Wilbur

😁😁

😁😁

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Would someone please explain to me why having SGG back on the board of SMFC is a negative ?
As I see it he is hugely experienced in the prudent running of a football club, he understands the politics of Scottish football and the SFA/SPFL, and he has already demonstrated his commitment to SMFC having pulled the club out of the shit once before so why would he now do anything that he believed would be non-beneficial or harmful to SMFC ?
Has he ever acted in any way against the best interests of the club ? If so, remind me.

My point is, with that succession of appointments, which certainly were not in the best interests of the club, we ended up on the brink of demotion to the third tier.
Of course, it wasn't done on purpose, but it was a sign that his time was up. That should be it IMO.
 
 
 
 

Of course, my mistake.

Of course, my mistake.

He has been voted onto the SMiSA board not the club board and not been selected to replace Alan Wardrop

Yet again a moan abour SGG turns in to a Kibble debate.
Like him or loathe him, at least SGG and the consortium all were resonably successful business men who had experience in running a buiness. The club played the Hampden game, financial management game in very difficult times for the Club and Scottish football.
Maybe he has an agenda, but doesnt everybody. 
Selling and getting their money back annoyed many fans, but it is easy to moan when it is not your money.  They forget it was the consortium who put their money where their mouthes were when the Club was in danger.  Just look at the poor uptake to the previous share issues when the Club needed money, fans cannot actually financially support a club in difficult times.  To most of us small shareholders, it was a matter of the heart, not the greatest financial deal we had ever done.  That is probably why we still chip in our money each month.
How many Celtic fans hate Fergus Mccann walking away with a tidy profit yet are happy that he saved the club, brought professional business practices and was probably the one who set the financial model for those that followed.
We all love the club, love the concept of fan ownership but I would be very concerned about most of the fans on a Saturday actually being involved in running it day to day.
This message was partly due to reading the statement of the SMISAClub Board nominee.  I found after reading it, that it was full of lovely ideas and concepts but I had no idea if the guy actually had the skill set to run the business.  Hopefully that may come out on here in the coming days.

SS1877, do you know the answers to those questions or are you just speculating ? If you do know, please share with those of us who are still in the dark. 
 

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Aye, because SG is the lifelong St Mirren supporter who committed large sums of his own money to rescue our club from an asset stripper who would have put the club into administration / liquidation for personal gain, and whose prudent financial policies returned stability to our basket case of a club, and who conned Tesco into providing us with a stadium fit for our needs has been elected back onto our club board.
Aye, who would want a complete c*nt like him to be in any way involved in the future of our club ??
Honestly, please enlighten me, what are the negatives of his involvement ?

Ross County's central defence consists of huge agricultural lummocks , non-skilled thugs with  the turning circle of a supertanker. High balls would be food and drink to them. We need passing and pace up front. We have to sacrifice Main from the starting XI and play Ayunga and Grieve up front. 

Three "bet builder" bets on tonight's football .... 1 up, 1 down, and 1 cashed out early (luckily) because I'm a shitebag sometimes.
 

f**kin useless, lazy, unreliable Napoli cunts!!!😡😡

How's this for a disaster.................................

Thx.

Truss only had one policy.
She, and her (then) Chancellor, declared their intentions. Disaster ensued, and her entire policy had to be reversed. 
She sacked Kwarteng because he did what she wanted him to do. Utterly shameful behaviour hoping to save her own skin.
She has been humiliated, ridiculed and disgraced.
She has zero credibility. She is now a joke figure. Yet she still hasn't resigned. She is a disgusting human being. 
But, on the positive side, she went to school in Paisley for a couple of years.
Fud.

Well done.  I wasn’t far away with a freebie bet builder - a red card for Charlton would have returned nearly £900.
 

Three "bet builder" bets on tonight's football .... 1 up, 1 down, and 1 cashed out early (luckily) because I'm a shitebag sometimes.
 

Truss only had one policy.
She, and her (then) Chancellor, declared their intentions. Disaster ensued, and her entire policy had to be reversed. 
She sacked Kwarteng because he did what she wanted him to do. Utterly shameful behaviour hoping to save her own skin.
She has been humiliated, ridiculed and disgraced.
She has zero credibility. She is now a joke figure. Yet she still hasn't resigned. She is a disgusting human being. 
But, on the positive side, she went to school in Paisley for a couple of years.
Fud.