smcc

True.

Perhaps you can show me where I have said this. I have simply pointed out to those who seem to think otherwise that this in not a done deal, but is dependent on a vote of the members after questions have been raised and answered at the meeting, and that the Chairman was the only person who stepped up with cash to kick start the bid. AFIK these are facts. where is the deference?

If BTB goes through as originally envisaged the fans will eventually have put up all the money, but you still have not told me who was prepared to kick start the bid by putting up several hundred thousand pounds. The previous board was desperate to sell up and might well have sold out to some outsider/asset stripper without the intervention of Gordon Scott.

As for benefiting the Chairman's bank balance, you conveniently forget that he was the only one prepared to but up the cash to allow BTB to go ahead. Under the proposed deal he will certainly get his money earlier than he thought, but you have no idea what his present financial circumstances are and whether he might need this. You needs to get rid of the huge chip on your shoulder.

Stupid post. Would a Scot have referred to Britain as England?

It does not matter why , or whether they were asked. It will only come to pass if a majority of SMISA members OKs it. If you are a member you will have a vote, if you are not It shouldn't concern you.

LPM. SMISA members are being asked whether or not they approve of this! No deal has been done; it is still only a proposal. if you are a SMISA member you will get your say.

Further extract from the terms of the proposed deal:- - if SMISA or Kibble wish to sell any or all their shares in SMFC, the other will have first refusal (Posted 2 hours ago0.

Again1

Further extract from the terms of the proposed deal:- - if SMISA or Kibble wish to sell any or all their shares in SMFC, the other will have first refusal

Sorry, but it obvious that some of the posters either can't read or are unable to understand what they are reading.

See my previous post! 😊

Majority fan-owned phase Once SMISA owns the majority stake in SMFC, the following will apply: - The matters defined above as requiring mutual shareholder approval will continue to do so (applying to SMISA and Kibble only); - The SMFC board will be responsible for the operation of the club. Football decisions will be made by the club’s football department; - SMISA will be able to appoint the majority of the SMFC board. Appointments will be made on the basis of the skills and expertise required by the club. New appointments will be selected by the SMISA committee after an interview process and put to the members for approval;

I give you one guess1

In which case, why are we leaving?

There is also the fact that head to head contact is more damaging than heading the ball!

Does he really think that ringing the bell in "celebration" of Brexit will unite the country, which he said he is determined to do?

According to the website tickets are for sale there.

Since ST's aren't valid I'd guess 4000 would be a real achievement. According to the ticketing website(and if my arithmetic is correct) there are around 3700 tickets still for sale which means that more than 4000 have been sold.

Hacked by Baz? No, but I can see why he is annoyed with you. You are totally unable to see another point of view and, as he says, you are totally unable to give up. I am finished; you can ramble on forever as long as I am concerned. It may well be that you will claim that you have beaten me(as you do with Baz) but I will treat that with the contempt it deserves.

Show me where I criticised you. You must have a very thin skin. I personally do not see it as manipulation but you don't seem to be able to let anyone have an opinion that is different to yours!

I have no idea whether it has happened before. Tell me why it matters?

It does not really matter if or when there was a SMISA pot vote with only one option. The fact is that this vote gives you the chance to vote for or against -a choice.

There are two options; vote for or against. Have you forgotten the two referendums?

"The total cost for this request is £2600. Should the project not receive majority backing the sums will remain in the pot for possible use at a future date." This is a quote from the SMISA email. It seems to me that I have a choice. If I believe the suggested spend is reasonable I can vote "yes"; if I think differently I can vote "No" and the money will not be spent.