buddiecat Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 7 hours ago, Callum Gilhooley said: Sense of humour bypass worked then i see. Don't know, did it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 On 8/5/2017 at 8:01 PM, davidg said: Your time is appropriated. I just feel that the hurdles of getting this going aren't that difficult to overcome and should a kid be hit on the back of the head as he walks up the stairs to take his seat, possibly cracking his skull on the sharp concrete steps we'll look back and say that that was totally avoidable. I would definitely say that installing this is a "reasonably practicable" measure. sorted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidg Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 14 minutes ago, beyond our ken said: Sorted. Sorted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 If i may be allowed to post something BEFORE its jumped on by the "Waiting to be/pro-active" offended brigade. why dont the club put up a set of practise goals at either end of the stadium in front of an open corner area? that way there would be a lot less people in the firing line for stray shots, the integrity of the goalmouths would be maintained and a greater cost/effort potentially avoided. Corners either side of the West stand would keep it away from the panda club too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted August 10, 2017 Report Share Posted August 10, 2017 Put them in front of the away fans, especially the unwashed. Who gives a monkeys whether THEY get smacked by a ball? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Put them in front of the away fans, especially the unwashed. Who gives a monkeys whether THEY get smacked by a ball? Away fans more likely to complain and sue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted September 4, 2017 Report Share Posted September 4, 2017 Re. The Smisa September update that dropped into everyone's mailbox today/last night. the survey within the update paints a subtle, interesting positioning strategy by the Smisa committee. Like the initial survey over a year ago that was used to determine the type of thing members may like to see put forward for a vote on the £2 pot, this survey seeks to illicit if members want to see the pot spent on either club issues or community issues. it appears that this will influence what is put to the vote, and given the outcome of votes thus far it is reasonable to assume the likelyhood is the winning vote will be for a spend on the club. Even though in the last round of votes over 60% of those voting chose options other than just the club. what it means is the 'first past the post' system of deciding the spend will see community projects overlooked, even though a majority may have chosen a selection of them. If this is how it is going to be it runs contrary to all the communications, promotion, discussion during BTB where it was explicitly stated time and again that the community as a whole would benefit from the £2 pot as well as club related things. if that is the case, and despite votes cast in the majority for community projects being dropped as no one singular project beat the first past the post vote, it would seem reasonable to accommodate Smisa members who dont then see the point in contributing to the £2 pot as the eventual spend never reflects their vote, or indeed one of their reasons for signing up go BTB...? looks like a game-changer here, if the community side is effectively dropped then members have the right to opt out of funding the £2 pot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melmac Posted September 4, 2017 Report Share Posted September 4, 2017 As subtle as a Punggye-ri bottom burp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted September 17, 2017 Report Share Posted September 17, 2017 I vote the next three monthly spend is set aside to pay the SFA fine we're almost certain to get for indiscipline come the end of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted September 17, 2017 Report Share Posted September 17, 2017 The guilty players should pay the upcoming SFA fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 Re. The Smisa September update that dropped into everyone's mailbox today/last night. the survey within the update paints a subtle, interesting positioning strategy by the Smisa committee. Like the initial survey over a year ago that was used to determine the type of thing members may like to see put forward for a vote on the £2 pot, this survey seeks to illicit if members want to see the pot spent on either club issues or community issues. it appears that this will influence what is put to the vote, and given the outcome of votes thus far it is reasonable to assume the likelyhood is the winning vote will be for a spend on the club. Even though in the last round of votes over 60% of those voting chose options other than just the club. what it means is the 'first past the post' system of deciding the spend will see community projects overlooked, even though a majority may have chosen a selection of them. If this is how it is going to be it runs contrary to all the communications, promotion, discussion during BTB where it was explicitly stated time and again that the community as a whole would benefit from the £2 pot as well as club related things. if that is the case, and despite votes cast in the majority for community projects being dropped as no one singular project beat the first past the post vote, it would seem reasonable to accommodate Smisa members who dont then see the point in contributing to the £2 pot as the eventual spend never reflects their vote, or indeed one of their reasons for signing up go BTB...? looks like a game-changer here, if the community side is effectively dropped then members have the right to opt out of funding the £2 pot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gc_SMFC Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 Bit of a bump to this thread.I hope Smisa are willing to put funds towards the ladies team without the need for a vote. I hope the men's teams are also contributing to them as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 (edited) What about a load of "The Baw Didnae Burst 17/19 Championees " t-shirts for all the members Edited January 13, 2018 by linwood buddie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linwood buddie Posted January 14, 2018 Report Share Posted January 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, cockles1987 said: Let's make sure of 17/18 first before thinking of consecutive titles Im just going by what Fitzy has prophesied , so i meant it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 14, 2018 Report Share Posted January 14, 2018 Sports Scientist continuation, Women's Team, and family entertainment pre-match. Seems pretty reasonable to me this time round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 On 13/01/2018 at 10:53 PM, gc_SMFC said: Bit of a bump to this thread. I hope Smisa are willing to put funds towards the ladies team without the need for a vote. I hope the men's teams are also contributing to them as well. If SMISA are putting their own raised funds to the ladies team that’s fine by me without a vote but I think they’re doing it right in regards to three month spend. No aspect of that money should be spent without a vote IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 All three are good. http://www.smisa.net/news-archive/5-general-smisa-news/240-january-2-spend-options Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 31 minutes ago, shull said: All three are good. http://www.smisa.net/news-archive/5-general-smisa-news/240-january-2-spend-options Get yourself signed back up, you know it makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 How do you know I haven't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 1 hour ago, shull said: How do you know I haven't Good point well made... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st jock Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 If SMISA vote against the funding for the ladies team, what happens? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 16, 2018 Report Share Posted January 16, 2018 10 hours ago, st jock said: If SMISA vote against the funding for the ladies team, what happens? The money is saved like the excess money would be saved this quarter. It will either be able to form part of another option short-term, long-term or put to the buyout cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st jock Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 The money is saved like the excess money would be saved this quarter. It will either be able to form part of another option short-term, long-term or put to the buyout cost. Meant what would happen to the ladies team as it seems that they are counting on it!?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazil85 Posted January 21, 2018 Report Share Posted January 21, 2018 12 hours ago, st jock said: On 1/16/2018 at 9:53 AM, bazil85 said: The money is saved like the excess money would be saved this quarter. It will either be able to form part of another option short-term, long-term or put to the buyout cost. Meant what would happen to the ladies team as it seems that they are counting on it!?? I don't think they're counting on it too be honest. They will be able to raise funds through a number of means. Pretty sure it'll pass anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted January 24, 2018 Report Share Posted January 24, 2018 THE RESULTS ARE IN ......... http://www.smisa.net/news-archive/5-general-smisa-news/241-january-2-pot-vote-results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.