iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Well this thread certainly worked out well didn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Well this thread certainly worked out well didn't it? Aye, it turned a bit nasti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Aye, it turned a bit nasti. That's those Nationalists for you. You've got to watch them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 That's those Nationalists for you. You've got to watch them! You tell them , sidely eh. . You really are great entertainment value , makes me wonder why you keep getting , banned. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 (edited) You tell them , sidely eh. . You really are great entertainment value , makes me wonder why you keep getting , banned. . Och, it's only happened to me a couple of times because I didn't go to a certain school or some Grammarian bollocks like that. Edited August 19, 2014 by iTony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 You were banned because you didn't got to a school. Shocking. You might want to check someone hasn't edited a post before posting. Also your post doesn't even make any sense. Typical Natsi mudslinging tactics, Cockles, that's just shocking behaviour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 You are nothing if not entertaining my old mucker I'll give you that Hopefully one day you'll learn how to act your age and not your shoe size. Until then , watch out for those Nasti grammarians that are after you. . Hope that chip heals up too. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Good man, SNLT! I like you despite your rather odd politics because you make me laugh also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 If having 'odd politics' means not sharing your views then I'll take it as a huge compliment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iTony Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 If having 'odd politics' means not sharing your views then I'll take it as a huge compliment I knew you were a good 'un deep down! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenston saint Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Ah, they're all getting upset again. It seems to be ok to call people on here "c**t" - a word which I think is despicable and very vulgar I have to say and make comments about people's weight and overall health but the moment these people are flagged up for what they are they start the mudslinging and trying to get folk barred or "silenced". You'll be wearing brown and black shirts next. You're just a poor mans Elvis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil McCracken Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 The abuse aimed at Stuart Dickson on the referendum thread has been much worse. Much worse. Yet, despite the many names these folk have called Stuart, the fact that Stuart has come up with one word which has these people in an absolute rage is hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Its just a shortening of national socialist. Which is what they are of course. Banning words is authoritarian and anti freedom of speech and is almost always peddled by haters of free speech. Like the ludicrous banning of certain words we have used for ages to describe Rangers fans this is just pathetic bleating by a special interest minority group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 The abuse aimed at Stuart Dickson on the referendum thread has been much worse. Much worse. Yet, despite the many names these folk have called Stuart, the fact that Stuart has come up with one word which has these people in an absolute rage is hilarious. : I agree with you. God knows I've knocked StuDick plenty at times over the years almost all of which was related to his attitude to St.Mirren and Stewart Gilmour. A lot of the Yes posters on here have behaved like they were demented. They all say he is crazy, doesn't have a clue, he's not worth listening to but they swallow it and go for it hook ,line and sinker. The digs about his failed marriage were way below the belt but we've come to expect that kind of thing from them. I've developed a reluctant admiration for the guy the way he takes it on the chin and comes straight back. If you read this,Stu, you're still on ignore, you still talk shite about St.Mirren but keep up your No campaign. You are giving us a lot of laughs while some can only simmer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I agree with you. God knows I've knocked StuDick plenty at times over the years almost all of which was related to his attitude to St.Mirren and Stewart Gilmour. A lot of the Yes posters on here have behaved like they were demented. They all say he is crazy, doesn't have a clue, he's not worth listening to but they swallow it and go for it hook ,line and sinker. The digs about his failed marriage were way below the belt but we've come to expect that kind of thing from them. I've developed a reluctant admiration for the guy the way he takes it on the chin and comes straight back. If you read this,Stu, you're still on ignore, you still talk shite about St.Mirren but keep up your No campaign. You are giving us a lot of laughs while some can only simmer. I wholeheartedly agree. I can think of no better way to recruit people to the YES camp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I wholeheartedly agree. I can think of no better way to recruit people to the YES camp. I think you're wrong. In the unlikely event that a neutral in the debate read the thread in detail, I think the pack animal type behaviour of the Yes group would be counter productive to their failing cause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeBud Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I think you're wrong. In the unlikely event that a neutral in the debate read the thread in detail, I think the pack animal type behaviour of the Yes group would be counter productive to their failing cause. I am still neutral but in my case you're 100% wrong RickMcD!! I'm not suggesting for a second that everyone will think like me though, I've never felt important enough to think I speak for the masses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 (edited) Its just a shortening of national socialist. Which is what they are of course. Banning words is authoritarian and anti freedom of speech and is almost always peddled by haters of free speech. Like the ludicrous banning of certain words we have used for ages to describe Rangers fans this is just pathetic bleating by a special interest minority group. While that is the meaning you would be a naïve fool to dismiss the connotations the word conjures up. This "free speech" is open to abuse when people, quite openly, use words & terms that are offensive. It's a fine line but the word were discussing I find very offensive, and as such, I feel should be banned. I suppose I'm allowed that opinion? Just to clarify, it's the word I find offensive, using it is not deserving of a ban, on it's own, for anybody. Edited August 20, 2014 by faraway saint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I agree with you. God knows I've knocked StuDick plenty at times over the years almost all of which was related to his attitude to St.Mirren and Stewart Gilmour. A lot of the Yes posters on here have behaved like they were demented. They all say he is crazy, doesn't have a clue, he's not worth listening to but they swallow it and go for it hook ,line and sinker. The digs about his failed marriage were way below the belt but we've come to expect that kind of thing from them. I've developed a reluctant admiration for the guy the way he takes it on the chin and comes straight back. If you read this,Stu, you're still on ignore, you still talk shite about St.Mirren but keep up your No campaign. You are giving us a lot of laughs while some can only simmer. So, it's only Yes campaigners who are abusing Dicko, eh? What was the story before the referendum was announced then? Were they Yes men but didn't know it yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I am still neutral but in my case you're 100% wrong RickMcD!! I'm not suggesting for a second that everyone will think like me though, I've never felt important enough to think I speak for the masses. Drew thinks Stu's input is good for the Yes campaign. I think the personal attacks on Stu might be counter-productive to the Yes people. You think I'm wrong. Does that mean you think Drew's right? I think you're wrong in thinking that I would presume to think or speak for the masses. I think I can think what I like. I think you can think what you like. Have you ever heard of The Thought Police? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Drew thinks Stu's input is good for the Yes campaign. I think the personal attacks on Stu might be counter-productive to the Yes people. You think I'm wrong. Does that mean you think Drew's right? I think you're wrong in thinking that I would presume to think or speak for the masses. I think I can think what I like. I think you can think what you like. Have you ever heard of The Thought Police? Let me think about that for a minute................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 So, it's only Yes campaigners who are abusing Dicko, eh? What was the story before the referendum was announced then? Were they Yes men but didn't know it yet? I'd reply if I knew what the f*ck you're going on about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 Its just a shortening of national socialist. Which is what they are of course. Banning words is authoritarian and anti freedom of speech and is almost always peddled by haters of free speech. Like the ludicrous banning of certain words we have used for ages to describe Rangers fans this is just pathetic bleating by a special interest minority group. Not all nationalists are socialists. In fact, it could be argued that capitalist ideals would rather see the UK divided into it's component parts and let them stand or fall by their own actions and abilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I'd reply if I knew what the f*ck you're going on about. Your words - A lot of the Yes posters on here have behaved like they were demented. They all say he is crazy, doesn't have a clue, he's not worth listening to but they swallow it and go for it hook ,line and sinker. The digs about his failed marriage were way below the belt but we've come to expect that kind of thing from them. i.e. It's the Yes men who are abusing him. Even those who abused him prior to the independence debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted August 20, 2014 Report Share Posted August 20, 2014 I'd reply if I knew what the f*ck you're going on about.That's ironic Rick, given the post you made directly after it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.