ktf

Thats a tad unfair imo! Sid has played it with a straight bat right down the line. He's been two-faced, condescending, rude and wind-up with absolutely everyone seeking neither favour nor position of influence within club (cough, cough,)

Well Said Roderick, Some of these Clowns like KTF & Sid, Think that REA ( Tthe Saviour of the Haulage & Construction Industry ) Could / Should / Whas / is The Saviour of SMFC ? where would tricky Dick'y be withoot His Daddy ? Now if it was Young, Andrew Malcolm of WHM - Then I would be impressed , Sadlly It is Not - It's some " Neebur " Who couldnae spell SMFC - Trying to get controll of My Club, By Hook or by Crook ?

Not that I can answer on behalf of the mods but Feegie Saint used homophobic and arguably racist comments on a lot of his previous posts. I think that was why he was banned.
And FWIW, there are those that are wanks on here! Some, and you know who, have (for whatever reason) launched a smear campaign against REA and the CiC generally. Those who tried to stick up for the man or the CiC notion, probably because they had taken the time to meet with him and discuss their concerns, we're accused of wanting a place on some sort of board.
With the exception of Somner9 every counter-CiC arguement has been along the lines of " he doesn't even run a company", "he's a dick", "you are an arselicker" or "there are no scarves".
The case levelled against those who are on the side of the CiC is that we just call those against names... However that is what that anti lot do too! The only difference is, we have bothered to look into it, go to them with our concerns and hear what they have to say.

Not that I can answer on behalf of the mods but Feegie Saint used homophobic and arguably racist comments on a lot of his previous posts. I think that was why he was banned.
And FWIW, there are those that are wanks on here! Some, and you know who, have (for whatever reason) launched a smear campaign against REA and the CiC generally. Those who tried to stick up for the man or the CiC notion, probably because they had taken the time to meet with him and discuss their concerns, we're accused of wanting a place on some sort of board.
With the exception of Somner9 every counter-CiC arguement has been along the lines of " he doesn't even run a company", "he's a dick", "you are an arselicker" or "there are no scarves".
The case levelled against those who are on the side of the CiC is that we just call those against names... However that is what that anti lot do too! The only difference is, we have bothered to look into it, go to them with our concerns and hear what they have to say.

Touche...!

Not that I can answer on behalf of the mods but Feegie Saint used homophobic and arguably racist comments on a lot of his previous posts. I think that was why he was banned.
And FWIW, there are those that are wanks on here! Some, and you know who, have (for whatever reason) launched a smear campaign against REA and the CiC generally. Those who tried to stick up for the man or the CiC notion, probably because they had taken the time to meet with him and discuss their concerns, we're accused of wanting a place on some sort of board.
With the exception of Somner9 every counter-CiC arguement has been along the lines of " he doesn't even run a company", "he's a dick", "you are an arselicker" or "there are no scarves".
The case levelled against those who are on the side of the CiC is that we just call those against names... However that is what that anti lot do too! The only difference is, we have bothered to look into it, go to them with our concerns and hear what they have to say.

Touché!

Touche!

Bluto's just trying to jump on the anti-CiC bandwagon, cos he thinks it's cool.

As revealed a few weeks ago, the issue was with a change of personnel at the top level in the key funding organisation. The sellik supporting chap didnae fancy a strong St Mirren and veto'd the plan. I would liked to have seen REA let the fans have a go at the chap; however he is too nice a chap for that - not a bad thing. The redirection in terms of funding has been on the go for a while as we knew about the change in one funder back in June this year.
The CIC plans are alive and well.

Is someone spent £2M of thier own money from their bank account, or even pooled money from various bank accounts, to buy St Mirren they they'd be completely mad and should be nowhere near our club.
£2M borrowed is £2M, £2M of someone's own cash would quickly become £4M or £5M with tax and various fee's on top. You show a distinct lack of business understanding (had been doing well up until now) if you don't take this into consideration.
The only sensible option would be for someone to borrow and pay back. It'd cost them less in the long run.

Bluto's just trying to jump on the anti-CiC bandwagon, cos he thinks it's cool.

Bluto's just trying to jump on the anti-CiC bandwagon, cos he thinks it's cool.

The above statement sums this website up quite frankly.

Fair play to you, you must be "well in there" with "the powers that be". Either that or your Bum will be sore for a few days. I just want to remind you of a post "I made earlier"...

Not having a clue myself what the current state of play is with the CIC, I think the most interesting aspect of this post is the use of an exclamation mark. Maybees aye, maybees naw? Good news? Maybees aye, maybees naw. Now, as an example. My dad (God rest his soul) initially suffered a stroke and was admitted to the RAH. My younger brother lives down South, and needed to know what was going on. I reckon if I had sent the following two text messages, my brother would have made the conclusion in brackets after each...
1. Just been to see dad in hospital - will call you when I get home.
(Conclusion: Dad's pan breid', prepare for a bad phone call)
2. Just been to see dad in hospital - will call you when I get home!
(Conclusion: Dad's going to make it! He used an exclamation mark!)
Now the ball is in Div's court. He can either choose to refute my exclamation mark theory, affirm my exclamation mark theory, or perhaps think that my exclamation mark theory is the result of my fourth bottle of Corona while the wife forces me to watch Children in Need...ahem.
!

Sometime it's utter pish and other times it's on the money... I'll leave it to the other posters' imaginations as to what this post is
FWIW, GD to you buddie.

Is someone spent £2M of thier own money from their bank account, or even pooled money from various bank accounts, to buy St Mirren they they'd be completely mad and should be nowhere near our club.
£2M borrowed is £2M, £2M of someone's own cash would quickly become £4M or £5M with tax and various fee's on top. You show a distinct lack of business understanding (had been doing well up until now) if you don't take this into consideration.
The only sensible option would be for someone to borrow and pay back. It'd cost them less in the long run.

Sometime it's utter pish and other times it's on the money... I'll leave it to the other posters' imaginations as to what this post is
FWIW, GD to you buddie.

..
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha..........what really????? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ........ speak to REA? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... oh good yin!

What plan are we on to now? Are there enough letters in the alphabet?

Dibble is falling into the same trap as stoppit posters like somner9. Speculating were no speculating is required. All of the funding is in place and as Dibble clumsily points out above additional funding has been offered. All funding areas are now oversubscribed from the social ent orgs, the fans, the community members and the commercial members. Progress is being made on the outstanding issue, which is not financial. The details are not being made available to stop well meaning bunny boilers like TL holding rallies outside of peoples doors, which as much as I'd like to see it happen would prove counter productive. If the details of the issue were to be released those slating Richie Rich would feel very silly indeed.

'yul's back'
ffs mate, dont get carried away with yourself.
The cic? who am i to offer an opinion on it, im just one of the guys that pledged £120 per annum to the scheme. Complete news blackout and no communication coming out of 10000 hours suggests to me im not really important in all this, perhaps its close to completion, who knows? Does anyone really care except for the sellers?
its a shame that representatives of 10000 hours were all over this forum at the begining yet are no where to be seen now.
If i were in charge of a scheme requiring 100s of fans to part with money each month i would at the very least have kept in contact with those who have pledged. Ignore the fuds on here if you want but dont ignore me. even a newsletter emailed each month would be good. Maybe i expect too much?
Last we heard, through div, was that RA couldnt explain anything that day because he was busy dealing with an IT outage at MAXI. how long ago was that?

Out of all of the coalition politicians, Theresa May is the one I cany stand the most Zero redeeming features...

Brilliant stuff Div!
Back on track... I reposted on Twitter with a fair degree of certainty, do you know even more now?