Greenhill Road Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 I think Pinochet may have been there as well. Well we know Pinocchio ???? was there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 18 minutes ago, TediousTom said: As a non smisa member this really is none of my business. As a nosey bugger however I am somewhat interested. I refuse to go into the sin bin to read his mutterings (the forum really is a better place without him urinating all over it) so can someone please post a succinct report on what his actual grievance is? Can someone confirm that the grievance/complaint has actually been made? May I also plead with my fellow forum user's...please do not go into the sin bin ond converse with this sinner. He is a needy individual who craves attention. If we starve him of that attention he may in time drift off to annoy someother online community like say mumsnet or something! Exactly. He's a horrible individual and this is clearly designed as an attention seeking plot now that 90% of us who endured his pish no longer choose to do so now that we don't have to filter through it. To that end, it's been done to get more eyes on him. I've always said his MO is to be the tail that wags the dog and his behaviour in doing stuff like this and publicising it simply reinforces that opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 I don't really have a problem with this, other than the fact that if he was really serious about whatever this is about he could have done it without broadcasting it to all and sundry. If SMiSA have genuinely done something wrong, then it needs to be corrected. If they haven't, and I suspect this is the case, then Dickson looks like a fool. Win/Win in my book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 (edited) 41 minutes ago, TediousTom said: As a non smisa member this really is none of my business. As a nosey bugger however I am somewhat interested. I refuse to go into the sin bin to read his mutterings (the forum really is a better place without him urinating all over it) so can someone please post a succinct report on what his actual grievance is? Can someone confirm that the grievance/complaint has actually been made? May I also plead with my fellow forum user's...please do not go into the sin bin ond converse with this sinner. He is a needy individual who craves attention. If we starve him of that attention he may in time drift off to annoy someother online community like say mumsnet or something! What if that online community is The Samaritans , do you not think they have enough problems Edited January 31, 2017 by linwood buddie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 He has just admitted that the FCA responded to him that they won't be investigating this because this is not how they operate. They have re-directed him to Supporters Direct. How embarassing for him. You'd have thought he would have taken the time to check how the FCA works before making grand announcements about putting SMISA to the sword via a complaint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted January 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 (edited) I'm sure he'll keep us up to speed on Supporters Direct's response. Of course, in making this post here, he'll accuse me of being a coward unwilling to engage directly with him, yet if I post in the Wank Tank, he'll tell me I cannot keep away from him and the Wank Tank is the star attraction of the forum. I see another accusation is not posting under your real name. FFS. pozbaird - Paul Baird. He's a brammer right enough. Edited January 31, 2017 by pozbaird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rea Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 hour ago, oaksoft said: He has just admitted that the FCA responded to him that they won't be investigating this because this is not how they operate. They have re-directed him to Supporters Direct. How embarassing for him. You'd have thought he would have taken the time to check how the FCA works before making grand announcements about putting SMISA to the sword via a complaint. I could have told him that,,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidg Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Regardless of what anyone thinks of him I kinda think it's a bit shite that we've created an area to talk about him and he can't respond. Not a fan of this sin bin carry on if I'm being honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby_F Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Dr Zeus's story about the little boy who craved love and attention - but perversely did everything he could to drive everyone away... The Wank in the Tank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 23 minutes ago, davidg said: Regardless of what anyone thinks of him I kinda think it's a bit shite that we've created an area to talk about him and he can't respond. Not a fan of this sin bin carry on if I'm being honest. Why not start a pole? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, Bud the Baker said: Why not start a pole? I thought since Brexit we couldnae hire them? Is that no what BoJo said..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted January 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 hour ago, rea said: I could have told him that,,,, How are Supporters Direct likely to respond? Any idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rea Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 minute ago, pozbaird said: How are Supporters Direct likely to respond? Any idea? It would be improper to say anything as i have an ongoing responsibility with SD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bud the Baker Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, rea said: It would be improper to say anything as i have an ongoing responsibility with SD Which SD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rea Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, Bud the Baker said: Which SD? there is only one Supporters Direct, as the not very well known song goes. SDS is a Scottish operation of SD, it is SDS i do stuff with as they are up here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 minute ago, rea said: there is only one Supporters Direct, as the not very well known song goes. SDS is a Scottish operation of SD, it is SDS i do stuff with as they are up here Er, SD as in Stuart Dickson.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted January 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, rea said: It would be improper to say anything as i have an ongoing responsibility with SD Ach, live a little. Gie's a clue... are the letters 'GTF' involved? If so, just cough twice. I've watched 'All The President's Men' again recently, I know how this works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 42 minutes ago, davidg said: Regardless of what anyone thinks of him I kinda think it's a bit shite that we've created an area to talk about him and he can't respond. Not a fan of this sin bin carry on if I'm being honest. They can respond over in the looper colony, and, if anyone is daft enough, s/he can drop over to offer their contribution. See, its all good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdowell76 Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 an outsider looking in would probably conclude that THIS thread is the wank tank. with the op being the main wanker! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Regardless of what anyone thinks of him I kinda think it's a bit shite that we've created an area to talk about him and he can't respond. Not a fan of this sin bin carry on if I'm being honest. You can go and talk to him if you like mate.You know where he is.Free country and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 5 minutes ago, mcdowell76 said: with the op being the main wanker! Reported! Personal abuse. IN THE BIN! IN THE BIN! IN THE BIN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kombibuddie Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 hours ago, rea said: I could have told him that,,,, I think you did. I can't remember which thread but you said something like 'they'll do nothing' (or words to that effect). I think it may have been in the SMISA forum when you were discussing the asset lock. 4 hours ago, div said: I don't really have a problem with this, other than the fact that if he was really serious about whatever this is about he could have done it without broadcasting it to all and sundry. If SMiSA have genuinely done something wrong, then it needs to be corrected. If they haven't, and I suspect this is the case, then Dickson looks like a fool. Win/Win in my book. I hope he is wrong too as I have put faith in SMISA by signing up to Buy the Buds but, the derision aimed his way is something for you as website owner to think about, manage & stop. If you don't want him on the site, tell him to do one. What happens if he is right? (& I sincerely hope he is not) and SMISA have taken a course of action they should not have? I suppose that is one for discussion once an outcome from Supporters Direct is known. Stuart, sorry bud, personally, I hope you have got it completely wrong with regards to SMISA & the asset lock. However, SMISA have not done themselves any favours by failing to engage the questions on the SMISA forum they indicate is for that purpose. All this could have been avoided IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdowell76 Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, Drew said: Reported! Personal abuse. IN THE BIN! IN THE BIN! IN THE BIN! if the criteria for the bin was abuse then you and pbaird would have been the first into the bin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 16 minutes ago, mcdowell76 said: if the criteria for the bin was abuse then you and pbaird would have been the first into the bin Happy for that one to be tested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted January 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 I'm being called a wanker, a coward, and the leader of a sooper dooper clique of pozzy's. Clearly, it's all about me. They can't stay away, I'm the star attraction here.... etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.