Slarti

That's what you get for being a horny wee bastard. [emoji16]

Fisting Boris?

Conservative.

[emoji33]

Nope, still taking copious amounts of cocaine.

Aberdeen.

Yep. But why is it significant that they got those 3 points in the lead up to the split? I'll answer that for you - it isn't. In your opinion. More subjectivity - I'm out of this too.

As I've already mentioned (maybe on another thread, can't remember), they're not directly comparable, there are many other factors at play other than the manager. You're the one who put the significance on playing them in the run up to the split as if that was the defining factor in why they made the top 6.

So if our last 5 games before the split had been Celtic, Sevco, Hearts, St Johnstone and Dundee then they wouldn't be in the top six because they beat us? The fact is that if any of their wins over the first 33 games had actually been a loss (that sounds silly, but you know what I mean) then they wouldn't have made the top six. In fact, a draw rather than a win could have seen them miss out.

I had a Saints/Coventry double on that day - won feck all cos the bet was over 90 minutes and both games went to ET.

So, which of the bottom 6 lost there places in the top 6 because we lost to these other teams?

I have actually looked at it because my work was/is looking at it and it seems to be that a Wednesday off seems to be the most productive setup. I think that was based on "office based" work, mind you, don't know about manufacturing or engineering. I worked a 4 on 4 off for a while, which was shite, but again, not really directly comparable. So, really, naw, no experience of it. [emoji16]

I've experienced a zero day working week in the past, it was no good for anybody, so don't go to that extreme. That's probably not helpful.

Would that be the same ones that are "only there" because they beat Aberdeen?

Aye, right ye are, ya dementit auld c**t.

Is that who Dicko has his tea parties with?

It's ok, we all know it is. (And, yes, I am speaking for everyone). [emoji16]

At least that's a backhanded acknowledgement that they are not the same entity. [emoji16]

Yeah, you know "my opinion" on them already.

But it's not.

It's not philosophical at all, it's just the truth.

No, that's not what I said at all. You can objectively compare two sets of raw data without that having any bearing on things not included, that is, the result has no bearing on anything else. Also, things can be objectively subjective or subjectively objective (in fact, most things are, in reality, one or the other) as well as being purely objective or subjective. Anyway, as I said in the previous post, I'm out.

So because they are not directly comparable you would shut them down? That's a bit of a weird way to look at things. It's an entertainment business, FFS. That's why it's so good. No matter how you get your jollies (watching the best free flowing football, getting one over your rivals, having something to moan about, etc.), there's something for everyone. Anyway, I was only pointing out one thing and, as I said, I try not to get involved in subjective matters, so I'm out.

Everyone has the right to an opinion, but not all opinions are equal, not all are worthy of respect and some are not even worthy of consideration.