Jump to content

Recommended Posts


1 minute ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

How can that be when they’ve decided positions on points per game?

Why does that change anything ?

The principle is totally wrong full stop.

As it stands its impossible to get this solved, there might be legal challenges on financial loss but otherwise its done. 

Wonder what the view would have been on here if we hadn't beaten Hearts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lenziebud said:

Why does that change anything ?

The principle is totally wrong full stop.

As it stands its impossible to get this solved, there might be legal challenges on financial loss but otherwise its done. 

Wonder what the view would have been on here if we hadn't beaten Hearts

Well I haven’t worked it out (coz I can’t be arsed), but I’d have thought if they’d played a game less and were only a point behind, their points per game would be better. Forgive me if I’m mistaken. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

Well I haven’t worked it out (coz I can’t be arsed), but I’d have thought if they’d played a game less and were only a point behind, their points per game would be better. Forgive me if I’m mistaken. 

Just checked and they’d still have gone down by 0.002 of a goal.

So I was talking shite. No’ like me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, lenziebud said:

Why. 

Thistle have played a game less than the team one point above them ?

 

1 hour ago, Cookie Monster said:

2 points. emoji6.png

Thistle have 26 points from 27 games, QotS have 28 points from 28 games therefore QotS have more points per game than Partick. 1 point per game as opposed to 0.96 per game. ETA. this would translate to Partick having 26.96 points from 28 games.

Edited by stlucifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TPAFKA Jersey 2 said:

Well I haven’t worked it out (coz I can’t be arsed), but I’d have thought if they’d played a game less and were only a point behind, their points per game would be better. Forgive me if I’m mistaken. 

If they were only 1 point behind they would be relegated on goal difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, stlucifer said:

 

Thistle have 26 points from 27 games, QotS have 28 points from 28 games therefore QotS have more points per game than Partick. 1 point per game as opposed to 0.96 per game. ETA. this would translate to Partick having 26.96 points from 28 games.

So if St Mirren were in the same position as Thistle are currently then you would come on here and write that ?

The principle of Partick Thistle being relegated stinks and if people can get over the vested interest in Hearts going down to then that stinks also.

Its an utter embarrassment from start to finish of self interest, financial greed and just a basic lack of  interest in doing what is right. 

St Mirren board are part of it and now they want to sell season tickets without any idea of how or when football is going to be played next season.

Edited by lenziebud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, lenziebud said:

So if St Mirren were in the same position as Thistle are currently then you would come on here and write that ?

The principle of Partick Thistle being relegated stinks and if people can get over the vested interest in Hearts going down to then that stinks also.

Its an utter embarrassment from start to finish of self interest, financial greed and just a basic lack of  interest in doing what is right. 

St Mirren board are part of it and now they want to sell season tickets without any idea of how or when football is going to be played next season.

What are you whittering on about? I was explaining the logic used. It's not MY logic. There will have to be something in place. I am not in control of any of it. Pull your horns in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

Behave. 

Exactly.

Almost as if he wants to be a Hearts fan.:lol:

The reprehensible behaviour of Anne Budge far outweighs the behaviour of anyone else in this saga, except of course for the idiot blue bigots.

Edited by FTOF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, FTOF said:

Exactly.

Almost as if he wants to be a Hearts fan.:lol:

The reprehensible behaviour of Anne Budge far outweighs the behaviour of anyone else in this saga, except of course for the idiot blue bigots.

Thistle been treat ok in your view ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, lenziebud said:

Thistle been treat ok in your view ?

What do you think the Hearts board would have done if they had been sitting in eleventh place ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, munoz said:

What do you think the Hearts board would have done if they had been sitting in eleventh place ?

Yep so I guess its all ok then. Rats in a sack all of them. 

The damage done to Scottish football with all of this is huge.

Its actually funny people putting the OF out as the ugly sisters, as when push comes to shove they are all equally capable of being the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, lenziebud said:

Yep so I guess its all ok then. Rats in a sack all of them. 

The damage done to Scottish football with all of this is huge.

Its actually funny people putting the OF out as the ugly sisters, as when push comes to shove they are all equally capable of being the same.

I assume you are not renewing your ST then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...