John McGinn

[portmahomack saint]

Frank Lampard in for John McGinn,  just had a call from Flarey Bob so the info is sound

Edited June 24, 2018 by portmahomack saint
s

[John Gotti]

1 hour ago, Hambud said:

The thing is its not like they have paid out a massive amount on him so they don't actually have a great amount to lose. He has gone there won a scottish cup, won promotion and would leave them an established top league team.

If he goes next year for free what have they actually lost? If they sell him, between our 33% and whatever amount they need to pay elsewhere, are they going to be left with much change? Probably not. Is it really in their best interests to sell him or just get another year out of him.
 

If Hibs can flog him for £2-3M they can't let that slip away.  I just don't think there is that much money in Scottish football.

[munoz]

£3M bid from Derby supposedly. 

[saintargyll]

Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M

[DougJamie]

2 minutes ago, saintargyll said:

Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M

Fitzy reportingly wants 15m

[pod]

2 minutes ago, saintargyll said:

Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M

Nothing less than £5m, but you can have him for nothing next season. 

[munoz]

11 hours ago, pod said:

Nothing less than £5m, but you can have him for nothing next season. 

Rumoured that Celtic are still favourite with a £2.7M bid plus Allan and Morgan on loan. Probably nonsense. 

[Magic Monkey]

1 hour ago, munoz said:

Rumoured that Celtic are still favourite with a £2.7M bid plus Allan and Morgan on loan. Probably nonsense. 

So our portion of that would be about £900k, and Lewis Morgan on loan... 

[shull]

Going to be a bidding war with a couple of Clubs interestit. 

Major windfall on it's way to Greenhill Road. 

[DougJamie]

50 minutes ago, shull said:

Going to be a bidding war with a couple of Clubs interestit. 

Major windfall on it's way to Greenhill Road. 

Might even be able to afford a new Goalie

 

In all seriousness we do actually need another one

[pod]

12 minutes ago, DougJamie said:

Might even be able to afford a new Goalie

 

In all seriousness we do actually need another one

Don't get him started.  Spend it on a goal scorer. 

[kevo_smfc]

14 hours ago, saintargyll said:

Hibs have already said they will not entertain anything less than £5M

I know they were definitely quoted saying this in January,  though surely his clubs valuation has dropped now he has 12 months left rather than 18. I do believe however a minimum £3m is what they will entertain. Whether that's plus a player exchange or not who knows,  could depends on a bidding war. 

[St.Ricky]

15 hours ago, DougJamie said:

Fitzy reportingly wants 15m

And Buffon as second choice goalkeeper. 

[shull]

3 minutes ago, St.Ricky said:

And Buffon as second choice goalkeeper. 

We already have Buffoon as our Goalie. 

[StanleySaint]

and one of our highest number posters

[shull]

[Isle Of Bute Saint]

Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. 

[munoz]

34 minutes ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said:

Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. 

Gilmour said 33% . Someone's telling porkies. 

[MenstrieSaint]

my understanding is , that its %30 of any transfer monies received  over £100,000 , and we won,t be entitled to any further sell on fees , should meatball be transferred again.

[17/03/13]

2 minutes ago, MenstrieSaint said:

my understanding is , that its %30 of any transfer monies received  over £100,000 , and we won,t be entitled to any further sell on fees , should meatball be transferred again.

This.....but its 33.3%

 

Say he gets sold for £3m, our share should be 33.3% of £2.9m (£966,657)

[Soctty]

I would think the clause is 33% of the fee received by Hibs - the way the vast majority of sell on clauses work. I have heard that Petrie claimed the clause was lower, but unless Gilmour has been economical with the truth, I'd assume he's just trying to appease his fans a little.

[djchapsticks]

IOBS, stop buying into the Hibs supporters on Pie and Bovril. 

It's a running joke from them that everytime a St Mirren fan mentions the sell on % they knock it down the way to get bites as they usually get so many. 

[LargsBud]

Apparently he's not goingto Celtic. Which is great for us because they would definitely have done a deal which included Scott Allan and less cash.

I've heard from a decent source its not them so hopefully it's a pure cash deal somewhere.

[elvis]

4 hours ago, Isle Of Bute Saint said:

Hibs chairman at their AGM has said McGinn sell on clause is not 33% . Anyone know what it is ? A Hibs fan said it's 21%. 

Well our chairmen at the time Mr Gilmour stood in a meeting and told everyone there myself included it was 33%. 

[div]

Definitely 33% of any profit Hibs make.

Believe they paid £120K for him,  so if they sell for £4m we'd get a third of £3.88m give or take so our cut would be just under £1.3m.