pozbaird Posted August 3, 2016 Report Share Posted August 3, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-3691300 Having seen the women who normally attach themselves to the marches.... Wid'. Definitely wid'. Top Loyalist totty right there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted August 3, 2016 Report Share Posted August 3, 2016 A dilemma for the God fearing homophobic ulster unionists, however I'm sure if Adrienne isn't a T im, that should probably swing it.Sent fae ma fone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 (edited) Brave woman but the 2005 story confirms what I have long suspected, that the most anti gay people are themselves somewhere on the spectrum away from pure heterosexuality. They vent their anger in a pathetic attempt to distance themselves from what their religion or culture tells them is wrong. It is utterly pathetic. There is no other reasonable explanation for the level of rage and vitriol created by something as tedious as who a person wants to find attractive or what gender they associate with. No other explanation for why anyone could get so laughably angry over something which otherwise has zero impact on their own life. Edited August 4, 2016 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 (edited) 7 hours ago, oaksoft said: Brave woman but the 2005 story confirms what I have long suspected, that the most anti gay people are themselves somewhere on the spectrum away from pure heterosexuality. They vent their anger in a pathetic attempt to distance themselves from what their religion or culture tells them is wrong. It is utterly pathetic. There is no other reasonable explanation for the level of rage and vitriol created by something as tedious as who a person wants to find attractive or what gender they associate with. No other explanation for why anyone could get so laughably angry over something which otherwise has zero impact on their own life. Hmmm. your own post is also unreasonably and laughably impassioned about the topic. should we, as you do, be reading something into THAT? Edited August 4, 2016 by antrin Typo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 she should tell them that LGBT means loyalist great british tottie-that should fool them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, antrin said: Hmmm. your own post is also unreasonably and laughably impassioned about the topic. shoulld we, as you do, be reading something into THAT? You can read into it whatever you like. I am passionate about people being allowed to live their lives unfettered by largely religious nutters who would suppress their lifestyles for absolutely no reason whatsoever. Edited August 4, 2016 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Superficially, that's an ok thing to be passionate about, however... s/he wants to be allowed to join a group of religious nutters who would suppress other people's lifestyles for absolutely no reason whatsoever. and you passionately endorse THAT "brave woman's" wish. there's a logic gap looming there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 (edited) 3 minutes ago, antrin said: Superficially, that's an ok thing to be passionate about, however... s/he wants to be allowed to join a group of religious nutters who would suppress other people's lifestyles for absolutely no reason whatsoever. and you passionately endorse THAT "brave woman's" wish. there's a logic gap looming there. Superficially? Go f**k yourself. Oh and I endorse her right to be treated like any other human being regardless of what fruitcake religion she wants to believe in. That is her right as long as she is not lobbying parliament to deny others the same freedoms she seeks for herself. Edited August 4, 2016 by oaksoft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 As I thought... Methinks thou dost protest too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Unfortunately ulster unionists and 'the ludge' are the very groups looking to deny equal rights such as gay marriage and a women's right to terminate a pregnancy. Sent fae ma fone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 No issue with the Transgender part of this story, immense issues with the Orange Order crap, should be banned and fact Scotland still allows it is appalling. Breeds Bigotry and the fact its just a bunch of Sevco retards and always has been since 1873 or 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.