Tommy Posted May 2, 2018 Report Share Posted May 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, div said: Only person left to pay is Gordon Good to hear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TsuMirren Posted May 2, 2018 Report Share Posted May 2, 2018 47 minutes ago, div said: The old consortium have already received all their money. Well, they've nearly all received their money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windae cleaner Posted May 2, 2018 Report Share Posted May 2, 2018 30 minutes ago, div said: Spot on. If West Ham stay up and they want him then £5m is absolutely nothing to them. Let's be having you Hammers! Only one flaw the Irons are on the way down Moysie is doomed wether they stay up or down At the moment he has the worse record of any West Ham manager Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintargyll Posted May 2, 2018 Report Share Posted May 2, 2018 39 minutes ago, div said: I'm not convinced Hibs will be tempted by £3m at this stage. They have most of the summer to play hardball on McGinn, either to get him to extend by another year, giving them the same problem next summer, or to sell. Bearing in mind if they sell for £3m they would be due us the best part of £1m I can't see them being massively tempted by £2m right now. A Premiership club should be good for £5m in my opinion! Im sure i saw an interview with Lennon where he said that McGinn would not go for any less than £5M thats why im hoping for £6M and a cool £2M to the buds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 18 hours ago, Drew said: Indeed. Quite why people still struggle to grasp this is a mystery. possibly, the fact that i hadn't read anything that indicated this fact after we were told that the old board received monies from a previous transferthis would debunk your mystery theory. a condescending wee post on your part, but devoid of swear words. Your getting better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 17 hours ago, TsuMirren said: Well, they've nearly all received their money. Thanks for this, it flies in the face of the smug comments of at least one other so expect a hoity-toity reply Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TsuMirren Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 30 minutes ago, beyond our ken said: Thanks for this, it flies in the face of the smug comments of at least one other so expect a hoity-toity reply It's as good as all complete, you're taking around July/August and negligible figures. Confidentiality of course procludes me from saying any more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 3 hours ago, beyond our ken said: Thanks for this, it flies in the face of the smug comments of at least one other so expect a hoity-toity reply Stewart Gilmour told me on 5th April that "the old board have been completely paid out". I kind of assumed he'd be a reasonable source of that information. My bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 3 hours ago, beyond our ken said: possibly, the fact that i hadn't read anything that indicated this fact after we were told that the old board received monies from a previous transferthis would debunk your mystery theory. a condescending wee post on your part, but devoid of swear words. Your getting better f**k off! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beyond our ken Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 Your an angry drunk wee fella, put the bottle down and get back to work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smcc Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 22 hours ago, TsuMirren said: Well, they've nearly all received their money. Which of them hasn't received his money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TsuMirren Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 19 minutes ago, smcc said: Which of them hasn't received his money? I believe that's also confidential, maybe even so much so that Stewart isn't aware and hence he believed he was being 100% accurate when talking to Div. As of February, post-accelerated payment talks, there was still a payment plan in place. At the same time a plan was agreed to finally begin facilitating the 50K facility for the club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
div Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 Either way, any income from John McGinn being sold won't be used to pay off the old consortium, I think we can all agree that is the case? And it won't be used to accelerate any pay out to Gordon either. It's highly possible that the cut on John will be the highest transfer fee the club has ever received, eclipsing the £850K we got for Ferguson. It will be a game changing windfall for us when it happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TsuMirren Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, div said: Either way, any income from John McGinn being sold won't be used to pay off the old consortium, I think we can all agree that is the case? And it won't be used to accelerate any pay out to Gordon either. It's highly possible that the cut on John will be the highest transfer fee the club has ever received, eclipsing the £850K we got for Ferguson. It will be a game changing windfall for us when it happens. Yup, yup, indeed, certainly will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St.Ricky Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, div said: Either way, any income from John McGinn being sold won't be used to pay off the old consortium, I think we can all agree that is the case? And it won't be used to accelerate any pay out to Gordon either. It's highly possible that the cut on John will be the highest transfer fee the club has ever received, eclipsing the £850K we got for Ferguson. It will be a game changing windfall for us when it happens. This would be a fantastic opportunity for the club. Great backdrop to use increased income from Ticket sales, sponsorship and "guaranteed" minimum prize money for the playing budget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, TsuMirren said: Yup, yup, indeed, certainly will. Would it be enough to renovate an astroturf pitch though? Let’s pretend I never said that. Bloody drama queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabuddies Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 Stop short changing the boy. Chelsea want £11M for a midfielder with 7 caps (same as J McG) who had played 11 mins for the first team and Bristol City are wanting £6M for a young full back. I'm hoping it's the EPL clubs who come for him and the bidding starts at £7M. The green bigots won't get involved at that price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 10 minutes ago, rabuddies said: Stop short changing the boy. Chelsea want £11M for a midfielder with 7 caps (same as J McG) who had played 11 mins for the first team and Bristol City are wanting £6M for a young full back. I'm hoping it's the EPL clubs who come for him and the bidding starts at £7M. The green bigots won't get involved at that price. I agree. I reckon John won't move on for less than £5M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintGlenburn Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 Either way, any income from John McGinn being sold won't be used to pay off the old consortium, I think we can all agree that is the case? And it won't be used to accelerate any pay out to Gordon either. It's highly possible that the cut on John will be the highest transfer fee the club has ever received, eclipsing the £850K we got for Ferguson. It will be a game changing windfall for us when it happens. This in a nutshell. Earlier the better too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargsBud Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 How long does his current contract at Hibs last? We've been thinking for a few transfer windows now that he'll move on and hasn't. Is it time to hit the panic button if he doesn't move this time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorizaar Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, LargsBud said: How long does his current contract at Hibs last? We've been thinking for a few transfer windows now that he'll move on and hasn't. Is it time to hit the panic button if he doesn't move this time? It's hardly anything worth panicking over. If we get a cut, great, if we don't, we carry on as normal. Little point in getting excited about money we might never get. Edited May 3, 2018 by Thorizaar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E=Mc2 Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 6 hours ago, div said: Stewart Gilmour told me on 5th April that "the old board have been completely paid out". I kind of assumed he'd be a reasonable source of that information. My bad. Stewart also told me ages ago 71 points would win the league. Cue a song...... He's Nostradamus in disguise.............................. Nostradamus! Nostradamus! He's Nostradamus in disguise. Nostradamus in disguise........................ (please not the sin bin) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedflanders123 Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 2 hours ago, LargsBud said: How long does his current contract at Hibs last? We've been thinking for a few transfer windows now that he'll move on and hasn't. Is it time to hit the panic button if he doesn't move this time? Hibs will not allow him to run his contract down and he leaves for nothing. If a suitable offer comes in they will accept it as this will be his final year. I know John has indicated he would like to stay but money talks and I suspect he will be sold this summer so they can buy Scott Allan and maybe retain their other good players by offering them a better deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LargsBud Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Thorizaar said: It's hardly anything worth panicking over. If we get a cut, great, if we don't, we carry on as normal. Little point in getting excited about money we might never get. It is important. We don't include these sell on clauses just for the fun of it or for a nice wee bonus. It will be factored in to the value of the player and the long term profitability of our youth academy. If we don't get anything he will be another name to add to the list of talent we've developed and got close to the square root of f**k all for. Edited May 3, 2018 by LargsBud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSS Posted May 3, 2018 Report Share Posted May 3, 2018 2 hours ago, nedflanders123 said: Hibs will not allow him to run his contract down and he leaves for nothing. If a suitable offer comes in they will accept it as this will be his final year. I know John has indicated he would like to stay but money talks and I suspect he will be sold this summer so they can buy Scott Allan and maybe retain their other good players by offering them a better deal. McGinn has got to come out with the "I want to stay" patter to stay onside with the hibs support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.