bluto Posted April 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 (edited) Given that bluto has got you down as nothing short of the Lord Jesus, I'll gather the disciples and the 5000, you bring the barrel of water, fish and bread. I apologise for beng needlessly petty when I earlier alluded that you had no idea what 'friendship' might entail. I now realise I was sadly accurate. And also that you're unlikely to gain many on here. Poor you. Edited April 2, 2013 by bluto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 So, was the point of quoting the 'Hamas' charter supposed to indicate that ALL Palestinians are terrorists? What bollox. Hamas don't represent ALL Palestinians, no more than the Green Brigade represent ALL C*ltic fans. Every 'population' have their share of exstremists, nutjobs, and so on. We have plenty of them within our own ranks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budweiser Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 (edited) Palestine is not a Race. Israel is not a race. No Racism here! Just you spouting your usual 'I am so much more superioir than yaww" shite. Free BAWA from the thoroughly dislikeable Oaksof and... STOP THE WEST BANK OCCUPATION! STOP THE WEST BANK OCCUPATION! STOP THE WEST BANK OCCUPATION! Race is a classification system used to categorise humans into large and distinct populations or groups by anatomical, cultural, ethnic, genetic, geographical, historical, linguistic, religious, or social affiliation. Therefore your ill informed opinion that those from Palestine and Israel are not part of a race is frankly ludicrous defence of this individual. Edited April 2, 2013 by Budweiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desnold Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 Race is a classification system used to categorise humans into large and distinct populations or groups by anatomical, cultural, ethnic, genetic, geographical, historical, linguistic, religious, or social affiliation. Therefore your ill informed opinion that those from Palestine and Israel are not part of a race is frankly ludicrous defence of this individual. Budweiser, Vambo was not saying Palestine and Israel were not part of a race. What he/she was saying was that they are not in themselves a race hence comments made against them were not necessarily racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 In my defence (M' Lud) I was not expecting this to appear DSS.jpg I was expecting his missus Mrs DSS.jpg Damn... Next season's actual home kit leaked onto the internet after a few false alarms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted April 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 Budweiser, Vambo was not saying Palestine and Israel were not part of a race. What he/she was saying was that they are not in themselves a race hence comments made against them were not necessarily racist. Indeed. In fact, Vambo mentioned Palestine and Israel - two nations. And nationality is not mentioned in Budweiser's cut and paste "Race classification and categorisation". Yawn.... sorry.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st jock Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 what a boring thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 what a boring thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TPAFKATS Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 As Joe 7169 (?) pointed out on page 1(?) of the thread this is all part of a campaign by Bhigot incorporated to deflect attention away from the behavior of their fans whilst promoting a myth that they are victims of hate crimes from other teams supporters. If its any consolation to DSS I believe that out of those charged under the new legislation, only 1 poss 2 have been found guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray street Posted April 3, 2013 Report Share Posted April 3, 2013 I chased Bluto out of another discussion on the subject because he refused to discuss the root of the whole thing and had no answer to hard fact. Painful reading your post but I got there in the end and provided edited highlights above. Do us a favour and chase him out of this one as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsden buddie Posted April 3, 2013 Report Share Posted April 3, 2013 In my defence (M' Lud) I was not expecting this to appearDSS.jpg I was expecting his missusMrs DSS.jpg I notice the bloke has more downloads than the female, what does that tell you about our forum users. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Hughes in BlueSuedeShoes Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 I apologise for beng needlessly petty when I earlier alluded that you had no idea what 'friendship' might entail. I now realise I was sadly accurate. And also that you're unlikely to gain many on here. Poor you. Yoo spelld thiss wurd rong sew yoo ar nawt pety atall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddiecat Posted April 5, 2013 Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 when is the free plasticine available, i've promised the grandkids i'll get some for them, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isle Of Bute Saint Posted April 5, 2013 Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 Only ever had one warning on here thanks to being reported for what I thought was something inoffensive on a Palestinian debate in general nonsense started by none other than DSS and reported by DSS. As they say what goes around comes around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E=Mc2 Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Hopefully the YouTube link below works. I am posting this only to highlight, and pose the question, how a police force can react so differently to what to me seems another occasion when individuals shout "Free Palestine" at a football match. Could the difference be answered by the fact that their is no Cetic security personal advising the police officers at This game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 Hopefully the YouTube link below works. I am posting this only to highlight, and pose the question, how a police force can react so differently to what to me seems another occasion when individuals shout "Free Palestine" at a football match. Could the difference be answered by the fact that their is no Cetic security personal advising the police officers at This game? I love the fact that you are still trying to convince us this was a political thing. Seriously - zipped right up the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E=Mc2 Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 I love the fact that you are still trying to convince us this was a political thing. Seriously - zipped right up the back. What do you think it was? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 What do you think it was? Bigoted Sectarian nonsense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 What do you think it was? Seems like a reasonable question, Oaky. Who was in the wrong here? We know it couldn't be you because you've never been wrong. Give us the benefit of your second degree wisdom or whatever the f**k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reborn saint Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 Seems like a reasonable question, Oaky. Who was in the wrong here? We know it couldn't be you because you've never been wrong. Give us the benefit of your second degree wisdom or whatever the f**k. To be fair he was wrong once........Put a constant in when it was not needed and failed to be hailed as discovering the expansion of the Universe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E=Mc2 Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 As I understand it DSS has been charged under the "Offensive behaviour at football and threatening communications (Scotland) Act 2012" which received Royal Assent on 19th January 2012.. I would just like an answer to why the Police allowed the protest and the chants heard on the You Tube clip taken at Tynecastle on 16th June 2012? I am not looking for a debate on the rights or wrongs of what DSS did. That is for the Procurator Fiscal to a make decision on how they wish to proceed. If you look at the You Tube video below then there seems to be a vast gulf between the way the Edinburgh police interpret this law and how the Paisley police interpret the same law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civilsaint Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 Notwithstanding any personal opinions, you make an extremely valid point from an entirely legalistic point of view. I look forward to hearin ghow this one pans out. Please do keep us updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reborn saint Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 As I understand it DSS has been charged under the "Offensive behaviour at football and threatening communications (Scotland) Act 2012" which received Royal Assent on 19th January 2012.. I would just like an answer to why the Police allowed the protest and the chants heard on the You Tube clip taken at Tynecastle on 16th June 2012? I am not looking for a debate on the rights or wrongs of what DSS did. That is for the Procurator Fiscal to a make decision on how they wish to proceed. If you look at the You Tube video below then there seems to be a vast gulf between the way the Edinburgh police interpret this law and how the Paisley police interpret the same law. I think we will hear the word "Mince" for only the second time in a court of law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibbles old paperboy Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 Maybe get Hugh Kerr MSP involved since he was keen to speak up on behalf of Celtic fans in the Scottish Parliament a few weeks ago, I'm sure as a Paisley MSP he'll be glad to help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oaksoft Posted April 8, 2013 Report Share Posted April 8, 2013 As I understand it DSS has been charged under the "Offensive behaviour at football and threatening communications (Scotland) Act 2012" which received Royal Assent on 19th January 2012.. I would just like an answer to why the Police allowed the protest and the chants heard on the You Tube clip taken at Tynecastle on 16th June 2012? I am not looking for a debate on the rights or wrongs of what DSS did. That is for the Procurator Fiscal to a make decision on how they wish to proceed. If you look at the You Tube video below then there seems to be a vast gulf between the way the Edinburgh police interpret this law and how the Paisley police interpret the same law. Are you seriously not intelligent enough to spot the vast chasm of difference between the two incidents? Maybe DSS will be found guilty and maybe he'll be let off. Either way, you trying to paint the two scenarios as the same thing amounts to you trying to treat us like idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.