stlucifer Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 I also thought if the referee saw the offence and acted on it then that was that. As happened with Morelos in the Celtic game, IF the referee says he saw it and Didn't act on it because he felt it unnecessary, then that was that. Or are they really having the audacity to say what Morelos did THRICE wasn't as bad as Tansey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Sanchez Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 I take it this paragraph explains the length of the Morelos ban. 4 Sending-Off Offences –Additional Suspension 4.1 Where a player is reported for a sending off offence, and that player has also been Determined by a Tribunal to have committed an additional sending off offence in the same match , or has previously been reported for a sending-off offence in the same Competition in a Season, an additional suspension of one match for each previous sending-off offence will be applied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 1 hour ago, scrappy coco said: Why would Sutton hate us because of his brother, that's just being silly.. We're no different from any other team in the league, it was a poor tackle and should have been a red card.. Your beginning to sound like a Sevconian.... better than sounding like a pratt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delpierro Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 He deserves a suspension, as to, Paul Mcginn on Cammy Smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 Red card all day long . Don’t know why we’re wasting time (and money ?) contesting it . Take the ban . Move on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russian Saint Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 Tansey didn’t go in to hurt the Hearts player and I said at the time it looked as though he tried to pull out of the tackle. I haven’t had the luxury of reviewing it over and over, and at the time neither did the ref.I believe these compliance officers (or officer) can easily be swayed by media influence, and that to me is wrong. The ref seen it, booked him and that should be the end of it. What next, reviewing controversial goals, penalties awarded that have had a major influence on the outcome of a game and being overturned days later? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 1 hour ago, delpierro said: He deserves a suspension, as to, Paul Mcginn on Cammy Smith. How is Greenock tonight. Foggy ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougJamie Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 15 minutes ago, Callum Gilhooley said: Red card all day long . Don’t know why we’re wasting time (and money ?) contesting it . Take the ban . Move on Thanks Callum. Close the thread please Div Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 27, 2019 Report Share Posted February 27, 2019 32 minutes ago, DougJamie said: Thanks Callum. Close the thread please Div I’ll bet you 37p the Compliance officer decides red card - two match ban . Then we can close the thread . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 11 hours ago, Callum Gilhooley said: I’ll bet you 37p the Compliance officer decides red card - two match ban . Then we can close the thread . She doesn't make the decision, the referee panel does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattman Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 Red all day long unfortunately. Club probably have appealed due to the shambles decisions the compliance board have already made this season... seems to be guesswork majority of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gc_SMFC Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 It was a clear red card and worth a suspension.No idea why we are appealing it, but with the way the panels worked this season I've no idea.I like a good trial by sportscene. Players should get penalised for being reckless and for professional fouls, especially if the correct action hasn't been taken on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWISAINT71 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 We need him against these " fully professional thugs " on Saturday. Is there way we can appeal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, Callum Gilhooley said: I’ll bet you 37p the Compliance officer decides red card - two match ban . Then we can close the thread . FFS. Whether you think it was a red or not is immaterial. IT WAS A YELLOW. For once the stupid f**kin SFA rules might have worked in our favour and you want us to bend over and take a 2 match ban right up the arse. The rule is the ref saw it and punished it as a yellow. End of case. If they issue a ban now it will make a mockery of the rules. f**k this high moral ground shite just because you think he “deserved” a red. Edited February 28, 2019 by TPAFKA Jersey 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 She doesn't make the decision, the referee panel does.Thank you for that . My 37p bet still stands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callum Gilhooley Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 FFS. Whether you think it was a red or not is immaterial. IT WAS A YELLOW. For once the stupid f**kin SFA rules might have worked in our favour and you want us to bend over and take a 2 match ban right up the arse. The rule is the ref saw it and punished it as a yellow. End of case. If they issue a ban now it will make a mockery of the rules. f**k this high moral ground shite just because you think he “deserved” a red.Sorry for having an opinion. I’ll consult with you before posting in future. Oh , as for “the ref saw it , it’s a yellow, END OF CASE ?” In case you missed it .....Naw it isnae !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAFKA Jersey 2 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Callum Gilhooley said: Sorry for having an opinion. I’ll consult with you before posting in future. Oh , as for “the ref saw it , it’s a yellow, END OF CASE ?” In case you missed it .....Naw it isnae !! I love it when folk deem a differing opinion as a denial of their own. Anyway, I’m not stating an opinion I’m stating a fact based on the rules. Your guess is as good as mine as to why there is even a case to answer here. You’re usually a decent poster on here. Get off your moral high horse Other teams benefit from these rules all the time. Why should we be the moral guardians of what is a red and what isn’t. Oh, and on reflection my previous post may have been a tad outbursty. Edited February 28, 2019 by TPAFKA Jersey 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guinness Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 No - one answering why it would be a two match ban rather than one if he had been sent off. Player punished because spfl rule the referee was wrong. Seems odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scam75 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 No further action for Harry Kane in the EPL as the referee saw it and dealt with it at the time. Surely that is also the case here? SFA are bumbling idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 24 minutes ago, scam75 said: No further action for Harry Kane in the EPL as the referee saw it and dealt with it at the time. Surely that is also the case here? SFA are bumbling idiots. SFA are bumbling idiots. - this is just one of the issues with them . . . If we were Sevco we would get away with the 1st 3 or 4 of these . . . but we are not. Still hope we get away with this though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antrin Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said: If we were Sevco we would get away with the 1st 3 or 4 of these . . . but we are not. Still hope we get away with this though! Logically... this could be interpreted as you concealing a secret desire to be a sevco person. Tut! Edited February 28, 2019 by antrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turrabuddie Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 SFA are bumbling idiots. - this is just one of the issues with them . . .If we were Sevco we would get away with the 1st 3 or 4 of these . . . but we are not. Still hope we get away with this though! When is the hearing ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper07 Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 13 minutes ago, turrabuddie said: 51 minutes ago, Sweeper07 said: SFA are bumbling idiots. - this is just one of the issues with them . . .If we were Sevco we would get away with the 1st 3 or 4 of these . . . but we are not. Still hope we get away with this though! When is the hearing ? Today sometime - we will have the outcome soon . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pod Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 35 minutes ago, turrabuddie said: When is the hearing ? Haven't heard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabuddies Posted February 28, 2019 Report Share Posted February 28, 2019 Two game ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.