notabuddie

Saints
  • Content count

    175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About notabuddie

  • Rank
    Youth team regular
  • Birthday

Recent Profile Visitors

385 profile views
  1. Tell that to Alex Rae
  2. It is a poor result when it comes after the defeat by Raith on Wednesday.
  3. DL had a smaller budget than GUS. This budget was then reduced every season. I was at the meeting when we finished 8th and because of rangers gilmour was nearly in tears as he stated we were in a good position extra cash available however he was forced to budget for 11th. DL did well for St Mirren and I am in no doubt we would not have won the cup without him
  4. DL had a smaller budget than GUS. This budget was then reduced every season. I was at the meeting when we finished 8th and because of rangers gilmour was nearly in tears as he stated we were in a good position extra cash available however he was forced to budget for 11th. DL did well for St Mirren and I am in no doubt we would not have won the cup without him
  5. I would say a months notice would have been better. While I agree you won't please everyone the way they have handled this just Smacks of let's do something for as cheap as possible then we can say we did this. First there was the whole it's a big secret, plus you need to contact the club then they made the announcement "those that were actually displaced" I think everyone would agree it should be all those in the family stand and the short notice. I'm not affected but this is appears to be a raw deal any good intentions have been blown out of the water with the way its all been handled. I hope those that can attend enjoy themselves and have a great time. Also hope to see some positive posts on here saying it was worth the disruption of being moved and the day was organised very well
  6. Agree its just a pity the club missed the opportunity to include that type of facility when the ground was being built.
  7. The example I am using is only the back three rows how many season ticket holders would that really affect... And you can also use the argument that if they are true core support they would renew or opt to use the standing area. What happens if we do become successful and put a second tier on the west stand and for some strange reason the back three rows as they are now are removed so those core supporters will up sticks and leave...
  8. No they get the opportunity to renew their seat season after season but if the seat is not there then they have the option to choose another seat or not to renew
  9. I was just making the point a season ticket is for a season not for life
  10. A season ticket is a season ticket simple logic states its a season commitment. It's in the name a season ticket
  11. So what happens if we become successful and have to redevelop the west stand..
  12. Totally agree it should be all those in the stand not the select few
  13. You only have your seat for a season. Your thinking means there will be no redevelopment of the stadium. Each season you reapply for your seat it's not at seat for life if it ain't available then tough,
  14. OK then why not take the back three rows out totally and make that standing. At the moment both home and away support benefit
  15. Why not SMISA money went on the disabled platform which no disrespect only a select few will use so why not a standing area in the west stand.. Surely the supporters /members money could be spent on the general support?