FS Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Cheers ZA for your legal input. I'm sure thats where others were coming from too One point you make is interesting - what's the relevance of when the offence took place? I'd suppose it might be down to the differing states of 'political correctness' between then and now and the fact the 'crime' was not reported until many years later and after a precedent had been set by Operation Yewtree. What am I trying to say here ? Oh yes, I'm pretty certain many a cleavage was grabbed by an amporous male twenty odd years ago that we'll never hear about. I'd never condone any kind of aggressive sexual conduct by anyone, but I do sometimes wonder in these celebrity cases nowadays why the complainers chose to complain now and not back then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurich_allan Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Cheers ZA for your legal input. I'm sure thats where others were coming from too One point you make is interesting - what's the relevance of when the offence took place? Ah, this is tricky to sum up in a short post - but I'll give it a go. There are types of offence that are much more likely to be isolated incidents, and types of offence that can be indicators of there being more than one victim. Say a drunken fight after a night out at the pub - not likely to become a repeat offence in a patterned or systematic way. Sexual assaults on the other hand can be indicators of a number of things, one of which is that it becomes a pattern of behaviour. So if this happened 20 years ago, with no proven episode of re-offending in the interim, it is much less likely to be a continual problem, there's also a huge amount of scope for being precise with the background reports (i.e. had he done anything else in the 19 year period between then and now). The fact that the background reports will have come back clean, along with the lack of evidence of re-offending over such a length of time would make the time period relevant. I know what I mean, just not sure if I'm putting it across properly.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 The way dlt responded on the court steps after his conviction IMO was the attitude of a pervert caught and convicted but still playing to his loyal crowd..what licks touches and gropes like a perv ..is usually something we wouldn't like near our families. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 I'd suppose it might be down to the differing states of 'political correctness' between then and now and the fact the 'crime' was not reported until many years later and after a precedent had been set by Operation Yewtree. What am I trying to say here ? Oh yes, I'm pretty certain many a cleavage was grabbed by an amporous male twenty odd years ago that we'll never hear about. I'd never condone any kind of aggressive sexual conduct by anyone, but I do sometimes wonder in these celebrity cases nowadays why the complainers chose to complain now and not back then. Also , some individuals have increased their wealth by the taking of his wealth . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 I suppose the only good things to come out of it are. he's got a criminal record (he used to play a fair few of those) He's on the sex offenders register for life It's affected his health Oh yeah and the other thing he has been found out to be a lying feckin pervert! You could say DLT has had his arse felt this time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 Also , some individuals have increased their wealth by the taking of his wealth . . Who? The woman concerned waived any right to compensation to make sure the bastard got done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 Who? The woman concerned waived any right to compensation to make sure the bastard got done. Whoopeee ! DLT is a good guy , I'm f**king delighted he walked free ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 Reads like the dj's are closing ranks with the quizmaster... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 Whoopeee ! DLT is a good guy , I'm f**king delighted he walked free ! He is free to walk he just needs to sign on at the polis station and let them know his movements, as well as keeping away from at risk groups.... Yeah he' s free to emjoy that lifestyle, after all.... He's worth it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29415240 Only four? Wonder who the other three were? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.