Slarti

If???? [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

Naw. Well, mibbe. To be honest, as usual, I haven't a clue.

Sometimes it isn't. [emoji16]

Naw. [emoji2957]

Same here.

Aye, that's pretty much what I said. 🤣

Life is all about coincidences (unless, of course, everything is predetermined due to the initial state of the universe/multiverse, but that's a different argument), so for someone to say that they don't believe in them is ridiculous.

That was already there.

The app seems to be down as well, at least on my phone.

I was thinking it meant he was a space cadet. 😁

Only if "casual" means "wrong" nowadays? [emoji16]

And was a "winning top". [emoji106]

I'll sell you mine. [emoji16]

Looks legit to me, give it a go. After all, you've nothing left for them to take after that last one, what have you got to lose? [emoji16]

The replacement is a separate issue.

As I've previously agreed, dismissed can cover many things. Legally sacked equals dismissed, redundancy equals dismissed, etc. However, dismissed does not necessarily equal sacked. It's like all pigeons are birds but not all birds are pigeons.

Contract not renewed. Not a sacking, dismissal or redundancy. In my opinion he should have been offered another contract but it wasn't my decision. Depends what you mean by "right or wrong". In a football sense? In a "nice thing to do" sense? Something else?

Aye, so ye did. [emoji1787]

Being "dismissed" does not mean you have done something wrong, being "sacked" does (at least in this context, not as in, for example, putting something in a sack).

In legal terns, dismissal covers redundancy too, which is why I never argued the point. My point is that "sacked" is a layman's term not a legal one as he originally claimed. Also, dismissal is usually used with a qualifier, as I pointed out. In layman's terms, you wouldn't use "dismissed" to describe a redundancy you would use it to describe a "sacking", i.e. a dismissal for doing something wrong. Unless "sacked", "sacking" etc are used in law his whole point is moot.

I'd imagine that "sacked" isn't mentioned in law, it would be "dismissed". If you can point to the relevant law, I'll happily admit I was wrong. Sacked, to me, is a layman's term for being dismissed for doing something wrong. "Dismissed" generally means that you've done something wrong and it's usually stated, e.g. "Dismissed for gross misconduct".

I don't know why some can't understand that, you'd think that they might have an axe to grind.

Did you ask the other 20+ people who also wrote that they had been sacked/let go/relieved of their duties to confirm??? I guess not. Personally, I can't recall anyone else using "sacked" and they two other phrases do not necessarily mean "sacked". To be sacked you need to have done something "wrong" which is not necessarily the case with the other phrases.

You need to speak to Baz if it's about facts.

As long as you're not poor at keeping a boat afloat.