Slarti

I think you’re missing my point Slarti me old chum. I don’t disagree with you in the slightest.
My point is that f**k all will change, Rangers still have all their honours and they are still regarded by everyone in the “football world” as Rangers. No amount of bleating like big spoilt weans is going to change any of that, so let’s just shut the f**k up and get on with it. Hopefully next time they will f**k themselves beyond all repair. 

That is incorrect. Didn't you learn your lesson when you were arrested for watching a game naked in your front garden. [emoji14]

Well they didn't take many prisoners [emoji856]

Of course we disagreed.
I'm sensible! [emoji12]

Don't talk pish, it's in Cork.

At the Hearts - Morton game. Who'll be singing, If you hate the F'in St Mirren, the loudest. [emoji23]

I wouldn't think that he's overly worried about his soul, being an atheist.

I've got two border collies. One of them is obsessed with anything that creates a line above it - washing lines, telephone wires, electricity cables and, believe it or not, planes that leave vapour trails. He tries to jump up and grab the "line" and has been known to chase vapour trails for over 1/4 of a mile.

He also hates wee dugs, you'd get on well. [emoji38]

I think you'll find that the entity attached to the fingertips that operate your phone is probably a curser.

That "More than zero people were saved due to lockdown in the UK, that is fact." may be debateable.  And may be a likely outcome.
However your first post above - that I point out is merely opinion - had nothing to with that. Why drag it in unless to muddy your waters?
Your petty obfuscation does you no favours.

And the alt text for the other cartoon:
I mean, what's more likely -- that I have uncovered fundamental flaws in this field that no one in it has ever thought about, or that I need to read a little more? Hint: it's the one that involves less work.
 
btw even a lazy person could have just googled n their hones to satisfy that curiosity...   just saying.   
 

Younger people get very few joint replacements, yet they're also getting more than older people did at the same age. This means you can choose between 'Why are millennials getting so (many/few) joint replacements?' depending on which trend fits your current argument better.

Remarkably, this cartoon could also be instructive...
https://xkcd.com/675/
 
 

No.
 
It's your opinion.

I’d be very interested in the actual figures for those unfortunates that actually died from COVID, not the figures including those that are “linked” to COVID (cold, flu, asthma, torn sock etc) that conveniently had COD as COVID on the death certificate.

The Aberdeen postponement is going to be the first of many due to Covid this season. There is no way this league will be played to a finish. The SPFL have crammed in even more fixtures than necessary including deciding to play the league Cup. There are very few free spaces to play postponed games. The obvious solution is to call the season now with us finishing equal third. Excellent season. 

For a start you have no idea what footing I'm on. Not once have I put an opinion on here either way, secondly I am demanding nothing. 
 
I am pointing out you paint opinion as fact which you have stated you do as its probable. I have zero interest in debating with a toddler who will not listen

Don't start telling me why his view is wrong, I couldn't give a f**k either way or who is right or wrong. I'm also not getting into any debate with you. 
 
As I said, people aren't saying anything because of your view, it's because you paint it as fact. When that is pointed out you do what you've done above or start using mixed up capitals and lower case letters, that is the childish part. Believing you are absolutely 100% correct and everybody else is wrong is the smug part, and it doesn't matter the subject. 
I skipped your post as soon as you started telling me why he was wrong, but on the final part about holding your hands up when your wrong, that's the issue. Right now nobody knows who is right or wrong. Including the people leading the research, yet you shout fact at everything you post. 
You call things fact when they are not a fact, maybe probable but not a fact. You turn every debate into right or wrong so there is actually no debate on the merits of any side of the argument, no middle ground, no conceding that someone may have a point regarding anything. 
You have zero interest in hearing Anyone's opinion if it doesn't match your own, and you bludgeon them with zero evidence of anything all the time shouting fact. There is no debate. It turns into playground shite every single time because of this. There are probably half decent points in there somewhere but nobody reads them because they stop at the first misplaced call of fact. 
If you were open to actually having a debate with people, listening to other points of view, and posting your opinion not painted as a fact they would possibly have a debate, but not the way you act just now. 
 
I believe we have had this very conversation before regarding the way you "debate" so I'm probably wasting my time here. 
 

My mothers two sisters had dugs, one had a yorkie that knew I hated it and couldn't do anything about it. (My Possil born and bread uncle would have kicked my heid in)[emoji23]

The other had a Jack Russell called Ranger that I hated even more. That one didn't have a mad mental uncle to protect it. That learnt very early not to try and bite or nip at me. [emoji108]

Had a staffie before they became a junkies companion. Stupid thing thought it could take on anything with 4 legs. Yeah cats, other dogs I could understand but why and I never could work out cows and horses.

Daein the crossword in the National the day and the theme is Scottish dug breeds. Came across this daein ma research/cheating:
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paisley_Terrier
 
According to this Yorkshire Terriers came frae this breed so I cannae even blame "them" for the wee yappy horror next door. Or her dug...
 
[emoji846]

Well, the pie will be there, he's to report with you.

Never said I had fishes 😉
 
That is a fact 😂

Oh, ffs, do you have a vendetta against that poor wee victimised boy too? [emoji38]

I understand the point you are TRYING to make but your point and example are flawed.
 
As I have said, all you need to do is phrase things as your opinion (or somebody else's) and the problem goes away.
 
If you said "government figures show", "government advisors claim" or "scientists say" a specific thing, then that is totally different to the way you post things (and not just on this topic). You post that a specific thing IS, when you don't have enough evidence to draw a valid conclusion - no caveats, nothing, just IS, because, well, just because you say it IS. Even saying "the evidence at this moment points to" would better than what you do.
 
What you are having for dinner, or whether it is your favourite, is of no interest to me. I am willing to accept that at face value as it won't affect me, or anyone outside your immediate circle, in the slightest. Making claims that a specific action can save lives, can affect people outside of your immediate circle. The point that you use this flawed example, shows that you have no idea why some things require evidence, while some don't. If you said you had a pet dog I would take that at face value (I know dogs exist and people keep them as pets), if you said you had a pet extra terrestrial, I would want evidence as that could change lots of things for lots of people.
 
Since you offered, yes, give me evidence of you not winning the lottery 5 times in a row. [emoji38] Well, you offered, and it would be the first thing you've provided evidence for. [emoji38]
 
Oh, and what is this random capital letter nonsense about?
 

I have no argument with any of that.

However, that's not what he was saying, and he doesn't seem to understand the difference.