Ultimately, this land disagreement is the last stand of the ‘kibble bad’ brigade.
The arrangement is proving a successful one, on and off the park. The initial teething problems have all but evaporated. It was unrealistic for people to think there should be absolutely none IMO anyway, but that’s now in the past.
Even the financial hangover from Covid is likely to have went far faster than expected based on good crowds, cup runs, player sales & on park success.
Talking about extraction plans is your choice, but it was never a short term ownership model. The Kibble would have been looking to protect themselves & their investment as well, so clauses that take away that protection were never going to be likely.
I’d say, worrying about how we get out from a winning ownership model, doesn’t make a lot of sense.