, here's another suggestion... (If the one about controlling flood posting is unworkable and if the abusive two really find it impossible to completely ignoreme, as I suggested but they found impossible...) bring back the wank tank, reincarcerate them AND ME. Seriously. i'd be happier seeing this place return to normalcy and decency - and they'd be happy venting their vile spleen and abuse on a captive audience. EveryBuddie happy! (I would, of course, ignore them and only occasionally correct their transgressions, if I could be arsed.)

Thank you. I was hoping you were still awake and it wasn't too far above your head.

Dear, oh dear. if I didn't know better, I would regard the above as a tantrum. How ironic! if I have downtime later - and can be arsed - I'll correct all that erroneous mince for you. please be patient. Find something to keep yourself occupied. I may be some time. I have a life...

I'm glad the suggestion has your approval. you were a bit hesitant in your initial posts.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Hi div... And all/any other mods of this forum... no doubt you've witnessed what a car crash this place has become. apparently, I am a big part of the problem because I refuse to accept ageist and other abuse from a minority... ok, to be honest from a duopoly. i think this place could do with being calmed down and here's my suggestion of a means by which that could be easily achieved. just as the search function has a limit on how often /quickly you can search... How about having a limit on the number of posts a person can make in a day? Ten maybe.... would be more than ample for 99% of posters. a limit of 10 would stop idiots doing several one line posts in succession and might make them not wish to squander their allocation on abusing other posters who'd like to get a word in edgeways. new, potential posters must be as put off by this current shite state of affairs as I have been. My apologies for becoming part of this problem, i've just decided to not be cowed by bullies running in packs... of two. (Sad individuals). as ever... I hope this helps?