bazil85

You genuinely don’t think we can use any of the data from previous votes as evidence to how people will vote in the future? That’s quite an outlandish claim. Almost LPM level infact.

There’s strong evidence when you look at other similar votes and no matter what variation of vote happens, the club benefits always come through. To say that isn’t a strong evidence indicator is simply not correct. I have absolutely no fear of adding it. Not because it might win but because I have no issue with going with the will of the majority. Clearly a select few do on here but I will always go with a majority vote. Big difference between what I think will happen, what I hope will happen and my opinion on if this option did win. I know you think it’s good to save for the future. My opinion is, it’s better to spend now in the hope that our income streams are stronger in the future. We save up over the next 6-8 years and that money is the difference between as being a Championship club or an SP club, it’ll cost us way more than we could ever save. Like I say, that’s just my opinion vs yours. Neither one is right or wrong, just opinions.

You can return to the committee debate all you want. I’m not on and never have been anywhere near the committee. One of my biggest critics Mr D himself confirmed it to you. Why you hold onto this is beyond me... well actually it isn’t, given practically everything you post is made up drivel. The incident represented in GLS opinion a conflict of interest, as someone that claims to know so much about regulation, you’d think you could at least pretend to be aware of duty bound requirements to highlight COI. The only elephant in the room is your continual denial that SMFC benefits have always been the popular choice, any way you try and tart it up, they always win.

Yeah I know it does. My only point is there doesn’t appear to be an appetite for it. Will see what happens but I fear it’s a bit of a waste of time given all the available evidence.

I’m all for either of you trying to get this on the vote in any manner you please. As per usual there’s a dig from LPM about SMISA somehow doing some underhanded means when it comes to voting options. Once again not giving fellow fans credit and suggesting they aren’t savvy enough to make informed decisions. No acknowledgment to the stone cold facts right in front of us all that no matter what the options have been in the past, any variation, any form, the club benefit always wins. SMISA don’t have to be ‘sly’ to get club benefits through because that has always been and remains the popular option for voting members. I don’t think there’s ever been a vote where over 50% of voting members haven’t voted for a club benefit, last one being the closest run with a very good community benefit up against it. (51% last time for either goal posts or hand dryers)

It could, who knows. Important fact you’re possibly missing is the majority of voting members want to ‘dip SMISA coffers’ as you’ve put it. I know my mind certainly hasn’t changed with the accounts. Maybe something has changed but given the distance away previous options have been, it would need to be a massive fundamental change. I don’t see it but like I say, if I’m wrong and that’s the will of the majority, I’m happy

I’m pretty sure it’s already had it’s eight hours haha

Its mentioned Yeah but is the actual income value detailed in the income? If it’s only to May, why would they have revenue we didn’t get until end of August?

McGinn sell on wouldn’t be detailed in the accounts up to May?

Too much evidence there’s no appetite for it.

So you don’t think they’ve done anything illegal? You’d be completely correct if that’s your thought process. They are indeed, I have to say I’m surprised at the increased personnel numbers and outgoings. Still good to see we’ve turned a healthy profit. As long as we do that every year, not even the most hardened critic can complain... you’d think.

Sure does... I wouldn’t hold my breath for any money getting saved though tbh

You’re right for once... it’s exactly like deja vu. Just like last time it was shown I am not directly linked with SMISA or the club and SMISA weren’t doing anything illegal. Maybe take your complaint to the ‘FSA’ though. Might need to ask Doc Brown for a hand with that one in the first instance though

You don’t though do you? If in doubt and the straw clutching isn’t working, go back to the old faithful spinning eh?

From his comments, Dicko blew the whistle and detailed that he felt misled because they weren’t compliant with scheme rules. FCA have a duty to investigate such claims. They did and said it was a matter of dispute NOT lack of compliance. If it was only about his subs, he should have done a DDI and I told him as much in reaching out to the FCA, if there was wrongdoing it would have been investigated. Very simple Good effort though. If you feel we’re genuinely breaking the law, you realise you are duty bound to report it right? Why haven’t you?