Jump to content

TPAFKA Jersey 2

Saints
  • Posts

    6,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by TPAFKA Jersey 2

  1. So you provoke him into a response by calling him a tool and then mock him for responding. Good work. How old are you exactly?
  2. Lost me there Shull. My post is perfectly punctuated. As usual.
  3. I have zero issue with Celtic and Rangers being bigger than everyone else in terms of support (as they have always been) or financial clout (which has obviously become much greater over the last 30 years or so - in Celtic's case anyway). What I have a problem with is that because they are bigger, everyone else feels the need to suck their metaphoric cocks and be happy for them to scoop up all the revenue, as well as having the voting rights completely sown up too. It still astonishes me that in Rangers absence, the other clubs didn't force a change of the voting structure. I think the other 38 clubs need to step up and at least create the notion of a rebellion. It's arguable that without Celtic and Rangers in the league, the likely biggest hit on clubs revenue would be a loss or at least significant reduction in TV revenue. However, under the current arrangements, the Old Firm hoover up most of that anyway. In the sense that they can't play each other every week, they need us as much as we need them, so for me a rebellion has to be at least threatened. Equal distribution of TV revenue, every club televised the same number of times, change the voting rules so the OF can't carve everything up for themselves. If that was to transpire I'd be happy. Even if the OF went on to still win pretty much everything by virtue of being the biggest clubs then so be it. That's life. Every country has its big clubs who win most things. Of course, this will never happen.
  4. I think someone is needing to coach you on giving positive spins full stop. This article doesn't need "spun". It is perfectly obvious to anyone who doesn't have a negative agenda what Stephen was trying to say. Sorry, not trying, he managed to say it just fine.
  5. What!!!!!! They’ve started abusing the Colonel as well now!! These bastards will stop at nothing!
  6. You’re going to need to point out to me where I said there was much difference between us and Dundee?? All I’ve done is mock your ridiculous notion that Dundee are suddenly going to start winning loads of games.
  7. That’s as maybe, but I’ll bet he knows the difference between aliases and alias’. Thats horrific.
  8. Meltdown. That’s right up there with offended. You do realise there is a difference between someone biting and someone mocking you yes?
  9. Offended?? Utterly hilarious. Which part of my mockery of your nonsense suggests I’m offended? Ok let’s try this a deferent way. Why are you worried that a team who have just lost 7 games on the bounce, who in their most recent performances have looked like a team devoid of hope, are suddenly going to string a load of wins together? Instead of expressing worry about a (let’s face it) extremely unlikely scenario, why not speculate that maybe we are more likely than Dundee to go on such a run? I’ll tell you why, because that would involve you contributing positive thought to the forum whilst in turn denying you the opportunity to spout spurious negative pish instead.
  10. You really do talk some amount of jibberish. So you are worried that Dundee (who by virtue of their current league position have been even more utterly shite than us) are going to go on a winning spree, but we’re not capable of doing the same. You really are a dummy.
  11. Is that how easy it is? Just re-boot, forget you've been utterly shite for the whole season and suddenly become brilliant? Goddamnit!! Why didn't we think of that? Oh...wait a minute....can we not just do that as well?
  12. I think if Villa go up and we want to make any more money on McGinn, then he’ll need to get sold in the summer, because I think he’ll get found out in the Premiership.
  13. I’m getting a bit old for caring what a strip looks like, but I have to say that is a stoater.
  14. I like your thinking here but I only have two personal reservations. Being old school I kinda like the idea of the singng section being next to the away fans. I think it helps the atmosphere and I never did like the idea of having away fans in the west stand. Also whilst hearing swearie words never ruined my life when I was growing up, I think modern day parents have a different view on this and may object. Ironically my middle daughter (now 24) at the age of about 7, heard her first “c**t” in the family stand at Love Street!
  15. Presumably under this option though we'd need to ditch the concept of a family stand? Whilst the W7 lads don't sing songs of hate, filled with sectarianism and bigotry, they do have a few wee ditties that probably wouldn't meet the family stand criteria.
  16. And the award for “suggested new definition of irony in the OED” goes to......
  17. This thread is already about 8 pages longer than it needed to be. Anyone arguing that it is not commercially beneficial to the club to do this is a moron. The only thing up for debate is whether the (relatively speaking) derisory sum of money earned, is worth it. This thread could basically have just been a poll. For the record, I'd be clicking the radio button that said "Tell the minkin' tinks to ram their cash and they're lucky we allow them to pollute one stand of our lovely wee stadium". If indeed that is one of the options of said poll.
  18. IF we end up in a play off, a lot of people seem to be taking it for granted that we’ll play Utd. II certainly would not be writing off Inverness CT. They are bang on form and have already taken care of Utd in the cup.
  19. In fairness, you weren’t a Kearney fan before he accepted defeat ahead of Wednesday night’s game. In fact you’re not a fan of many things St. Mirren related.
×
×
  • Create New...