Current Form Table

[Sweeper07 3,979]

Not much between 7 sides over the previous 6 sets of League matches. I will attach the table below.

Reality is we were 2nd worse during these games, but the Hammers were even worse.  RC's goal difference took a battering too...

My hope and expectation is that this is the lowest point. JG has the team playing a bit better now and when the goals start rolling in, we will shoot up the form and league tables.

I will post an update every so often.  We have a real chance of winning matches over the next 8 fixtures - I hope we can win at least 3 of these and a few draws...   

 

                                                                                                Played       Won      Drawn    Lost     Goals F    Goals A  Difference   Points won

6	St Johnstone	6	2	1	3	6	11	-5	7	LLDLWW
7	Hearts	6	1	3	2	3	4	-1	6	WdLDdL
8	Ross County	6	1	3	2	6	15	-9	6	WdDLDL
9	Hibernian	6	0	5	1	8	9	-1	5	LDDDDD
10	Livingston	6	1	2	3	6	8	-2	5	LLWLdD
11	St Mirren	6	1	2	3	2	5	-3	5	ddLWLL
12	Hamilton	6	1	2	3	5	11	-6	5	dWLDLL

Edited November 1, 2019 by Sweeper07
Titles added

[Long John Baldy 344]

Ha ha 

[DougJamie 6,647]

Sweeper, this isn't really relevant

Look who has played who...………. Ross County have had Ugly Sisters and away at Hibs in last 3...……..

The Form table shows us 12th …………..

If we want to improve this, just keep looking at the League table

[Long John Baldy 344]

5 minutes ago, DougJamie said:

Sweeper, this isn't really relevant

Look who has played who...………. Ross County have had Ugly Sisters and away at Hibs in last 3...……..

The Form table shows us 12th …………..

If we want to improve this, just keep looking at the League table

You're right, irrelevant, like the guy who started it. 

[Sweeper07 3,979]

43 minutes ago, DougJamie said:

Sweeper, this isn't really relevant

Look who has played who...………. Ross County have had Ugly Sisters and away at Hibs in last 3...……..

The Form table shows us 12th …………..

If we want to improve this, just keep looking at the League table

OF course it is relevant - that is why you can find these tables on all the main football web sites. We played Tic during this period too.

So when we come back to the form table in a months time, we can see who we have gained on over that period AND of course that will translate in the actual League table.

If it is not for you fine. The fact that the forum attention seeking clown simply uses it as another way to abuse me is fine too - he is due a permanent ban anyway. His form is very very low always anyway! 

[Cornwall_Saint 4,024]

11 hours ago, Sweeper07 said:

OF course it is relevant - that is why you can find these tables on all the main football web sites. We played Tic during this period too.

So when we come back to the form table in a months time, we can see who we have gained on over that period AND of course that will translate in the actual League table.

If it is not for you fine. The fact that the forum attention seeking clown simply uses it as another way to abuse me is fine too - he is due a permanent ban anyway. His form is very very low always anyway! 

Fair play to starting a thread, but I do feel it’s more important to look at the table where all teams have met once instead of a form table which shows some who may have played the bigots twice, and some who won’t have, it does leave it a bit skewed. The table at 11,22,33 and 38 games concern me the most (or 9,28,27,36 if we were lower league). It’s the only time you have a true reflection of where you actually stand.

[Cornwall_Saint 4,024]

Yes, I realise I f**ked the numbers up there 🙄

9,18,27,36...

Now campaigning for “Bring Back the Edit” thingy

[TediousTom 3,683]

We are underperforming, underperforming indeed,

 

We have been since 1988......time to face it, we are not well  run

[jaybee 1,608]

On 11/1/2019 at 10:40 AM, Long John Baldy said:

Ha ha 

Wrong again buddy, the groups name is A-ha.             😎

[DougJamie 6,647]

Off subject..Why are there so many morans at the BBC. Today under Celtic 30 in a row bore states...                   "Worse was to come as St Mirren, then in the Championship, stunned Celtic in the last four before his final season brought another huge upset..".... well here was me think we played top flight football. In 2013. ???

[Sweeper07 3,979]

12 hours ago, Cornwall_Saint said:

Fair play to starting a thread, but I do feel it’s more important to look at the table where all teams have met once instead of a form table which shows some who may have played the bigots twice, and some who won’t have, it does leave it a bit skewed. The table at 11,22,33 and 38 games concern me the most (or 9,28,27,36 if we were lower league). It’s the only time you have a true reflection of where you actually stand.

OF course you are correct in high lighting the bigger picture - what the form tables show though is the more recent picture: Of course it is skewed by who each team plays, but it lets us see if we are gaining or losing anything to our competitors in the short term and what kind of run each team is on.

There will be surprise results like us beating the Dons too though! Yet the reality is we need wins against our nearest rivals rather than draws or narrow defeats !

Here's hoping we string some results together, just like the Fakes have these last 2 games - until that point they had not won and were rooted at the foot of the table.. a couple of wins in the next 2 - 4 games and we will be above them and others I would think...  

[Wendy Saintss 2,652]

What a ridiculous topic 

 

[Sweeper07 3,979]

says a ridiculous imbecile . . .  never forget your major bloomer !!!!  🤡

You don't like it or have anything constructive to say - then leave it to those that do . . .  our form actually does matter !

[Long John Baldy 344]

On 11/2/2019 at 2:16 PM, Wendy Saintss said:

What a ridiculous topic 

 

It's not even a form guide, it's a league table. ha ha 

[Sweeper07 3,979]

6	St Johnstone	6	2	2	2	8	11	-3	8	DLWWLD
7	St Mirren	6	2	0	4	7	11	-4	6	WLLLWL
8	Motherwell	6	2	0	4	6	12	-6	6	LLWWLL
9	Hearts	6	1	2	3	6	8	-2	5	LDdLWL
10	Hamilton	6	0	3	3	8	12	-4	3	DLLDDL
11	Livingston	6	0	2	4	4	12	-8	2	LdDLLL
12	Ross County	6	0	2	4	6	19	-13	2	LDLDLL

[bazil85 2,602]

2 hours ago, Sweeper07 said:

6	St Johnstone	6	2	2	2	8	11	-3	8	DLWWLD
7	St Mirren	6	2	0	4	7	11	-4	6	WLLLWL
8	Motherwell	6	2	0	4	6	12	-6	6	LLWWLL
9	Hearts	6	1	2	3	6	8	-2	5	LDdLWL
10	Hamilton	6	0	3	3	8	12	-4	3	DLLDDL
11	Livingston	6	0	2	4	4	12	-8	2	LdDLLL
12	Ross County	6	0	2	4	6	19	-13	2	LDLDLL

Careful, Lohn John says this kind of analysis isn't allowed... 

[Long John Baldy 344]

Pointless, like the OP and Brazil. 

[bazil85 2,602]

54 minutes ago, Long John Baldy said:

Pointless, like the OP and Brazil. 

You won't be saying that when they've cut down the last of their trees... 

[Sweeper07 3,979]

1 hour ago, bazil85 said:

Careful, Lohn John says this kind of analysis isn't allowed... 

I don't read his stuff - jus the stuff from him that folk react too - he's desperate for attention and I have better things to do with my time . . .

[Long John Baldy 344]

46 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said:

I don't read his stuff - jus the stuff from him that folk react too - he's desperate for attention and I have better things to do with my time . . .

Like post utter drivel? Ha ha 

[Slartibartfast 7,853]

4 minutes ago, Long John Baldy said:

Like post utter drivel? Ha ha 

No, he has to thank his god for giving children cancer.

Edited November 28, 2019 by Slartibartfast

[Long John Baldy 344]

2 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:

No, he has to thank his god for giving children cancer.

Shameful, yet thinks he's better than most, thank god I don't know him. 

[Sweeper07 3,979]

make up stuff about people, take things completely out of context etc. etc. - how truly sad !!!!!  

Its not your form on judging others on this thread - it's the form of St. Mirren . . .

Edited November 28, 2019 by Sweeper07

[oaksoft 11,556]

6 hours ago, bazil85 said:

Careful, Lohn John says this kind of analysis isn't allowed... 

Technically, showing data without interpretation is not analysis. You are a stats person. You're supposed to know this stuff. 

What is interesting is that regardless of who is playing who, more than half the teams in this league are having a f**king dreadful season and can't string more than 2 wins together. Any team which can put 3 good wins together is going to storm away from the "peleton".

Edited November 28, 2019 by oaksoft

[bazil85 2,602]

48 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

Technically, showing data without interpretation is not analysis. You are a stats person. You're supposed to know this stuff. 

What is interesting is that regardless of who is playing who, more than half the teams in this league are having a f**king dreadful season and can't string more than 2 wins together. Any team which can put 3 good wins together is going to storm away from the "peleton".

Still with the desperation to show where I'm wrong eh? Yep I'll give you that one, there wasn't any analysis, although I was referring to Baldy not liking the stats used for analysis, as per another thread we engaged on. 😁

I'm not sure if your last part is all that "interesting" seems to be how most seasons go, only real difference this season is we don't have two teams that have had an even worse start than you describe.