I actually think there are correct observations from both. The way I saw it, LPM raised 3 points at the same time, the committee then began to answer each point in turn. Once the first answer was given LPM tried to come back in but was told that he had had his turn. I personally thought he should have had a right to reply if he was unhappy with the answers given. There did seem to be an unnecessary haste to get onto the next questions from the floor and get the meeting over and done with as quickly as possible. George did ask if there were any more questions from the members and as no hands were raised he then moved on. I don't think there were any irritated committee members but I think they did fail to grasp the general feeling that clarity is going to be key to things moving forward. After a bit of debate they seemed to just say its something we can look at, and moved on. I certainly didn't feel like it was the shambles which has been portrayed above, but there are certainly areas for improvement. Unfortunately the turnout wasn't great.