Cheers, read through it twice, maybe my dodgy eye is playing up but couldn't find the "sweat the assets" line?
Anyhow, I'm quite clear where I stand in this unnecessary squabble over, relatively speaking, a paltry amount in the turnover of the club.
PPS I wasn't in favour of this club from day one mate.
Closed shop, typical clique types and it's regularly not full to capacity.
In saying that the recent price increase, as I've already pointed out in earlier posts in this thread, aren't astronomical so it seems much ado about nothing.