Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
14 minutes ago, elvis said:

I dont do twitter  but can someone ask our former chairman if it is 100%  a 33% sell on. Now I was at the meeting the night he said that but a Hibs fan insists it's a lot less than that he said Peatrie told him this so someone's telling porkies. 

Erm, it's a game Hibs fans play to wind us up. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:

We would have to wait if the second option was chosen. 

So we wouldn't get all of our share up front either. 

We shouldn't under any circumstance be looking to blow the best part of £1m quid in the space of a year  -  so it should make no difference whether we get paid up front or in installments.  (unless of course Villa go bust)  

Even if we did want to blow the £1m before we get our hands on it,  the club could always ask SMISA to front it from the £2 pots and all the ring-fenced money. :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Posted
29 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:

Let's say you are MD at Hibs. Simple example. 

One club offers you 3 million up front. 

A other offers you 3.2 million with 50 per cent now and 50 per cent after 12 months. 

Which would you accept?

Even from a St mirren & Hibs perspective it would be that one. This time next year we would have more money and would be due 1/3 of the 50% if he did get sold. Not that either offer is on the table. Most sources are quoting £2.75m 

Posted
Brendan near to tears over this. Celtic matching rather than bettering the Villa offer looks desperate. Go to Villa John. Either way, well done Hibs for standing up to that shower at Parkhead.

Totally agree with you, Celtic think they can just step in & take other Scottish clubs best players, well hopefully not this time. Feck off Celtic & hope yous get gubbed tonight lol
Posted
8 minutes ago, wabuddy said:

Reported fee 2.1 M

ttps://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/john-mcginn-aston-villa-celtic-15005260

 

Can't see it being that low. 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, wabuddy said:

Reported fee 2.1 M

ttps://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/john-mcginn-aston-villa-celtic-15005260

 

 

5 minutes ago, munoz said:

Can't see it being that low. 

 

Yep,  I agree. 

Surely got to be up around £2.5m - £2.75m mark.  

Only way I can see anything as low as £2.1m getting accepted is if there's a big sell on % built in. 

Edited by Maboza
Posted
4 minutes ago, Buddie Marvelous said:
Stewart Gilmour @StewartGilmour1
FollowFollow @StewartGilmour1
More

Believe John McGinn deal to Villa done, what a bargain when Windass is worth 1.2M!!! John will be a huge success down in England, great attitude and marvellous talent. Bloody nose for Celtic in this one.

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/SPFL/St+Mirren

2:13 AM - 8 Aug 2018 from Troon, Scotland

Did he tweet that before or after the one where he reported that the Titanic had gone down?:P

Posted
31 minutes ago, bazil85 said:

Even from a St mirren & Hibs perspective it would be that one. This time next year we would have more money and would be due 1/3 of the 50% if he did get sold. Not that either offer is on the table. Most sources are quoting £2.75m 

 

Except there is no 50% sell on in the second example...

Posted

Looks like the McGinn deal to Hibs with Saints receiving 33% of any transfer is a great gamble and it's gonna pay of big time. Think a lot of credit should go to the former board Gilmour. Campbell and McAusland. Think we should have this clause in all our young players contracts.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, santaponsasaint said:

Looks like the McGinn deal to Hibs with Saints receiving 33% of any transfer is a great gamble and it's gonna pay of big time. Think a lot of credit should go to the former board Gilmour. Campbell and McAusland. Think we should have this clause in all our young players contracts.

 

 

And more importantly- Davie Longwell. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, wabuddy said:

Reported fee 2.1 M

ttps://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/john-mcginn-aston-villa-celtic-15005260

 

I think this paper bought into people online speculating that Villa only offered 100k more. Fake news. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, wabuddy said:

Agree 2.1m seems a bit low  but then again that other lot were looking for usual bargain

Probably a sell on attached to that...

Posted
1 hour ago, Bud the Baker said:

Erm, it's a game Hibs fans play to wind us up. 

Yes I know about that game but this was a guy who sounded genuine in his believes. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, elvis said:

Yes I know about that game but this was a guy who sounded genuine in his believes. 

I heard that if he leaves Hibs of his own volition before his 24th birthday, then we get hee-haw AND we have to pay back 33% of the £100,000 we got for him :(

Posted
I heard that if he leaves Hibs of his own volition before his 24th birthday, then we get hee-haw AND we have to pay back 33% of the £100,000 we got for him [emoji20]


I heard that we actually have to pay Hibs 33% of all future transfer fees we receive.
Posted
6 minutes ago, Wendy Saintss said:
17 minutes ago, AllyM said:
I heard that if he leaves Hibs of his own volition before his 24th birthday, then we get hee-haw AND we have to pay back 33% of the £100,000 we got for him emoji20.png

 


I heard that we actually have to pay Hibs 33% of all future transfer fees we receive.

 

Methinks you two need to go back and stay in the Wendy house until you are better :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...