civilsaint

Just noticed, the thread title is very apt.

I guess that board meeting is still sitting. They must be enjoying their Budvar........

That's a different set of accounts, that's the parent company''s accounts. Of course, these are the accounts that would show how Whyte funded the takeover, and that is the Billion(aire) dollar question.

Do you mean how long will it be unitil it dissolves? Surely instructions are on the packet?

Alistair Johnstone, wow, just WOW!!

Poz, "liquidation" is (one of) the elephant(s) in the room. But, no matter what happens our club have to be strong. Without going into the complexities of the situtaion, as a voting member they have a duty to ensure the SPL make the right decision, not the easiest decision. If our club were to vote for a situation that let r*ngers (in some form) back into the SPL relatively scot-free "because we need the TV money" or whatever else, they will lose credibility and they will lose fans. If our club did not take a morally correct decision I'd be done with Scottish football forever.

Something is afoot...... Also, lots of talk on rangerstaxcase.com recently suggesting that the only legitimate way for any "newco" r*ngers to re-enter the SPL (post liquidation) would be for CW to buy the mighty Saint Mirren and relocate. Of course, this is technically and factually correct. Luckily we've got good people at the helm, which is more than can be said about the team from Govan. Looks like they will need to rely on rules being bent to re-enter the SPL, but hopefully that won't be allowed to happen either.

Mirin = Male Mirren = Female, or am I mistaken?

Daily Record in inaccurate shocker Scottish punter takes notice of Daily Record story and posts on football forum shocker

^^ Exactly the kind of wild speculation (dressed up as fact) that I was talking about earlier.

Yes, or maybe some MP's/councillor's have been giving the club stick for having full inboxes. Such a short, abrput statement just leaves everyone guessing, and opens the door for wild speculation. Like I said, strange.

Strange. It is a pretty amateurish statment for the chairman of the club to be making. Such a statement raises more questions than it answers. I find it absurd that any clarification was needed, so what is the reasoning behind the statement? At no time has there ever been the suggestion that writing to elected members was being done on behalf of the board, there has been no communication linking the board to such a tactic. It looks like the games have started between the different parties.

Huh? Do you always play the class idiot?

I was replying to your post with regard to your suggestion of printing your comments and giving them to RA, I though that would have been obvious. If I want to discuss anthing with 10000hrs it is not done anonymously, so no in that regard my input would not be pointless.

That would be pointless. Your input isn't particularly valuable or credible when it comes from behind a pseudonym, with absolutely no attempt to engage at a personal level, despite various invitations.

Yes.

Is Somner really trying to claim that he has no interest in the 10000hrs takeover despite 63% of his posts being in this section? Strange.

Very interesting, albeit irrelevant. What I have pointed out has nothing to do with grammar or punctuation. Your interpretation of what 10000hrs has said is completely and fundamentally flawed. You are attributing fabricated actions to 10000hrs that are totally and completely wide of the mark, and with no substance. I'll say it again, 10000hrs "assumed" or "insisted" nothing of the sort that you are suggesting. These are your words, your completely wrong interpretation. You may view the factual chain of events as a moot point, others don't. You are disingenuous at best.

Oops. It looks like you either don't have an adequate grasp of the English language or you are intentionally manipulating the situation. I'm not sure which scenario is worse. 10000hrs hasn't "assumed" or "insisted" anything of the sort, but I'm pretty confident you already know that.

No and no.

There is a significant cost involved in the inital installation. The board would have to sanction such an investment. RA doesn't have control of the club, so not his decision.

Bluto's favourite site has been updated yet again. *Here*. Interesting to say the least.

They've now withdrawn co-operation with the BBC.

I note that you still haven't replied to my comments two weeks ago in the "It's time" thread. The silence is deafening. You have no interest in debate or discussion, your purpose is clearly to attempt to dod amage the scheme and those involved. It appears you have about as much integrity as Johann Hari.

I see you failed to respond to the rest of my post. Sometimes, what you fail to say is more telling than what you say.