For me, fans are well informed enough to know that voting out VAR means a return to how things were. It wasn’t perfect but it was miles better than what we have now (imo)
However, the overarching point I was making regarding points like ‘What is needed is it has to get better’ was…
If England with all the money in the world to make the technology state of the art can’t manage it. We have no chance. It’s a pipe dream thinking we will make it better where they can’t.
As such, I think fans need to decide if they are pro or against VAR as is. Because this is almost certainly, pretty close the end state of VAR in Scotland.
The big question is what happens if the game abandons VAR? How long will it be before fans and boards of the entitled "big clubs" lose out on a trophy or fail to qualify for the big money competitions because of a couple of dodgy decisions. The TV coverage will gleefully show the slowed down, hunners of angles views and the opinion of pundits (not the sharpest nails in the box) and ex-refs. I think VAR is out of the box and can't be put away. What is needed is it has to get better. No more refs 200 miles away from the action backing up fellow refs on dubious, wrong decisions. It needs a mix of people. There must be a few experienced ex-players who could work with officials to bring some common sense to the decision making (Wayne Rooney and Alan Shearer need not apply).