Iamhammer

Why do I think that? Well after working in various company’s for over 40 years I’ve never seen it happen before. Add in the fact that any employee will be and should be loyal to the person who pays their wages. Is the person capable? Was there an interview process with other candidates? If there is a conflict who’s instructions Is the GM going to follow? Can St Mirren terminate their position at the club?

Am I the only one who thinks that no company should ever have a general manager who is not their employee?

Like I said mind playing tricks, only this time it’s mine

Really good watch, it’s amazing how the mind plays tricks, two of the guys interviewed loved Platini’s performance at Love Street, when he never actually played. In fact he didn’t play in the second leg either.

Not really, Ross County play Us Hearts and Hamilton pre split. Then we play Hearts so points getting dropped all over the place. Also as we will have played more away games than home pre split we will have Three homes games after it, this means that as it stands St Johnstone, Hamilton or Hearts will have to visit us. Still in the driving seat as I see it

Think Div is referring to someone posting shulls full name on another thread

We have less this season than last season, those guy's showed plenty fight.

We have two home games in a week win both and we will be above County and within a point of St Johnstone, why the gloom?

So are you trying to say that W6er is your name?

Interesting if again lengthy post. So would you vigorously defend the chairman in a bar if people were calling him a liar over the spitting at the stretcher incident that never happened and that he never apologised to the fans for?

That price is more than fair. Especially after they played a further 90 mins and got a player suspended, that is if Long's 2 yellows result in a ban for this match. And even if he does play they've been pretty poor for months and conceded 5 in 180 mins to us from open play. That in itself is barely believable! And yes we've conceded 5 to them as well but we're never a 3/1 shot. I'd have thought 2's max. Oh well, let's see...... 4/1 with paddy power yesterday into 11/4 this morning my 20 quid must have done some damage to the odds 😂

Haemorrhoids ?

Regarding employees, they expressly said that it would be in addition to not instead of. Doesn't work that way I'm afraid, I worked in the training industry for 11 years including an enjoyable spell with the Kibble. I can assure most of the companies are a charity but have to make a profit. It also costs jobs. There is no other feasible way to save the placement company money.

And a loss of jobs for the people working there at present ?

More than just us unfortunately

Then I suggest you clean your ears.

It already is, being a member of the SFA

No, its just a matter of principle to me.

As far as I'm concerned yes, if I entered into an agreement to buy 71 % of say land, and then the seller decides that I can only have 51 % and that a new 3rd party will have a veto on what I want to do with the land, I would remove myself from the deal and look for my money back. Add this to the fact that, the kibble get the shares and GLS gets 300k (which they are both entitled to if the deal goes ahead), then why are SMISA paying the legal fees? This not only puzzles me but gives concerns for the future as to what else we will pay for.

What about your GLS one?

I take it you never got a answer from them when you asked? I'm still waiting on an answer to why SMISA are paying the legal fees

The first though for me with regards to voting was the original plan I was sold on 71% of the club owned by SMISA, was I willing to accept 51% and the veto. Since then other questions have arisen which does lead to doubt that this is the correct way to take the purchase forward. Also in this thread Bazil85 pointed out to me that GLS was a successful business man (think he used the word very) who would have made more money on his investment had he not got involved in BTB, thus allowing him to write off his worthless shares had the consortium sold to a third party. This begs the question if he is so successful why does he need the Kibble to take the club forward?

I would simply charge away fans what they charge our fans, starting with hearts who charge us £7 more than we charge their fans

That's the point re the season ticket comment, what would boycotting a game you have paid for with a season ticket do?

Think they number more than 20 to be honest, as for the 27 quid is that game not on a season ticket?