Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said:

It's actually 66.4573% for Harry.  FFS man get a grip, do you know nothing? :)

The  shorthand used to remember the percentage of Gary Mack appearances  more accurately is , 68.27%,  the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively. In mathematical notation, these facts can be expressed as follows, where X is an observation from a normally distributed random variable  μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is its standard deviation:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}
 
 
HOPE THAT CLEARS THINGS UP

Posted
Call me naive if you like but I still think the official club statement of his injury is plausible enough not to doubt there maybe more to it. I'd just like to know what information anyone has to back up this rumour. There is speculation and there is speculation - mental health just isn't something I think people should be speculating about especially when we have an official statement stating exactly where Gary is injury wise. Bottom line is we will be a better team when he is back fully fit and playing.

I agree with your sentiments. However, if there were any mental health issues and I'm of the opinion that there aren't, I just don't believe that the club would make an announcement. Anyway, the most important matter is getting him back to full fitness along with Davis, who happily seems to have turned the corner, which will please the majority of the people that follow the club.
Posted

One stat that is clear is that we've had just 4 clean sheets in 16 games this season. We've outscored teams so far, but won't always be able to so tightening up at the back is a must, by whatever means possible.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said:

It's actually 66.4573% for Harry.  FFS man get a grip, do you know nothing? :)

This man is an island- which means that I am a continuous mass of land surrounded by water apparently. Yup that kinda of sums up my rounds of golf:D

Posted
Just now, Slartibartfast said:

No, you weren't told that you were an island, you were told that you looked like an island due to the size of the puddle of your own pish you were standing in. :)

Naw I stand well clear of the lampposts these days

Posted
36 minutes ago, East Lothian Saint said:

The  shorthand used to remember the percentage of Gary Mack appearances  more accurately is , 68.27%,  the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively. In mathematical notation, these facts can be expressed as follows, where X is an observation from a normally distributed random variable  μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is its standard deviation:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}
 
 
HOPE THAT CLEARS THINGS UP

Image result for longest math equation with answerBollocks East ur 0.03% out FFS

Posted
Just now, Slartibartfast said:

Ever since you got your tongue stuck to one one winter when you were a kid?

You always have to have the last WORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORDWORD

Posted
17 minutes ago, shull said:

Thankfully, I am indulging in superfast skimming in this Topic today. 

Dire 

Here's an original thought Shull- Start a thread- Think one of the extras in Hawaii Five 0 died this month

Posted
15 minutes ago, ReturnOf isma is god said:

I can tell yous how to make a calculator say boobies 

 

What do you do for the e ? A 6 or a 3 ? 

It works better for just 80085 .

Posted
9 hours ago, East Lothian Saint said:

The  shorthand used to remember the percentage of Gary Mack appearances  more accurately is , 68.27%,  the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively. In mathematical notation, these facts can be expressed as follows, where X is an observation from a normally distributed random variable  μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is its standard deviation:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(\mu -\;\,\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +\;\,\sigma )&\approx 0.6827\\\Pr(\mu -2\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +2\sigma )&\approx 0.9545\\\Pr(\mu -3\sigma \leq X\leq \mu +3\sigma )&\approx 0.9973\end{aligned}}}
 
 
HOPE THAT CLEARS THINGS UP

Did you actually type that in Latex?  :lol:

This forum is finally starting to show signs of a bit of intelligence. :lol:

Posted

 

5 hours ago, ReturnOf isma is god said:

I can tell yous how to make a calculator say boobies 

 

 

6 hours ago, shull said:

Thankfully, I am indulging in superfast skimming in this Topic today. 

Dire 

Didn't take long for the Bawheid Brothers to turn up and ruin the mood. <_<

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:

You do know that all of this is just going to attract Oaky, don't you?

In fairness it's what PROPER scientists and engineers know inside out.

Fake "engineers" like Faraway who change lightbulbs, connect pipes together, install machines or replace a broken valve probably won't have a fecking clue what they are looking at. Those people would be correctly called Technicians. At least they would refer to themselves as technicians if they had any sense of self awareness or basic professional decency.

I have an "engineer" coming to replace my boiler next week. I will wait until he has finished before I correct him on his fake job title.

Edited by oaksoft
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

In fairness it's what PROPER scientists and engineers know inside out.

Fake "engineers" like Faraway who change lightbulbs, connect pipes together, install machines or replace a broken valve probably won't have a fecking clue what they are looking at. Those people would be correctly called Technicians. At least they would refer to themselves as technicians if they had any sense of self awareness or basic professional decency.

I have an "engineer" coming to replace my boiler next week. I will wait until he has finished before I correct him on his fake job title.

I teach engineering, you teach us all that you're a twat.

I have t admit, you're better at that than me. :lol:

PS You're attitude to the people who do the type of jobs above also proves you are a pompous cnut with little, or no, real friends, and that's no surprise. <_< 

Edited by faraway saint
Posted
12 minutes ago, faraway saint said:

I teach engineering, you teach us all that you're a twat.

I have t admit, you're better at that than me. :lol:

PS You're attitude to the people who do the type of jobs above also proves you are a pompous cnut with little, or no, real friends, and that's no surprise. <_< 

Well I think we can all agree that a nerve has been beautifully plucked here.

Thanks for playing. :lol:

Posted
9 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

Well I think we can all agree that a nerve has been beautifully plucked here.

Thanks for playing. :lol:

That's what all twats say.............................nice attempt. :lol:

I see snake liked your post, maybe he will be your pal, he's missing tantrum to hide behind. :rolleyes:

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

In fairness it's what PROPER scientists and engineers know inside out.

Fake "engineers" like Faraway who change lightbulbs, connect pipes together, install machines or replace a broken valve probably won't have a fecking clue what they are looking at. Those people would be correctly called Technicians. At least they would refer to themselves as technicians if they had any sense of self awareness or basic professional decency.

I have an "engineer" coming to replace my boiler next week. I will wait until he has finished before I correct him on his fake job title.

Are you the  real Sheldon Cooper?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...