HSS Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Doncaster just been on the radio saying there is no case to answer as sevco have done all they can to put a stop to the songs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whydowebother Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Doncaster just been on the radio saying there is no case to answer as sevco have done all they can to put a stop to the songs. Ah well , business as usual then. It's astonishing the spfl don't have the balls to deal with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambiebud Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 It's astonishing the spfl don't have the balls to deal with this. Really? It's not as if they have a history of bending over, shorts down, to both the dead club and it's bastardised replacement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whydowebother Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 It's astonishing the spfl don't have the balls to deal with this. Really? It's not as if they have a history of bending over, shorts down, to both the dead club and it's bastardised replacement I take your point , perhaps I should of said it 'should' be Astonishing but sadly I guess as you highlight its predictable. It is stunning this man is running/ruining (delete as appropriate ) our game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted February 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Ah well , business as usual then. It's astonishing the spfl don't have the balls to deal with this. It's not astonishing. The SPFL only does what its member clubs want them to do. Whatever the SPFL does - or as in this case DOESN'T do - then St Mirren has been a participant in the decision-making, in choosing not to act or to pretend that it is powerless. Shame to think that St Mirren is happy with the bigotry but that is the reality. Edited February 24, 2015 by bluto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSS Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 James Easdale had resigned from the Board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickMcD Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 James Easdale had resigned from the Board. He might be a dishonest twat but is he the worst involved in the whole shitfest? I doubt it. Maybe he's now the only one with a bit of decency. Or have I taken that too far? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted February 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 In context, you're right. As a director of RIFC it does SEEM that unlike so many others he has not been diverting funds into his own pockets. His brother is still chair of the subsidiary company, TRFC. It's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Even after an EGM it looks like Cap'n Ashley will steer straight ahead, ignoring the King icebergs. Have you heard about the plan for a manager called Carver...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnextlifetime Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 In context, you're right. As a director of RIFC it does SEEM that unlike so many others he has not been diverting funds into his own pockets. His brother is still chair of the subsidiary company, TRFC. It's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Even after an EGM it looks like Cap'n Ashley will steer straight ahead, ignoring the King icebergs. Have you heard about the plan for a manager called Carver...? Naw , but that rhymes with Sarver. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 He might be a dishonest twat but is he the worst involved in the whole shitfest? I doubt it. Maybe he's now the only one with a bit of decency. Or have I taken that too far? nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 In context, you're right. As a director of RIFC it does SEEM that unlike so many others he has not been diverting funds into his own pockets. His brother is still chair of the subsidiary company, TRFC. It's like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Even after an EGM it looks like Cap'n Ashley will steer straight ahead, ignoring the King icebergs. Have you heard about the plan for a manager called Carver...? King as chair man opens a whole can of worms. Brilliant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Is he a wanker? I think so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted February 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) Is it tomorrow is wages day? Who'll provide the Wonga? The expensive, re-re-located EGM is primarily to remove a named Easdalefrom RIFC Board... But he's gone. Kinda pointless, now. Ashley could also move in two fresh names to replace his other named (by King for firing) appointees and so the EGM would then be utterly pointless. Yet still waste more money.... Will Ashley not pay up this time? Will King etc win (what?) at the EGM? Can anyone other than Ashley afford this charade. When will his patience run out? Like many others, even I'm getting bored with it drag, dragging on. Luckily the SFA are closely monitoring it all, so the good name of Scottish Football remains unsullied. Still... This will be an interesting 7 days.... Edited February 26, 2015 by bluto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 Turkeys voting for chhristmas! The only question is if they will go bust before or after the EGM and wither King or Ashley get to control the administration Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/rangers-fans-to-lobby-first-minister-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-***.119510897 The wee treasures ............ Edited February 27, 2015 by shull Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted February 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 Turkeys voting for chhristmas! The only question is if they will go bust before or after the EGM and wither King or Ashley get to control the administration The Wither King.It fits. I really like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluto Posted February 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/rangers-fans-to-lobby-first-minister-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-***.119510897 The wee treasures ............ A great deployment of their energies and passions. I mean... There's no other dark clouds on their horizon, are there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gosport Buddie Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/rangers-fans-to-lobby-first-minister-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-***.119510897 The wee treasures ............ Does this mean my books will have to be renamed "Attilla, The Nasty Man from the ancient warmongering tribe from Asia ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo57 Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) If the **** are campaigning to have the term '***' banned, that means it is not yet banned... EXCEPT on this forum. Why? BTW, they claim *** is a derogotary term for a Protestant.... first I've heard of it... is it no a The Rangers Fan, no matter their religion? Edited February 27, 2015 by Vambo57 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insaintee Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/rangers-fans-to-lobby-first-minister-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-***.119510897 The wee treasures ............ Interesting bit at the end about Collymore's online petition where do we sign up for that? How about here https://www.change.org/p/all-good-people-boycott-sponsors?just_created_and_shared=true Edited February 27, 2015 by insaintee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Pityme Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) If the **** are campaigning to have the term '***' banned, that means it is not yet banned... EXCEPT on this forum. Why? BTW, they claim *** is a derogotary term for a Protestant.... first I've heard of it... is it no a The Rangers Fan, no matter their religion? Is it still ok tae call them 'Blue-Nose, Knuckle-Dragging Bastards"?If for some fanciful reason it ever was made illegal to call them '****' we would just have to call them 'Still' instead. Because they would 'Still' be '****'..! Edited February 27, 2015 by Lord Pityme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 I'm a Protestant. I've never been called a H u n in my life. That's because it's a term non-Rangers fans use to describe Rangers. Fcuk all to do with Protestants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddiecat Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) They cant ban the word Hun they would need to arrest all the guys who wrote stories about the war in comics Edited February 27, 2015 by buddiecat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 And what would come after 99? One dred? & what is going to happen when gary plays Greece in the euro qualifiers ? Thats a bit unfair ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTOF Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 I'm a Protestant. I've never been called a H u n in my life. That's because it's a term non-Rangers fans use to describe Rangers. Fcuk all to do with Protestants. A very different experience from myself. In one of the denominational educational establishments that I worked in several years ago, the aforementioned term was often directed at myself, despite them knowing that I was a season ticket holder at SMP. I wasn't bothered by it, as every time they used it, it made me think just how pathetic a life someone must lead in order to have that type of bigoted outlook on life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.