Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
St.Ricky

Referee Statistics Andrew Dallas and others 2019

Recommended Posts


On 2/3/2019 at 9:26 AM, chalky1 said:

Anyone who makes mistakes like that in their line of work would get a bollicking from their manager, told to buck or they're out the door.

They were not mistakes.  Dallas meant every one, real penalty or not.  He was biased. 

He never gave the late one that actually was a penalty, as he did not want the distinction of holding the world record.  That would bring far too much scrutiny from folk outside this biased/scared wee bubble called Scotland on him and his standside linesman, as to why the actual feck fouls in the outfield, turned into penalties.  The spotlight would also have been turned on the corrupt SFA for not taking action on certain officials and players. As it is, abroad this is a curious wee story about funny wee Scotland.

After a couple of years of Referees actually not giving The Rangers International decisions they probably should have, since Gerrard took over and started moaning about Refs, 'some' are reverting to 'type' or are scared of reprisals.

Shhhhhhhhhhh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Wendy Saintss said:

The rule with regards to fouls is that if a foul starts outside the box and then continues into the box then a penalty should be given.

This, however, is in relation to one player fouling another. I haven't been able to find any clarification if its the same principle for handball.

IMO, it probably is and therefore it probably was a penalty.

But, also IMO, he puts his hands up to protect his face. The ball would have struck his head if he hadn't put his hands up. So not deliberate handball? The deliberate handball area is very murky IMO.

Surely the offence is committed once the initial contact has taken place ?Whether hand ball or foul.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Surely the offence is committed once the initial contact has taken place ?Whether hand ball or foul.  

 

Read dirty sanchez’s quote for a better explanation.

 

There was a change recently such that if the foul begins outside the box and continues into the box then it’s a penalty.

 

So something along the lines of playing advantage to the last minute.

 

But it doesn’t apply to handball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, St.Ricky said:

It appears that Mr Dallas is not taking any of the cup games coming up.

When you say appears, are you trying to cheer us all up by making a factual statement or just by getting our hopes up ?   :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, St.Ricky said:

Not taking charge at any games. A background role. 

He's effectively being backed by the beaks and kept out of the limelight. He should have been drawn over the coals and demoted to level 4 or below such has been his performances.

Edited by stlucifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Dirty Sanchez said:

He's the 4th official for Hamilton v St Johnstone tomorrow and Aberdeen v QoS on Sunday.

It doesn't bode well for that match - imagine him judging whether a referee got something correct? Even worse if one of the other 3 takes ill - will he step in . . .

Should not be refereeing at our level full stop  . . . :hatman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said:

It doesn't bode well for that match - imagine him judging whether a referee got something correct? Even worse if one of the other 3 takes ill - will he step in . . .

Should not be refereeing at our level full stop  . . . :hatman

He's already won a watch with no-one being Cited from the game against us.  Hiding him away as a fourth official just buys some more time.  Disgraceful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:

He's already won a watch with no-one being Cited from the game against us.  Hiding him away as a fourth official just buys some more time.  Disgraceful. 

Aye. And as for that, WTF is insufficient evidence when it comes to watching something from 1000 different angles in slow motion and close up? And it's very convenient that Defoe's incident is being highlighted while Candeias' dive into the box is left in the closet. The whole thing stinks of cover up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stlucifer said:

Aye. And as for that, WTF is insufficient evidence when it comes to watching something from 1000 different angles in slow motion and close up? And it's very convenient that Defoe's incident is being highlighted while Candeias' dive into the box is left in the closet. The whole thing stinks of cover up.

Who am I to disagree? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, munoz said:

Or shot.

Oh dear expect an SFA statement about death threats soon.

BTW was it Dallas that to quote the SFA "saw and deemed no foul"  a stamp on someones arm, An elbow in the face and "cupping balls" during the last ugly sister pantomime?

(I know off topic)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't bode well for that match - imagine him judging whether a referee got something correct? Even worse if one of the other 3 takes ill - will he step in . . .
Should not be refereeing at our level full stop  . . . :hatman


On the contrary, Sevco aren’t involved so he’ll probably be okay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...