bluto Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Yes, wallers, I was muddled, although I do think it may be similar to the use of warmer, another wee cheeky chappy sort of put down. For simplicity I prefer the generic Walloper Walloper, I have always liked. Warmer, too. In hindsight, could your TT just maybe have had an auto-correct of the anglicised Wally (in plural)? Wallies... http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/wally That description would fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Our inaction is a result of us being a democratic country following the will of the majority. That's no bad thing. Fortunately, the natsis on this forum will not leap upon the above statement and help you ruin another thread.... :Now.... Where did I leave that spoon of mine....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barney Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 We (that is Europe and the US) should have overthrown Assad in 2013 when the socialists and nationalists forced the country to sit on its hands. Had we done that we'd have throttled ISIS early on. Instead we left desperate people to turn to whatever help and support they could get and we gave ISIS a strong foothold in the country. As for now well there is nothing the UK can do unless parliament backs the government and it's military advisors. All we can do in Syria is act in our own self defence as we did do with the drone strike. Our inaction is a result of us being a democratic country following the will of the majority. That's no bad thing. But what I can't stand is how revisionist the same people become when criticising the government for doing nothing when the only reason it's doing nothing is because they blocked the government from taking action. The pathetic point scoring over the refugees is utter ridiculous and should be called out for the political opportunism that it really is. Would Assad being over thrown not have just left a vacuum similar to saddam hussain in Iraq? was that not the main reason for a more passive approach to Syria? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaside Nipper Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Walloper, I have always liked. Warmer, too. In hindsight, could your TT just maybe have had an auto-correct of the anglicised Wally (in plural)? Wallies... http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/wally That description would fit. Are you Rachel Riley in disguise Golly, what jolly folly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Are you Rachel Riley in disguise I've been asked before if she was my sister. (Btw, she's the pretty one, right? ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Got to love those lefty wankers. First they don't want us to make Syria safe for the people who live there. They don't want any military intervention there. Then Syrians start fleeing their country. Next thing we know they are drowning trying to get to the safety of Europe. Now they want military intervention - they want our Navy to spend all their time patrolling vast expanse of the Med trying to find the tiniest rubber dingys - ensuring, of course that we rescue every single one cause heaven help us if one person drowns. Then they want us to open our country to any and all of the 22.85m Syrians who are fleeing, even though most of them don't actually want to come to Britain. When our Government says we'll take loads of asylum seekers but we don't want to encourage them into the Med so we'll get them from the refugee camps the daft f**kers get all critical again and they roll out the wee would be dictator to announce she'd happily take Asylum Seekers into her home - presumably to get them to work as cheap cleaners for her earning cash in hand. And then when it's revealed that our government killed a couple of people who were plotting to plant bombs in the UK the same idiotic left wingers criticise our government for protecting us. All I can say is thank f**k these Nationalists and Socialists are nowhere near our defence and foreign policy. What a f**king disaster they would have been. Yes you would probably have them all gassed. These desperate people are fleeing, they are the victims. If Scotland was being internally destroyed - would you just hang about. Of course they don't want to come to Britain but their homes are being destroyed..... you seem to be confusing lefty with compassion. Sometimes politics has to take a back seat and compassion is what is required. The OP was about people who would kill us being killed, not victims Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sally02 Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 We (that is Europe and the US) should have overthrown Assad in 2013 when the socialists and nationalists forced the country to sit on its hands. Had we done that we'd have throttled ISIS early on. Instead we left desperate people to turn to whatever help and support they could get and we gave ISIS a strong foothold in the country. As for now well there is nothing the UK can do unless parliament backs the government and it's military advisors. All we can do in Syria is act in our own self defence as we did do with the drone strike. Our inaction is a result of us being a democratic country following the will of the majority. That's no bad thing. But what I can't stand is how revisionist the same people become when criticising the government for doing nothing when the only reason it's doing nothing is because they blocked the government from taking action. The pathetic point scoring over the refugees is utter ridiculous and should be called out for the political opportunism that it really is. So now you are speaking on behalf of all the good people of Europe and the USA, and presuming that their nationalists and socialists, as well as ours, sat on their hands and did hee-haw! You couldn't make it up! Ooh, but you just did! Olet yksi ylimielinen paskiainen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 If I recall the Westminster plan in 2013 was to bomb assads forces and at the same time arm those fighting him. That'll be isis amongst others. What could've gone wrong with that plan... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 It would've been perfect if it hadn't been for those pesky natsis. Is that how you turn everything into "SNP Bad"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 It's funny how their co conspirators in the UK have not been identified and arrested, but they can kill 2 people in the middle of nowhere and appear to know everything about their motives intentions and location. I do not believe a word that comes from the British Govt, I think the bombings against parliaments wishes were about to become public and they concocted this cock and bull story to get the public on their side and give them the go ahead for more. This happened a month ago yet their families knew nothing about it makes me wonder if they are even dead did they ever really exist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Got to love those lefty wankers. First they don't want us to make Syria safe for the people who live there. They don't want any military intervention there. Then Syrians start fleeing their country. Next thing we know they are drowning trying to get to the safety of Europe. Now they want military intervention - they want our Navy to spend all their time patrolling vast expanse of the Med trying to find the tiniest rubber dingys - ensuring, of course that we rescue every single one cause heaven help us if one person drowns. Then they want us to open our country to any and all of the 22.85m Syrians who are fleeing, even though most of them don't actually want to come to Britain. When our Government says we'll take loads of asylum seekers but we don't want to encourage them into the Med so we'll get them from the refugee camps the daft f**kers get all critical again and they roll out the wee would be dictator to announce she'd happily take Asylum Seekers into her home - presumably to get them to work as cheap cleaners for her earning cash in hand. And then when it's revealed that our government killed a couple of people who were plotting to plant bombs in the UK the same idiotic left wingers criticise our government for protecting us. All I can say is thank f**k these Nationalists and Socialists are nowhere near our defence and foreign policy. What a f**king disaster they would have been. Yeah its be such a spectacular success hundreds of thousands of people from the region you mention are risking their childrens lives to get away from it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 This one is for Dave & Dicko.... its always good to find out the reaction of your actions. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34193762 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 I noticed. Glad someone could get the use of it whilst I was out of town. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Every time I see Drew profile picture I think of this thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted September 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 I huvnae got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted September 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Naw, ahm no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted September 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Borrowed from Morrisons Cafe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted September 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 Aye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray street Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 FLIP FLOP PING PONG repeat to fade........................................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer Posted September 9, 2015 Report Share Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) Fuk me..what a bunch of dicks.. Edited September 9, 2015 by strummer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Would Assad being over thrown not have just left a vacuum similar to saddam hussain in Iraq? was that not the main reason for a more passive approach to Syria? Well funnily enough the number of asylum seekers coming to the UK from Iraq has fallen through the floor since Hussain was removed from power so that would suggest the populous of Iraq feel a damn sight safer than they did when Hussain was gassing them in the hills Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 Yes you would probably have them all gassed. These desperate people are fleeing, they are the victims. If Scotland was being internally destroyed - would you just hang about. Of course they don't want to come to Britain but their homes are being destroyed..... you seem to be confusing lefty with compassion. Sometimes politics has to take a back seat and compassion is what is required. The OP was about people who would kill us being killed, not victims Sorry? What the f**k? You do know that the reason Cameron and Obama wanted the West to intervene in Syria in the first place was that there was evidence that Assad had launched a chemical attack on his people breaching international law. It was the socialist and nationalist left that voted the motion down at Westminster meaning we were powerless against Assad. Now you claim I would probably have had them all gassed? Turn the mirror back on yourself ya fanny. By calling on our politicians to do nothing you allowed Assad to gas his people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 If I recall the Westminster plan in 2013 was to bomb assads forces and at the same time arm those fighting him. That'll be isis amongst others. What could've gone wrong with that plan... You are wrong. The motion put to the House of Commons was for UK troops to be involved in military action in Syria. There was no proposal to arm the rebels, we were simply going to intervene to enforce International Law and to stop Assad from using Chemical Weapons on his own people. It was the socialists and the nationalists who demanded that we take no action and that we let those atrocities carry on. Now the nationalists and the socialists believe they have a solution. Somehow we're going to migrate as many of the 22.8m Syrians from there homes and the country they love and we're going to force them to set up home somewhere in Europe where they don't want to be. And somehow Cameron is the bad guy? Wankers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 This one is for Dave & Dicko.... its always good to find out the reaction of your actions. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34193762 Did you read it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted September 10, 2015 Report Share Posted September 10, 2015 I'm not wrong dicko. It was proposed by William Hague, who was foreign secretary. You obviously also aren't aware of the BBC being caught faking a chemical weapons report from Syria. You should take a holiday... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.