ALBIONSAINT

I hate to Labour the point but ……

We do have knife crime which is homegrown (see bbc piece on Nottingham today) however I do think there are cultural links to certain crime’s. You don’t see many white British people attacking several random people in public places. The problem is if we are all to scared to talk about these issues because you are accused of being racist then our society will get worse over time. A prime example is the Rotherham Asian abuse gangs.

? It’s France, therefore foreigners.

Some context to the “Mad” bit above…..

What is it with mad foreigners and outdoor multiple knife carnage?

I have mental health! 😅

Personality disorder or ASD ? It’s chicken and egg stuff, probably both.

The case is very much about ASD. Reminds me of the film below, which is a must see in my opinion.

Just be careful…..😅

Get it right, it’s donuts. You having a bad day because Nicola was on with the crocodile tears? 😝

If you bothered to read the associated posts you would have learned why I didn’t.

You obviously didn’t follow the story so this question is redundant.

Or too use another anology, that toe nail looks a bit infected, best just cut the leg off just in case.

Why would you question sources from the Sun and Daily Mail? Would it misinformation? What if the Guardian or the independent printed it, would that be a reliable source? All these papers print story’s from academic sources, sometimes from the same original source.

Do you not think that the actions taken, e.g. banning CFCs, had an effect on those predictions? It may have had an effect on the issues in the New scientist article (aerosol quadrupling) however the Washington times article is concerned with the Maunder Minimum which would not be related to CFCs in the atmosphere. (See below) Given the amount of different experts telling me about the different catastrophes which are going to happen in the future, you can see why people of my generation tend to be sceptical about man made climate change.

A link would have been helpful in that case. You originally never mentioned the (missing) headline, just mentioned "warmest January" as if it was your opinion on what you had posted (i.e. the screenshot). I actually don’t know how to add a link, hence all my posts contain screenshots 😅

I thought (obviously in error) that if people wanted to read the full article they could access it themselves. You could just have taken my word for it in the first place.

You never posted the headline.

Nowhere in the article you posted does it say it's the warmest January on record, it doesn't even hint at that. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what they said. You better get to spec savers!! What does the headline say?

That's not what it says. There is a huge difference between the highest January temperature on record and the warmest January on record. The former is a recording of a single instance while the latter is the average of multiple instances over the month. Tell that to the BBC please.

Sure why not. I think I first heard about it on tomorrow’s world? On a timescale somewhere between the ozone layer disappearing and acid rain destroying the world. The timescale for the ice age has now been moved to between 2030-40 according to the Washington post article below. Don’t think I will bother investing in that air pump heater just yet.

It’s literally the first line of the news article? To be honest they will probably generate a lot of scepticism if they start telling the masses that common localised weather phenomenon (only in mountain ranges, where are the mountain ranges around Rome and Cote de azure?) I am still awaiting the mini ice age that the climate experts promised back in the 80s, just saying.