He was, according to sources, loving this situation and thought he had an opportunity to throw mud at the current board.
Lastly, you've already proved this week reading isn't your strong point when you, unsurprisingly, totally missed the ruling that the judge stated clearly there WAS defamation so now it seems you can't spot a typo.
To clarify, this recent case is yet another EGO trip for Wardrop, along with his childish attempts to set up a rival "club" to the 1877 club, and him trying to use the smokescreen that these statements against board members were IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST when it's all about him in trying to gain some of his long lost power. He was also warned despite hiding behind two sections of law that if he were to repeat these statements he would be in deep doo doo.
You will, thankfully, be in a very small minority in thinking Gillespie & Macmillan shouldn't have raised this and to suggest they should have stepped down is exactly what they shouldn't have done.
Anyhow, it's all today's fish supper wrapping, the club and the board, continue to go from strength to strength despite the never ending negativity from some rather sad souls.
PS if there's any other typos you spot please forgive me as I'm still recovering from recent eye surgery.