^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Can ye no read??
"If I knew what "rhetorical" meant I could answer that question couldn't I?"
As you may have noticed I didn't put a question mark at the end of the sentence therefore didn't mean it as a question.
More a statement that looked like a question?
It actually shows how little clout the newco has. Once upon a time NO home game at Ibrokes was shown live. That, of course, was when Rangers played there.
Is that our new marquee signings Dan Potts, Brian Kettle and Ian Black?
Now Kettle might be long in the tooth and young Dan plays at a pretty low level but, come on, IAN Feckin' Black? He hasn't played for a decent team in years!
If it is as stated that the sole reason for Houston not paying a fee is due to the MLS basically not wanting to then surely Saints should have recourse through FIFA as the compensation is a FIFA rule and the US are members of FIFA?
My thinking too. div.
Poz's example is the opposite from Saints' situation. Saints are benefitting financially from the deal no matter how disgruntled we as a support are. Look at last years fiasco. More stock left than sold no doubt but it made no difference to the buddies' coffers. More reason for a JD pull out than a Saints' one. The only reason for the BoD's pulling the plug would be to appease the supporters and when was the last time they worried about us?