St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 I am amazed at the number of contradictory statements made on Governance and Conditions regarding to both of these. My question is: Should there not be a clear communication route for both on the Forum where a designated person from each deals with the issues raised. This would ensure transparency and direct traffic to the appropriate decision maker/link person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 WTF? On 12/19/2016 at 2:39 PM, St.Ricky said: Posting this a little early but also intend it to be my final post on the Forums. It would obviously be great to win the game and finish the year on a high but Morton have been playing well consistently this season so it is a big ask. But if you don't ask you don't get or so it is said, so come on the Buddies. Finish the year on a high. Any kind of win would do. Thanks to those who have liked some of my posts and thanks also to those who took the time to say they didn't. My Internet posting days are behind me. Come on ye Saints. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, stlucifer said: WTF? WTF I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 FFS, is there no end to this.........................wait........................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) I hope so. When clarity is there When governance is transparent Do you pay £10 per month? Did you pay a founders fee? Are you getting what you thought? Traducing people online doesn't make your point stronger. Edited January 5, 2017 by St.Ricky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 8 minutes ago, St.Ricky said: I hope so. When clarity is there When governance is transparent Do you pay £10 per month? Did you pay a founders fee? Are you getting what you thought? Traducing people online doesn't make your point stronger. Go feck yerself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 1 minute ago, faraway saint said: Go feck yerself. Ah dear. You can do better than that. Despite all of your bluster and language I have a string feeling that there is a food brain in there. Why not apply it to the question and then you, like me, won't feel the need or have any reason to post on these topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraway saint Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Just now, St.Ricky said: Ah dear. You can do better than that. Despite all of your bluster and language I have a string feeling that there is a food brain in there. Why not apply it to the question and then you, like me, won't feel the need or have any reason to post on these topics. Go swivel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, faraway saint said: Go swivel. Edited January 5, 2017 by St.Ricky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) 11 hours ago, St.Ricky said: I am amazed at the number of contradictory statements made on Governance and Conditions regarding to both of these. My question is: Should there not be a clear communication route for both on the Forum where a designated person from each deals with the issues raised. This would ensure transparency and direct traffic to the appropriate decision maker/link person. This purpose of internet forums is to keep nutters like us out of the way of normal folks. I totally agree with your point you lovely man, although I also think it's totally rubbish and will be coming round to your house to pelt you with radishes. Edited January 6, 2017 by Bud the Baker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TediousTom Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 In reply to the original posters question Why do we need to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 57 minutes ago, TediousTom said: In reply to the original posters question Why do we need to? Good question. The test of being in a clique is that one doesn't recognise that one exists..... because you are in it. I support the buy out I support the 1877 Club Am I fed up with all of the stuff posted online about both .. then yes. Therefore ....why not look at improving the processes involved? No one is forced to turn their thoughts to this. Ignore is an option. Feel free to use this of the mood takes you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Has anyone posted 'great thread' yet? Maybe a cheeky wee 'FFS'? No? This forum is going to the dogs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 The number of St Mirren supporters who use this forum is minuscule. Maybe the groups you refer to Rick require better communication streams but this forum is not the place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 I agree, sonny. i have string feeling this is not a place where sane creatures meet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 6 minutes ago, antrin said: i have string feeling this is not a place where sane creatures meet. Just as well someone created a new thread then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, oaksoft said: Just as well someone created a new thread then. Nice one. you do realise it is intentional, of course? Edited January 5, 2017 by antrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Just now, antrin said: Nice one. you our do realise it is intentional, of course? Yeah I cottoned onto that quite quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted January 5, 2017 Report Share Posted January 5, 2017 Seamless punning, tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted January 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 15 hours ago, Sonny said: The number of St Mirren supporters who use this forum is minuscule. Maybe the groups you refer to Rick require better communication streams but this forum is not the place. Sonny. You may well be right. There are other, perhaps more effective ways but these are not yet in place. Given time, I hope and believe that these will be. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 18 hours ago, St.Ricky said: I am amazed at the number of contradictory statements made on Governance and Conditions regarding to both of these. My question is: Should there not be a clear communication route for both on the Forum where a designated person from each deals with the issues raised. This would ensure transparency and direct traffic to the appropriate decision maker/link person. Of course there should be clear communication. I can't speak for the 1877 club - I've never been a member there and only found out last week that there is actually a committee for the 1877 club, but certainly SMiSA have to up their game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whydowebother Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 Seamless punning, tonight. Worry not, there will be someone who gets the needle about all this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlucifer Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, whydowebother said: Worry not, there will be someone who gets the needle about all this. Darn it! You beat me to it. Now I'm running out of material. Does that mean I'm anti-sewtial? Edited January 6, 2017 by stlucifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TediousTom Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Stuart Dickson said: Of course there should be clear communication. I can't speak for the 1877 club - I've never been a member there and only found out last week that there is actually a committee for the 1877 club, but certainly SMiSA have to up their game. One of the great things about clearcommunication is, when communicated in a clear way one only needs to make a point or express an opinion ONCE. Edited to add: Proper spacing between words also helps Edited January 6, 2017 by TediousTom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Dickson Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 2 hours ago, TediousTom said: One of the great things about clearcommunication is, when communicated in a clear way one only needs to make a point or express an opinion ONCE. Edited to add: Proper spacing between words also helps Hmm, see thats true when you deal with sensible grown ups. But anyone with children knows that repetition is sometimes the only way to get the message through. It's not very grown up for an organisations board to ignore present or past members. Don't you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.