slapsalmon

Got you, I knew it had reduced what the eventual shareholding would be, just got mixed up with what it was going to be before the deal.

Did the new deal not mean smisa had less than the 51%?

Wasnt so hard now was it. Can't see anyone paying anywhere near 1mil when he's injured and can sign a pre contract in January, regardless of what his value is perceived as.

That's not an answer to the question he asked.

He just made an arse of quoting me. That was a post I wrote to someone else that he's copied rather than quoted

Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery

The NHS isn't doing this I've quoted most of the conversation, highlighted the link to the gov website which details the stopping of treatment, I've also highlighted several times you agreed that treatments have stolped while saying he is wrong. No one has said emergency treatments have stopped, but it cannot be argued that there has been no disruption to the NHS and people needing routine operations or non life threatening treatment. Gp appointments where possible are also carried out over the phone. My GP won't allow anyone in unless it cannot be done on the phone (and the stock answer is to write a prescription without knowing if its needed) , and my partners work which is a GP surgery is the same. You can say your not wrong as long as you want, but as highlighted above you have actually agreed with the point several times while ever so slightly moving the goalposts to say your not wrong. Anyway I've had enough, your like bazil mk2

The relevant point is in the link I posted earlier in the thread that there was massive disruption, all non life threatening surgeries were stopped and for a period of time which is easing now the majority of general Dr appt were done over the phone. The original point stands, the majority of people needing medical treatment didn't receive it for a period of months.

He never said it was all cases. Your just twisting it to suit your nonsense. You agreed with him while quoting him to disagree 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

It's factual according to your response to him as well as the link from the Scottish government website I posted earlier. Are you on the same planet as the rest of us?

In another post he also said the below, which is also a fact. The NHS have reduced services for those that need them to create capacity for those that don't, under Government instruction.

I've copied the important part of his quote below. What he said in that quote is a fact. By your very admission, some treatments were postponed. So it makes it true that people who needed medical treatment were denied. the majority of non Covid related medical interventions haven't been taking place, and while these are gradually coming back, they are still well below what would usually happen, with a massive backlog now in place.

It's not a narrative, all routine surgeries were stopped. Some have started back at a very reduced capacity and others are still on hold. GPS have not allowed patients inside the buildings since around the same time. Eta heres a link from the 17th of March detailing the stopping of surgery. https://www.gov.scot/news/nhs-scotland-placed-on-emergency-footing/

I agree to an extent, but I think the rule says risk of injury so wether or not it was intentional or he could've done anything I can't see it being overturned. Also imagine that's against us and there's a crowd. They'd be screaming for a red.

As I said before I think it's unfortunate that Ross Stewart leg had hit the ground and it wasn't intentional. Fraction of a second earlier and he'd have ridden the tackle.

Accidental doesn't mean it's not a red card if the criteria is dangerous or risk of injury. I agree there's nothing he could have done to get out of it, I 4eckon if the leg doesn't go down he just falls over, but I doubt an appeal will be successful.

Right for a start if Stewart was nowhere near it we wouldn't be having the conversation because he would be nowhere near getting hit. I'm pretty sure the rule is dangerous wether or not it's intentional. And IMO studs to the shin at speed while the leg is planted is dangerous as I said above. I also think it's unfortunate and would bet most of the folk saying not a card would be screaming for it if it's the other way.

Wasnt even close to borderline. Wasnt even a foul. Studs to the shin while the leg is planted, not intentional, but that is without doubt borderline.

Aye, I probably agree. What's the criteria for a red, risk of injury/dangerous? If its those then it's probably a red. If Stewarts leg doesn't plant he rides the tackle and it's a good old fashioned 50/50 and everybody is happy. Just unfortunate his leg went down. I'd be shouting for a red if it was against us.

Played 4, won 2, drawn 1(with 10 men), lost 1(to one of the old/new firm) Are you for real, 😂

I think that's unfortunate because Stewart leg plants. Don't think there's any way to get out of that. The contact is a fraction of a second after he plays the ball and there's no movement to hit the leg

In any premises serving food there must either be an automatic machine which reaches above 82* for 30 seconds or 2 stage cleaning with one of the stages being bactericidal detergent, the stuff has a corrosive label on it and any prolonged contact with skin causes problems so I'd be confident any bacteria would be gone. Any debris in machine washed crockery is more likely due to a machine not being cleaned out sufficiently often rather than improperly loaded. Modern machines have jets above and below which rotate at a good speed.

For a start you have no idea what footing I'm on. Not once have I put an opinion on here either way, secondly I am demanding nothing. I am pointing out you paint opinion as fact which you have stated you do as its probable. I have zero interest in debating with a toddler who will not listen

Don't start telling me why his view is wrong, I couldn't give a f**k either way or who is right or wrong. I'm also not getting into any debate with you. As I said, people aren't saying anything because of your view, it's because you paint it as fact. When that is pointed out you do what you've done above or start using mixed up capitals and lower case letters, that is the childish part. Believing you are absolutely 100% correct and everybody else is wrong is the smug part, and it doesn't matter the subject. I skipped your post as soon as you started telling me why he was wrong, but on the final part about holding your hands up when your wrong, that's the issue. Right now nobody knows who is right or wrong. Including the people leading the research, yet you shout fact at everything you post. You call things fact when they are not a fact, maybe probable but not a fact. You turn every debate into right or wrong so there is actually no debate on the merits of any side of the argument, no middle ground, no conceding that someone may have a point regarding anything. You have zero interest in hearing Anyone's opinion if it doesn't match your own, and you bludgeon them with zero evidence of anything all the time shouting fact. There is no debate. It turns into playground shite every single time because of this. There are probably half decent points in there somewhere but nobody reads them because they stop at the first misplaced call of fact. If you were open to actually having a debate with people, listening to other points of view, and posting your opinion not painted as a fact they would possibly have a debate, but not the way you act just now. I believe we have had this very conversation before regarding the way you "debate" so I'm probably wasting my time here.

But that's the issue most people have. You post something incorrect and say it is a fact when it isn't. If you just posted IMO nobody would bat an eyelid. Coming across smug and always correct appears childish and incapable of seeing any merit in someone else's view. Regardless wether or not the geezer Andy is right or wrong he posts articles and reasons for his view. You just post and say your opinion is a fact. It's not debating, it's an absolute battle of attrition designed to wear people down. People don't have a vendetta against you like you believe. Most people just can't be arsed until every now and again they get annoyed by your use of the word fact and it needs called out. Believe it or not you aren't always correct. Ffs the people leading the information gathering on this whole covid pish wouldn't even be calling half the stuff facts as they don't know. They do however say they "believe" or "in their opinion"