bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, oaksoft said: The f**k it is. It's the pair of you yet again. Is it an illness with you? Nope, again I think it’s the only thing keeping BAWA interesting. Is it an illness for you not being able to ignore it? He’s going mental with the responses, this is on him today. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 3 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: A whole load of deflection that totally failed to answer the only question asked! True to form Baz. True to form. 1 minute ago, BuddieinEK said: How can I be upset whilst laughing so hard at your nonsensical nonsense? You seem upset to me... Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 You seem upset to me...But you are almost always wrong! This is a great example.Don't worry though.I'm laughing AT you... not with you.Again... Deflection so you don't have to answer the question you have already avoided answering!Poor form Baz. Poor form. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 24 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: But you are almost always wrong! This is a great example. Don't worry though. I'm laughing AT you... not with you. Again... Deflection so you don't have to answer the question you have already avoided answering! Poor form Baz. Poor form. Na that’s not right I’m afraid. You do seem pretty upset at still not being able to back up your claims. Why don’t you come back to me when you can show deflection? That way we’ll save the vein on Oak’s head from getting anymore agro Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 Na that’s not right I’m afraid. You do seem pretty upset at still not being able to back up your claims. Why don’t you come back to me when you can show deflection? That way we’ll save the vein on Oak’s head from getting anymore agro [emoji38]Yet again more deflection...Still avoiding answering the question asked.True to form. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 8 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: Yet again more deflection... Still avoiding answering the question asked. True to form. Had a wee scroll back & if there’s a question I’ve been asked that I haven’t answered, I have missed it... what question are you referring to? Or will we see another BEK deflection here? Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 Had a wee scroll back & if there’s a question I’ve been asked that I haven’t answered, I have missed it... what question are you referring to? Or will we see another BEK deflection here? Priceless!Avoid answering by deflection!So so typical Baz. True to form.Had you answered the question in the first place rather than deflecting, you wouldn't be in such a tizz![emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 1 minute ago, BuddieinEK said: Priceless! Avoid answering by deflection! So so typical Baz. True to form. Had you answered the question in the first place rather than deflecting, you wouldn't be in such a tizz! So I admit I have missed the 'question' if it indeed exists but instead of telling me what it is, you claim I have deflected? Spin for all to see, too easy yet again BEK. Better luck next time. Quote
Bud the Baker Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, bazil85 said: And you can go back as far as you like, you won’t find me lying... I already have done - on this page! ! You obviously think you're very clever and dancing rings round the rest of us intellectually but the man on the Greenhill Road Omnibus thinks otherwise. Edited July 29, 2019 by Bud the Baker Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 1 minute ago, Bud the Baker said: I already have done - on this page! ! You obviously think you're very clever and dancing rings round the rest of us intellectually but the man on the Greenhill Road Omnibus thinks otherwise. You haven’t & I very clearly showed you where it was complete nonsense to say that was a lie. It’s always the same, I ask for proof, people fail to provide it. Take from that what you will. More irony in people having a go at me for continuing to go back & forth on posts. Dragging up previous arguments that I have given my opinion (and only my opinion) on. Can’t help it if my opinion is based in facts like GLS having access to our accounts & your opinion isn’t. Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 So I admit I have missed the 'question' if it indeed exists but instead of telling me what it is, you claim I have deflected? Spin for all to see, too easy yet again BEK. Better luck next time. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Priceless.You avoid answering a question by deflection.You deflect further.You play dumb to the question.You then deflect even further by accusing spin.Priceless.[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 You haven’t & I very clearly showed you where it was complete nonsense to say that was a lie. It’s always the same, I ask for proof, people fail to provide it. Take from that what you will. More irony in people having a go at me for continuing to go back & forth on posts. Dragging up previous arguments that I have given my opinion (and only my opinion) on. Can’t help it if my opinion is based in facts like GLS having access to our accounts & your opinion isn’t. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Your opinion is based on facts but nobody elses is![emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Quote
Bud the Baker Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, bazil85 said: You haven’t & I very clearly showed you where it was complete nonsense to say that was a lie. It’s always the same, I ask for proof, people fail to provide it. Take from that what you will. More irony in people having a go at me for continuing to go back & forth on posts. Dragging up previous arguments that I have given my opinion (and only my opinion) on. Can’t help it if my opinion is based in facts like GLS having access to our accounts & your opinion isn’t. As I've already said GLS will be doing well if he can bury the "10% of player budget statement" when the Financial Results are published in November/December! His spin and your shameless sycophancy will be apparent - Time Is On My Side... Edited July 29, 2019 by Bud the Baker Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: Priceless. You avoid answering a question by deflection. You deflect further. You play dumb to the question. You then deflect even further by accusing spin. Priceless. More spin, good effort but still an ultimate fail to show any lies or deflection. Maybe next time. 3 minutes ago, BuddieinEK said: Your opinion is based on facts but nobody elses is! Sorry do you deny our chairman has full access to the accounts? If you want to let me know the ‘facts’ people are using to claim GLS is lying about the income the arrangement made, fill your boots. Again it’s still my opinion i’m not saying he 100% categorically is telling the truth. Quote
waldorf34 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 Any chance of getting back on subject, if not ,someone close this down! Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 1 minute ago, Bud the Baker said: As I've already said GLS will be doing well if he can bury the "10% of player budget statement" when the figures Financial Results are published in November/December! His spin and your shameless sycophancy will be apparent - Time Is On My Side... My opinion is he’s likely telling the truth based on his situation, still an opinion. If it turns out he’s not my ‘opinion’ would be wrong. You seem to be claiming he is wrong though are you not? My opinion is also we’ll be lucky to get much out the accounts based on the way they’ll be published. I doubt they would separate out the arrangement. Quote
pod Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, waldorf34 said: Any chance of getting back on subject, if not ,someone close this down! More chance of us finishing in top 4. Quote
pod Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, bazil85 said: My opinion is he’s likely telling the truth based on his situation, still an opinion. If it turns out he’s not my ‘opinion’ would be wrong. You seem to be claiming he is wrong though are you not? My opinion is also we’ll be lucky to get much out the accounts based on the way they’ll be published. I doubt they would separate out the arrangement. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, waldorf34 said: Any chance of getting back on subject, if not ,someone close this down! The vultures seem to come in and target me more & more. Obsession to show where I’ve lied from what I can tell... always seems to go back to the two stand deal for some reason. Quote
waldorf34 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, bazil85 said: My opinion is he’s likely telling the truth based on his situation, still an opinion. If it turns out he’s not my ‘opinion’ would be wrong. You seem to be claiming he is wrong though are you not? My opinion is also we’ll be lucky to get much out the accounts based on the way they’ll be published. I doubt they would separate out the arrangement. The only way we can see how theclub is progressing or not is to have a breakdown of the accounts. Smisa can furnish us with this as they have access to the figures. ie along the lines of costs/expenditure for this season and the last season with %increases and decreases for the following headings Income from gates, hospitality,player sales,Spfl,SFa ,sponsors Expenditure from players salaries,admin ,salaries,agents costs ,directors expenses. Seeing this type of accounts should answer a lot of supporters questions and assist Smisa going forward. Quote
pod Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, bazil85 said: The vultures seem to come in and target me more & more. Obsession to show where I’ve lied from what I can tell... always seems to go back to the two stand deal for some reason. Can the two of you not stand off. Don't think there's going to be any winners. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, waldorf34 said: The only way we can see how theclub is progressing or not is to have a breakdown of the accounts. Smisa can furnish us with this as they have access to the figures. ie along the lines of costs/expenditure for this season and the last season with %increases and decreases for the following headings Income from gates, hospitality,player sales,Spfl,SFa ,sponsors Expenditure from players salaries,admin ,salaries,agents costs ,directors expenses. Seeing this type of accounts should answer a lot of supporters questions and assist Smisa going forward. They could but I imagine they would need GLS agreement to do so (either legally or from a conduct perspective) persoanlly I don’t think it’s needed, I choose to believe our chairman. Some don’t but it’s the same ones for which he can do no right. There choice. I think people need to let it go, it’s done & it ain’t changing until we increase our home crowds/ decide after inheriting the club. Quote
bazil85 Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 7 minutes ago, pod said: Can the two of you not stand off. Don't think there's going to be any winners. I can’t really go anywhere on the forum now without someone following me in a desperate attempt to show some sort of lie/ deflection. Yep I know I don’t need to respond but I choose to. Quote
DLBud Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 FFS guys, give it a rest. You don’t agree, we all get it but does it need 10 pages of back and forth to establish that?Just f**king agree to disagree and move on. Quote
BuddieinEK Posted July 29, 2019 Report Posted July 29, 2019 Sorry do you deny our chairman has full access to the accounts? If you want to let me know the ‘facts’ people are using to claim GLS is lying about the income the arrangement made, fill your boots. Again it’s still my opinion i’m not saying he 100% categorically is telling the truth. So question now long forgotten and replaced by meaningless deflection. True to form.Gonnae answer my question?It wasn't even a trick one. [emoji23] Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.