Jump to content

shull

Big Boris, Our Prime Minister

Recommended Posts


31 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

During the vote it was made very clear that we'd be out of the EU. No customs union, nothing. Nobody in charge of the Leave side was talking about remaining in that customs union as far as I can remember.

Couldn't care less what Farage said, did or wanted. He wasn't in charge of anything then and he's not in charge now.

I've addressed the £350m thing before. Workers rights and environmental policies will now be crafted in the UK although will almost certainly be aligned with those of the EU for trade reasons. Nobody on the Leave side is talking about removing or reducing any of these rights so I'm not with you on that.

I have no idea exactly what the EU offered originally and/or whether it compares exactly with what Johnson has agreed to now and neither do the rest of us.

The threat of a backdoor no deal is always going to be on unless this all gets sorted out but at least both sides are now talking the same game.

Leaving the Single Market & the 4 Freedom's - Goods, People, Services & Capital - the focus during the referendum was people which makes NFs poster totally relevant. The Customs Union was not mentioned frequently (see below).

https://fullfact.org/europe/what-was-promised-about-customs-union-referendum/

Perhaps you could reiterate what you said about the "£350M thing" as I missed it, I'm glad you're sanguine about Worker's Rights & Environmental policies in the case of a Tory government lead by BJ with members of Britannia Unchained in senior Cabinet positions. I'm not.

Quote

Or, indeed, Johnson himself, who declared that “the weight of employment regulation is now back-breaking”, singling out “the collective redundancies directive, the atypical workers’ directive, the working time directive and a thousand more”.

Quote

Around the same time that Beecroft delivered his report, Raab authored a pamphlet asserting that UK employment legislation represents a “straitjacket” for the economy. And like Beecroft, Raab proposed allowing employers to fire at will.

For the sake of the unemployed, he implored the government to “urgently reduce the burdens of employment regulations”.

As for no-one knowing "exactly" what they were it is clear that a border down the Irish Sea was proposed by the EU and rejected by TM in the summer of 2017, when BJ was Foreign Secretery  - the current deal could have been reached 2 years ago if the Tory Party had wanted it.

Quote

A post-Brexit border in the Irish sea was never really on the table – but a political solution must be

July 31, 2017 2.15pm BST

FFS man - it's barely two years!

Edited by Bud the Baker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct! 
The SNP MPs at Westminster have stopped England and Wales from leaving!
You’re pretty dumb!
#thichasfcuk turns up late to the party again. Thankfully the schools are back next week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bud the Baker said:

I'm glad you're sanguine about Worker's Rights & Environmental policies in the case of a Tory government lead by BJ with members of Britannia Unchained in senior Cabinet positions. I'm not.

 

Now now. Play nice. Don't put words in my mouth. You're not talking to an idiot. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, oaksoft said:

Now now. Play nice. Don't put words in my mouth. You're not talking to an idiot. :D

You said….

Quote

Nobody on the Leave side is talking about removing or reducing any of these rights so I'm not with you on that.

As I then pointed out the PM has advocated removing these rights in a speech, the Foreign Secretary also as part of the Britannia Unchained manifesto, the Home Secretay Priti Patel was a co-author of BU and went further last year when she suggested the UK use the threat of food shortages to pressure the RoI in Brexit negotiations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bud the Baker said:

You said….

As I then pointed out the PM has advocated removing these rights in a speech, the Foreign Secretary also as part of the Britannia Unchained manifesto, the Home Secretay Priti Patel was a co-author of BU and went further last year when she suggested the UK use the threat of food shortages to pressure the RoI in Brexit negotiations.

Stop deflecting.

You wrongly accused me of being sanguine about workers rights being eroded.

Cut it out. It's completely unnecessary.

Edited by oaksoft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As predicted Bercrow - he say no!

Quote

Bercow refuses to allow 'meaningful vote' on Brexit deal today

“My ruling is that the motion will not be debated today as it would be repetitive and disorderly to do so,” he told MPs.

It was an amendment to the Bill that was defeated on Saturday, BJs letter has gone to the EU and various Conservative MPs had indicated their intention to vote for the Bill today - I would've considered the circumstances to be different.

 

Edited by Bud the Baker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/19/2019 at 9:21 AM, oaksoft said:

The point is that we didn't vote as 4 separate countries so your logical argument is completely invalid.

We voted as the UK. That's not semantics or a matter of opinion. It is a matter of solid fact. We are not yet an independent country.

It is certainly interesting that the voters in Scotland were resoundingly pro-Remain but in the context of a UK vote it is meaningless to make the argument you are making.

The point is we didn't vote as four separate countries; we are four separate countries, So in effect we did vote as four separate countries.

 

The separateness of N Ireland is recognized in the deal; why not recognize Scotland separateness 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/19/2019 at 9:21 AM, oaksoft said:

The point is that we didn't vote as 4 separate countries so your logical argument is completely invalid.

We voted as the UK. That's not semantics or a matter of opinion. It is a matter of solid fact. We are not yet an independent country.

It is certainly interesting that the voters in Scotland were resoundingly pro-Remain but in the context of a UK vote it is meaningless to make the argument you are making.

This is irrelevant in the sense that we did not get a choice on voting as a nation. The UK parties are constantly inferring that we are equal partners in their union so, if that were true, we SHOULD HAVE been allowed to vote as a nation. So the referendum ended all square. Status quo should have been the outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bud the Baker said:

As predicted Bercrow - he say no!

It was an amendment to the Bill that was defeated on Saturday, BJs letter has gone to the EU and various Conservative MPs had indicated their intention to vote for the Bill today - I would've considered the circumstances to be different.

 

Parliament decreed that the Brexit bill details had to be declared and debated before the DEAL, (not bill), could be voted on. This is effectively the repeat of the debate and vote.

ETA. The DEAL was a general overview of what the EU and BoJo's cronies had agreed. The bill is a far more involved document.

Edited by stlucifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, stlucifer said:

This is irrelevant in the sense that we did not get a choice on voting as a nation. The UK parties are constantly inferring that we are equal partners in their union so, if that were true, we SHOULD HAVE been allowed to vote as a nation. So the referendum ended all square. Status quo should have been the outcome.

It's entirely relevant.

If Scots had wanted to make our own decision regarding EU membership as a  separate country we would have voted for Independence in 2014. We didn't and therefore accepted that our voice would be a UK voice come the EU referendum.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, oaksoft said:

It's entirely relevant.

If Scots had wanted to make our own decision regarding EU membership as a  separate country we would have voted for Independence in 2014. We didn't and therefore accepted that our voice would be a UK voice come the EU referendum.

 

 

That’s not the case though.

In 2014 there was no EU referendum on the cards - simply the promise that “Voting No is the only way to stay in the EU.” The EU referendum debate only came when Cameron shat himself from losing voters to UKIP in 2015. By then we had already voted No and expected the promise about staying in the EU to hold.

Some Scots made their EU decision in 2014 due to being told leaving the UK meant being out of the EU. There was no plans for an overall EU referendum at that point and that’s where the relevance is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Cornwall_Saint said:

That’s not the case though.

In 2014 there was no EU referendum on the cards - simply the promise that “Voting No is the only way to stay in the EU.” The EU referendum debate only came when Cameron shat himself from losing voters to UKIP in 2015. By then we had already voted No and expected the promise about staying in the EU to hold.

Some Scots made their EU decision in 2014 due to being told leaving the UK meant being out of the EU. There was no plans for an overall EU referendum at that point and that’s where the relevance is.

I cant recall the exact date when the EU referendum was called but we knew it would be 2016 well before the 2014 Indyref. 

I think it was announced in 2012 or 2013 but it might have been earlier.

One of the arguments against that argument about being out of the EU was that we might vote Leav in 2016 and be out as part of the UK wothdrawal anyway.

You've got your dates wrong CS.

Edited by oaksoft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

I cant recall the exact date when the EU referendum was called but we knew it would be 2016 well before the 2014 Indyref.

I think it was announced in 2012 or 2013 but it might have been earlier.

I’m pretty sure it was an election promise Cameron made in 2015 to stave off the increasing threat of UKIP. 
 

I’ve just checked it up and it appears we are both right in a sense. There’s an article here dating back to 2013 where Cameron made the promise during PMQs on the basis they won the 2015 election. This referendum was dependent on winning the 2015 election though - had, say Labour come out on top, the referendum would never have been held as Miliband outright said he was against it.

You are right in the sense Cameron mentioned it in 2013, but the actual “sorting it out” was dependent on the 2015 election, which was after the Scottish referendum. So, I would say I’m not wrong in saying that in 2014, there was no immediate plan for an EU referendum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Cornwall_Saint said:

I’m pretty sure it was an election promise Cameron made in 2015 to stave off the increasing threat of UKIP. 
 

I’ve just checked it up and it appears we are both right in a sense. There’s an article here dating back to 2013 where Cameron made the promise during PMQs on the basis they won the 2015 election. This referendum was dependent on winning the 2015 election though - had, say Labour come out on top, the referendum would never have been held as Miliband outright said he was against it.

You are right in the sense Cameron mentioned it in 2013, but the actual “sorting it out” was dependent on the 2015 election, which was after the Scottish referendum. So, I would say I’m not wrong in saying that in 2014, there was no immediate plan for an EU referendum.

Yeah you are right about the requirement for a 2015 GE win but in fairness not a single person truly believed Labour were going to win that election. They were miles behind in the polls and despite drastically outperforming in the 2015 election were still absolutely miles away from winning in the end. It was a real shock that they denied the Tories a clear win. Interestingly, we'd have probably been out of the EU by now if the Tories had taken another few seats and got their increased majority. I don't remember any arguments about how an EU referendum would be avoided if Labour got in. It was being talked about as an inevitable Remain win (I remember being annoyed at that complacency) but that was it.

It was crystal clear to everyone that the Tories would win in 2015, that there would then be an EU referendum in 2016 and that there was a risk of Leave winning. People voted in 2014 with that risk in mind.

So I accept you have a small point here but there's a fair bit of straw clutching going on. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

Yeah you are right about the requirement for a 2015 GE win but in fairness not a single person truly believed Labour were going to win that election. They were miles behind in the polls and despite drastically outperforming in the 2015 election were still absolutely miles away from winning in the end. It was a real shock that they denied the Tories a clear win. Interestingly, we'd have probably been out of the EU by now if the Tories had taken another few seats and got their increased majority. I don't remember any arguments about how an EU referendum would be avoided if Labour got in. It was being talked about as an inevitable Remain win (I remember being annoyed at that complacency) but that was it.

It was crystal clear to everyone that the Tories would win in 2015, that there would then be an EU referendum in 2016 and that there was a risk of Leave winning. People voted in 2014 with that risk in mind.

So I accept you have a small point here but there's a fair bit of straw clutching going on. :D

The Tories may have been expected to take the most seats but the majority perhaps wasn’t to be expected, meaning that a coalition partner would still have had to agree on the EU referendum proposal. I wouldn’t quite say it was clear as day that a EU referendum would be held soon after 2014. Either way, the Scots were still promised that the only way of guaranteeing EU membership was to stay in the UK, which has proven to be bollocks now.

It’s my belief that the main reason the Tories won a majority was down to the EU referendum promise by Cameron - otherwise UKIP would have picked up further votes, either taking seats themselves or splitting the vote enough to get others in ahead of the Tories. It was mentioned in 2013 but was more in the public eye during the 2015 campaign (as is all manifesto policies).

That being said, there was also the “comfort” of many thinking Leave would never win the referendum anyway, meaning that some of them weren’t worried about this vote happening because they believed Remain would always come out on top. Of course they’ve been proven wrong now, but at the time it was a mere promise thinking it would end the issue and debate about EU membership - a massive reason Cameron bolted for it when Leave won, as he realised he had f**ked up massively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said:

I don't recall hearing anything about an EU referendum before the 2014 IndyRef. I think if an EU referendum had been a definite (or near definite) then it would have been brought up by the Yes side as a counter argument against the "only way to stay in the EU is to vote No" claim.

I have to agree with this. While I posted above about an article from 2013 with the original mention of an EU referendum, it wasn’t really at the forefront of anything until the 2015 election campaign (the point I was trying to make), and indeed as you say, would have been the obvious counter to “Stay in UK to stay in EU.” It was not mentioned on a wide scale prior to Indyref.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...