Kombibuddie

Basil' Banter Bollox
It's up there with "Fibble will never catch on"
🤔😉😁

Basil' Banter Bollox
It's up there with "Fibble will never catch on"
🤔😉😁

Fair point perhaps but I would like to think that we could have shown greater leadership Opinions!

They do indeed differ.
The fine imposed  I see as enough censure.
Are there any other occasions when an official has been sacked/removed from post when found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute?
Ally Mccoist wasn't.

They do indeed differ.
The fine imposed  I see as enough censure.
Are there any other occasions when an official has been sacked/removed from post when found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute?
Ally Mccoist wasn't.

I like John the fan
John the fan the straight talking man
 

A good missive from SMISA this morning.  Measured, sensible and positive.
a rational approach to John Needham’s jokes.  And to any ongoing frIction with Kibble.
SMISA still has my full support.

 On this.

I agree, I voted against the Kibble involvement as I couldn't see how investing in the club was a necessity for them to be in a business partnership with us, similarly I don't see the benefits of a power struggle in the boardroom to them either, we need the facts out in the open to be clear about what is going on, with regard to the customer service from the club, if this is Kibble bringing professionalism to the club then I'd rather we had the gifted amateurs.

That'll do.  Well played SMISA.

That's not how I took it at all, though your picture of Baz is spot on.

There ARE issues.
SMISA are fighting our corner and prepared to lock horns.
That has to be done in private and I respect that.

Just a shame it has come to this!

Sent from my HD1913 using Tapatalk

That'll do.  Well played SMISA.

That'll do.  Well played SMISA.

Sign back up. You can for a £fiver (I believe) & i'll see you at the SMISA AGM 😁 

I was firmly in the "must fall on his sword" camp.

I have reconsidered.

He was wrong in what he said.
However...
He has apologised.
He has been punished.

We move on.

Maybe he is best placed to support St Mirren's interests?

Sent from my HD1913 using Tapatalk

We are talking about the success of the partnership.?
Not who is or who are to blame?
Are we not?
Since you mention "The Chairman" and none of the issues raised by folk on the forum (there's been a bit of a list this season) A daft tweet as chairman & historical tweet as a punter is not a partnership killer unless one of the parties wishes for it to be. We'll see.
This "alleged" legal spat is the tip of the iceberg. There's a lot more factors to define the success or failure of the partnership.

Your say so, just not cutting it just as my say so wouldn't cut it with you.
Hey ho.
Needham in 😁

Got it. Cheers. Or so i thought until  I re-read.
You've misunderstood (deliberately it appears)
To avoid doubt, "evidence?" Was asking you for the evidence to spport your claim that folk are blaming Kibble for historical issues that predated them.

Predate Kibble you said.
July & August 2021 you "evidence"
Reps from the Kibble been on the Board since March 2020.
🤔 🤔 🤔
It doesn't take a genius to work out july & august 2021 did not happen before (predate) march 2020.
Dear oh dear. "Moving goalposts" 🤣🤣
Back to the topic in hand
Needham In 😁
 

🤣🤣
Astounding spin (or basil bollocks as it was affectionately known.)

You haven't satisfied the evidence request but there's no point bickering over something we both know you're not going to present.
My reference to March 2020 is to counter your misleading suggestion of only 6 months of Kibble "partnership" with involvment in the club.
Hopefully, you'll agree, neither of us know who is to blame for this  that or whatever.
Who's to blame is not my concern as long as it gets sorted & lessons are learned to prevent a recurrence.
 

Are you suggesting the two Kibble reps on the St Mirren board since 20th March 2020 had no input in the following 16 - 17 months prior to your exhibits of evidence existing?
I have no idea how engaged in the matters you've presented as evidence they were but I'd hazard a guess at fairly to heavily (engaged). Given the expertise & professionalism they were reportedly bringing to the table, i can see why some folk are looking in their direction when looking at any faults.
Only the decision makers (BoD) will know how much "blame" sits where for things gone wrong.
But so far, your evidence is as weak as the bovril at cappielow
Got anything pre March 2020?

Are you suggesting the two Kibble reps on the St Mirren board since 20th March 2020 had no input in the following 16 - 17 months prior to your exhibits of evidence existing?
I have no idea how engaged in the matters you've presented as evidence they were but I'd hazard a guess at fairly to heavily (engaged). Given the expertise & professionalism they were reportedly bringing to the table, i can see why some folk are looking in their direction when looking at any faults.
Only the decision makers (BoD) will know how much "blame" sits where for things gone wrong.
But so far, your evidence is as weak as the bovril at cappielow
Got anything pre March 2020?

Got it. Cheers. Or so i thought until  I re-read.
You've misunderstood (deliberately it appears)
To avoid doubt, "evidence?" Was asking you for the evidence to spport your claim that folk are blaming Kibble for historical issues that predated them.

What "legacy issues predating them" are Kibble being blamed for?

What "legacy issues predating them" are Kibble being blamed for?