This whole issue is a conundrum to me. I don't think of myself as stupid or uneducated but my mind remains a fog in this debate.
I still haven't made up my mind about which way to vote in the referendum issue.
Genuinely, I do admire Salmond because he doesn't take any sh!t from the (so called) mainstream partyleaders. Unlike Joanne Lamont and Ms Davidson (I confess I can't remenber her first name) he doesn't have a boss at westminster to kow-tow to and check with that we are towing the party line with before having a fart.
On the other hand, I still feel that a Union is probably beneficial to all and eliminates the obvious risks involved in a small country going it alone. Maybe I'm hedging towards safe as opposed to speculative.
I need some guidance from those who are better-informed. Answers please from those with no political bias to influence their answer to my fundamental questions.
Why is it that the 3 mainstream parties favour the Union and oppose an independent Scotland. All the propaganda from "daan souff" tells us that Scotland and the Scots are leeching off the good people of Engurland so why would they want us to remain a burden to them ?
In particular, why would David Cameron and his Conservative Party be opposed to hiving off a region that (as a generalisation) hates the Tories and offers the Labour Party a handicap advantage of maybe 30, 40, or 50 seats at a UK General election ? If we are a burden why wouldn't he be delighted to detach us from the rest of the UK and make future General elections a dawdle for the blue brigade ?
If someone would care to clarify this one for me maybe I will be in a better position to decide which way to vote next year.
Thanks in advance.