smcc Posted October 3, 2020 Report Posted October 3, 2020 21 minutes ago, stlucifer said: While I don't accept his claim, it is entirely feasible, as the 1% may have died from something else before being clear of covid. Would they all have died of something else if they had not developed Covid? Quote
stlucifer Posted October 3, 2020 Report Posted October 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, smcc said: Would they all have died of something else if they had not developed Covid? In this theoretical example.... Yes. Quote
Cookie Monster Posted October 3, 2020 Report Posted October 3, 2020 1% could still have it.That can't be correct because of the over 99% figure. [emoji14] Quote
stlucifer Posted October 3, 2020 Report Posted October 3, 2020 31 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said: That can't be correct because of the over 99% figure. PEDANT ALERT! 🤣 Quote
Cookie Monster Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 1% could still have it.It was about the past tense, didn't you get that. [emoji14] Quote
salmonbuddie Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 I haven't checked (and don't want to in case it spoils it) but one effect of this virus is me wishing I had shares in a company that manufactures tinfoil - sales must be through the roof... Quote
Cookie Monster Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 I haven't checked (and don't want to in case it spoils it) but one effect of this virus is me wishing I had shares in a company that manufactures tinfoil - sales must be through the roof... Apparently shares in hydroxychloroquine have nose dived in the last couple of days. [emoji848] Quote
branniganm Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 17 hours ago, smcc said: Would they all have died of something else if they had not developed Covid? The answer is yes. People have been dieing way before covid 19 turned up. The biggest risk factor for dieing is being old. If and when "they" can provide true and accurate stats of people who have died of covid 19 ALONE, it will be a small figure. Yes I'm being a smart arse, but if you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer. Quote
Slarti Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 It was about the past tense, didn't you get that. [emoji14]At that hypothetical moment in the past, 1% could still have had the virus. Quote
Slarti Posted October 4, 2020 Report Posted October 4, 2020 Would they all have died of something else if they had not developed Covid?As far as we know, everyone dies. So, yes. Quote
smcc Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 (edited) 18 hours ago, Slarti said: As far as we know, everyone dies. So, yes. Edited October 5, 2020 by smcc Quote
smcc Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 (edited) 18 hours ago, branniganm said: The answer is yes. People have been dieing way before covid 19 turned up. The biggest risk factor for dieing is being old. If and when "they" can provide true and accurate stats of people who have died of covid 19 ALONE, it will be a small figure. Yes I'm being a smart arse, but if you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer. 18 hours ago, Slarti said: As far as we know, everyone dies. So, yes. But would they have died at this time? probably not. 18 hours ago, branniganm said: 18 hours ago, Slarti said: Edited October 5, 2020 by smcc Quote
oaksoft Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 1 hour ago, smcc said: But would they have died at this time? probably not. And you are basing this on what exactly? Quote
smcc Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 1 hour ago, oaksoft said: And you are basing this on what exactly? Covid 19 is a serious illness which is likely to tip the balance in people with underlying conditions. Quote
Slarti Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 4 hours ago, smcc said: But would they have died at this time? probably not. I don't know, neither do you and neither does anyone else. They could have died even sooner due to something else that they could have been exposed to if not for the restrictions put in place. Quote
oaksoft Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 4 hours ago, smcc said: Covid 19 is a serious illness which is likely to tip the balance in people with underlying conditions. You're just getting into a guessing game now. Quote
Cookie Monster Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 You're just getting into a guessing game now.I need to run to the toilet. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Quote
BuddieinEK Posted October 5, 2020 Report Posted October 5, 2020 Killie have had to forfeit their cup match! Quote
Bud the Baker Posted October 11, 2020 Report Posted October 11, 2020 (edited) The Taxpayers Alliance, a great bunch of lads! Quote Taxpayers' Alliance: Cut pensioner benefits 'immediately' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34439965 Particularly liked the the following quote from Alex Wild... Quote "The first of which will sound a little bit morbid - some of the people... won't be around to vote against you in the next election. So that's just a practical point, and the other point is they might have forgotten by then." He added: "If you did it now, chances are that in 2020 someone who has had their winter fuel cut might be thinking, 'Oh I can't remember, was it this government or was it the last one? I'm not quite sure.' I'll bet Mr. Wild is already hatching plans to bump off his parents for his inheritance. Edited October 11, 2020 by Bud the Baker Quote
Cookie Monster Posted October 11, 2020 Report Posted October 11, 2020 I've just found out, if you press and hold down the space bar, you can navigate along the sentence you may need to edit instead of trying to poke in between letters that can be tricky for us all with large digits. [emoji16]This tip has been brought to you as I'm bored sitting in the house cause no where is open to enjoy a beer with the football. [emoji17] Quote
Bud the Baker Posted October 20, 2020 Report Posted October 20, 2020 (edited) Well it looks like I called this one wrong back in the spring - I thought we'd have a bit of a baby boom! Quote The sale of Durex jumped when social-distancing rules were relaxed in the summer, says maker Reckitt Benckiser. The consumer goods giant said growth in its health arm, which includes condoms and "sexual wellbeing products", rose 12.6% in the last three months. Sales of Dettol, Cillit Bang, and air fresheners also jumped, helped by workers improving their new home-office environment, Reckitt said. Total group sales in the last quarter rose 13% to £3.5bn on last year. "Relaxations of social distancing regulations resulted in improved demand for our sexual well-being products," it said. During the spring lockdown Reckitt saw a sharp drop in demand for condoms as people had less sex. However, the company suggested on Tuesday that this spring fall could have a knock-on effect on its baby formula business next year, with an expected fall in the global birth rate. "There is evidence that birth rates will be further lowered in coming quarters as a result of behaviour changes related to the pandemic," it said. "Our performance has been led by an increase in hygiene and health volumes," said boss Laxman Narasimhan. Sales of Dettol-branded sprays, wipes and liquid climbed more than 50% compared to the same period last year. Airwick and Finish continued to grow strongly, with consumers continuing to spend more time at home compared to a year ago, the company said. Edited October 20, 2020 by Bud the Baker Quote
antrin Posted October 20, 2020 Report Posted October 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Bud the Baker said: Well it looks like I called this one wrong back in the spring - I thought we'd have a bit of a baby boom! I dunno... Maybe there was a lot more bareback riding going on and that might still cause a population explosion. What does a business who wants to sell condoms do? Publicise that you don't NEED to wear condoms - you're safe if you're wearing a mask? I am not convinced by R+B's claim: "During the spring lockdown Reckitt saw a sharp drop in demand for condoms as people had less sex." Quote
Bud the Baker Posted October 20, 2020 Report Posted October 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, antrin said: I dunno... Maybe there was a lot more bareback riding going on and that might still cause a population explosion. What does a business who wants to sell condoms do? Publicise that you don't NEED to wear condoms - you're safe if you're wearing a mask? I am not convinced by R+B's claim: "During the spring lockdown Reckitt saw a sharp drop in demand for condoms as people had less sex." So are we waiting till next Jan/Feb? Quote
Bud the Baker Posted October 20, 2020 Report Posted October 20, 2020 14 minutes ago, antrin said: I'm not waiting... ...to find out or to do more shagging? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.