stlucifer Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 I think he is still restricted to owning less than 10% of the shares of the club which means he can't become the majority shareholder and owner. At the moment King and also the 3 Bears have more shares than him. That may be but they don't have a stranglehold on it. More fun to be had methinks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaldyOzBud Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Criiiiiiiiiiinge I cannot find this word in my Funk and Wagnalls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibardfast Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Criiiiiiiiiiinge[/quote This is why you are a tool mate. Hope I didn't make a typo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Criiiiiiiiiiinge[/quote This is why you are a tool mate. Hope I didn't make a typo. Is Oaky in freefall or is it a monthly thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted March 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 (edited) Back to the dead club, does the one off fine clear the way for Ashley to Buy the club? He has no need or wish to buy it, it seems. He just needs it to meander aimlessly on, selling shirts etc to loyal eedjits. He already has surety over Murray Park and registered trademarks. He will continue to profit whatever happens at the EGM. Or he could pull the plug on his loans. We all wait to see what King and Co will offer in terms of a plan and the £ to back it. He initially spoke of £32m, came to Scotland and it adjusted to £16m, then it turns out that was £8m from him and £8m from the fans. What will it be on Saturday? It is this not-knowing that baffles me. How can the The Rangers Loyal put faith in a man who was complicit in the tenures of both Murray and Whyte, and who has not revealed what plans he has for the future nor how he will fund this amazing loss-making enterprise. (Not even going into all the South African naughtiness) That small fine was for Ashley. The club faces the SFA with regard to the same business on March 16. Maybe Mr King's wealth off-the-radar can easily cover any fines from his place atop the marble staircase. He'll need it. Edited March 4, 2015 by bluto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted March 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Is it "'cause he's a guid Ranjurs man"?That shows you have as much understanding of the situation as oaksoft.No. It's cos he's a Real Ranjurs Man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaldyOzBud Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 That shows you have as much understanding of the situation as oaksoft. No. It's cos he's a Real Ranjurs Man. Do Real Ranjurs play in the same Liga as Atletico Partick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Llambias and Leach not moving. The board will have prior knowledge of the proxy outcomes, so them not jumping ship suggests. The vote for Easdale and Sommers would have been out The vote for Leach and Llambias is in. The vote for King is out The vote for Murrey and Gilligan Who cares they are make weights. Or King is in Murrey and Gillgan out in which case Leach and Llambias can vote king of the board. Supposition but there you have it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Is it "'cause he's a guid Ranjurs man"? If by a guid Ranjurs man you mean a thief a crook and liar then yes Just like the google eyed freak and chuckles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 He has no need or wish to buy it, it seems. He just needs it to meander aimlessly on, selling shirts etc to loyal eedjits. He already has surety over Murray Park and registered trademarks. He will continue to profit whatever happens at the EGM. Or he could pull the plug on his loans. We all wait to see what King and Co will offer in terms of a plan and the £ to back it. He initially spoke of £32m, came to Scotland and it adjusted to £16m, then it turns out that was £8m from him and £8m from the fans. What will it be on Saturday? It is this not-knowing that baffles me. How can the The Rangers Loyal put faith in a man who was complicit in the tenures of both Murray and Whyte, and who has not revealed what plans he has for the future nor how he will fund this amazing loss-making enterprise. (Not even going into all the South African naughtiness) That small fine was for Ashley. The club faces the SFA with regard to the same business on March 16. Maybe Mr King's wealth off-the-radar can easily cover any fines from his place atop the marble staircase. He'll need it. Could not agree with this more! King would be a disaster for the new club in so many ways. Sadly does not look like happening. Instead its just a soft porn arse job from Ashley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaldyOzBud Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 And Deportivo La Kilmarnock? And San Mirren? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 No, I meant an orange tinted bigot. Well that too obviously Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 I think he is still restricted to owning less than 10% of the shares of the club which means he can't become the majority shareholder and owner. At the moment King and also the 3 Bears have more shares than him. restricted by who the SFA does not run the stock market and their de facto intervention in the ownership of a PLC could result in them getting sued for a lot more than Ashley's fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 You're a bit behind the times mate but, just for you ... Bugger that's my playlist out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Paris Saint Johnstone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 This is why you are a tool mate. Hope I didn't make a typo. You stuck to small words, thus improving your chances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted March 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 You stuck to small words, thus improving your chances. And you, yours! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmonbuddie Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 And you, yours! And you! Must be communicable....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambiebud Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Is it just me or is this 7500 fine a bit odd? A one of penalty for a continual breach of the rules. Just as he's been fined pocket change doesn't mean his dual interest has changed? Surely this should be a rolling punishment until his dual ownership stops? Remember SMFC were fined £30K for not having enough under 20s on the bench in a cup tie? £7500 for undue influence to Ashley. Priorities eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted March 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 And you! Must be communicable....... Ooooh. Slippery as a slippy thing... I knew some (salm) Buddie would get me on that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qarsaan Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Remember SMFC were fined £30K for not having enough under 20s on the bench in a cup tie? £7500 for undue influence to Ashley. Priorities eh? Yes, it kinda puts things into perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 restricted by who the SFA does not run the stock market and their de facto intervention in the ownership of a PLC could result in them getting sued for a lot more than Ashley's fine. I doubt it, the SFA can't stop anyone buying shares in anything What they can do is restrict access to membership and competitions to clubs that don't conform to SFA standards. Since a club of some sorts called rangers was a member when these terms were set then I don't see how they can launch an action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 I doubt it, the SFA can't stop anyone buying shares in anything What they can do is restrict access to membership and competitions to clubs that don't conform to SFA standards. Since a club of some sorts called rangers was a member when these terms were set then I don't see how they can launch an action. It would not be rangers launching the action Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Llambias and Leach not moving. The board will have prior knowledge of the proxy outcomes, so them not jumping ship suggests. The vote for Easdale and Sommers would have been out The vote for Leach and Llambias is in. The vote for King is out The vote for Murrey and Gilligan Who cares they are make weights. Or King is in Murrey and Gillgan out in which case Leach and Llambias can vote king of the board. Supposition but there you have it. Ahem! First shot to Ashley. Expect admin to come very quickly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 It would not be rangers launching the action who would launch an action then, maybe i missed something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.